• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Use of a new pneumatic system to support capillary microperfusion in surgical wound healing: an animal model

J. Mejzlik, L. Skoloudik, M. Cerny, A. Ryska, V. Radochova, V. Pellantova, V. Chrobok,

. 2019 ; 28 (4) : 229-237. [pub] 2019Apr02

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19044887

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of the a developed medical device, based on the principle of mechanical support of capillary microperfusion. METHOD: In this pilot study involving experimental animals, each pig had two standardised surgical wounds. A cuff that delivered pneumatic three-second micropulses was applied to the wound designated as the 'experimental wound'. The pressure inside the cuff was kept at a level <10mmHg so that during the pulse, the pressure would decrease by one third of the established value. The second wound, designated as the 'control wound', was covered with a standard dressing. Over the course of five days, the pressure inside the cuff was monitored. After the five days, the experimental animal was euthanised and two specimens were collected for histological analysis (one sample from each wound site). Wound healing parameters for the experimental and control wounds were examined by a pathologist. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: In this study, 10 experimental animals were used. The average pressure in the cuffs was 8.46mmHg (standard deviation: 3.86). No disparities in wound healing were observed in cases of different average pressures in the experimental wound. With respect to wound healing parameters, a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found in favour of the experimental wound. The occurrence of histological signs of poor healing was identical in both study wounds. CONCLUSION: The study shows that a device for the support of capillary microperfusion of the surgical wound had a positive effect. It was confirmed that the mechanical support system of capillary microperfusion was safe and reliable.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044887
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200113081427.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.4.229 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30975053
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Mejzlik, Jan $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Use of a new pneumatic system to support capillary microperfusion in surgical wound healing: an animal model / $c J. Mejzlik, L. Skoloudik, M. Cerny, A. Ryska, V. Radochova, V. Pellantova, V. Chrobok,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of the a developed medical device, based on the principle of mechanical support of capillary microperfusion. METHOD: In this pilot study involving experimental animals, each pig had two standardised surgical wounds. A cuff that delivered pneumatic three-second micropulses was applied to the wound designated as the 'experimental wound'. The pressure inside the cuff was kept at a level <10mmHg so that during the pulse, the pressure would decrease by one third of the established value. The second wound, designated as the 'control wound', was covered with a standard dressing. Over the course of five days, the pressure inside the cuff was monitored. After the five days, the experimental animal was euthanised and two specimens were collected for histological analysis (one sample from each wound site). Wound healing parameters for the experimental and control wounds were examined by a pathologist. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: In this study, 10 experimental animals were used. The average pressure in the cuffs was 8.46mmHg (standard deviation: 3.86). No disparities in wound healing were observed in cases of different average pressures in the experimental wound. With respect to wound healing parameters, a statistically significant difference (p<0.05) was found in favour of the experimental wound. The occurrence of histological signs of poor healing was identical in both study wounds. CONCLUSION: The study shows that a device for the support of capillary microperfusion of the surgical wound had a positive effect. It was confirmed that the mechanical support system of capillary microperfusion was safe and reliable.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a terapie ran pomocí řízeného podtlaku $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D054843
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a chirurgická rána $x terapie $7 D000072836
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
650    _2
$a hojení ran $7 D014945
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Skoloudik, Lukas $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cerny, Michal $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ryska, Ales $u Fingerland's institute of Pathology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Radochova, Vera $u Vivarium, Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defence, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pellantova, Vera $u Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Chrobok, Viktor $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00169280 $t Journal of wound care $x 0969-0700 $g Roč. 28, č. 4 (2019), s. 229-237
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30975053 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200113081759 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483156 $s 1083560
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 28 $c 4 $d 229-237 $e 2019Apr02 $i 0969-0700 $m Journal of wound care $n J. wound care $x MED00169280
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...