• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update

B. Ljungberg, L. Albiges, Y. Abu-Ghanem, K. Bensalah, S. Dabestani, S. Fernández-Pello, RH. Giles, F. Hofmann, M. Hora, MA. Kuczyk, T. Kuusk, TB. Lam, L. Marconi, AS. Merseburger, T. Powles, M. Staehler, R. Tahbaz, A. Volpe, A. Bex,

. 2019 ; 75 (5) : 799-810. [pub] 20190223

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, směrnice pro lékařskou praxi

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19044968

CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated RCC guideline based on standardised methodology including systematic reviews, which is robust, transparent, reproducible, and reliable. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: For the 2019 update, evidence synthesis was undertaken based on a comprehensive and structured literature assessment for new and relevant data. Where necessary, formal systematic reviews adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were undertaken. Relevant databases (Medline, Cochrane Libraries, trial registries, conference proceedings) were searched until June 2018, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled studies with a comparator arm, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Where relevant, risk of bias (RoB) assessment, and qualitative and quantitative syntheses of the evidence were performed. The remaining sections of the document were updated following a structured literature assessment. Clinical practice recommendations were developed and issued based on the modified GRADE framework. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All chapters of the RCC guidelines were updated based on a structured literature assessment, for prioritised topics based on the availability of robust data. For RCTs, RoB was low across studies. For most non-RCTs, clinical and methodological heterogeneity prevented pooling of data. The majority of included studies were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts, based on single- or multi-institutional data or national registries. The exception was for the treatment of metastatic RCC, for which there were several large RCTs, resulting in recommendations based on higher levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 RCC guidelines have been updated by the multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards. These guidelines provide the most reliable contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC in 2019. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma Guideline Panel has thoroughly evaluated the available research data on kidney cancer to establish international standards for the care of kidney cancer patients.

Academic Urology Unit University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

Department of Cancer Medicine Gustave Roussy Université Paris Saclay Villejuif France

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden

Department of Nephrology and Hypertension Patient Advocate International Kidney Cancer Coalition University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences Urology and Andrology Umeå University Umeå Sweden

Department of Urology Aberdeen Royal Infirmary Aberdeen UK

Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany

Department of Urology Cabueñes University Hospital Gijón Spain

Department of Urology Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer Ramat Gan Israel

Department of Urology Coimbra University Hospital Coimbra Portugal

Department of Urology Faculty Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Urology Ludwig Maximilians University Munich Germany

Department of Urology Royal Free Hospital Pond Street London UK

Department of Urology Sunderby Hospital Sunderby Sweden

Department of Urology The Netherlands Cancer Institute Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital Amsterdam The Netherlands

Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology University Hospital Schleswig Holstein Lübeck Germany

Department of Urology University of Rennes Rennes France

Division of Urology Maggiore della Carità Hospital University of Eastern Piedmont Novara Italy

The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust London UK

The Royal Free NHS Trust and Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London London UK

UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science London UK

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044968
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200114083311.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30803729
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Ljungberg, Börje $u Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. Electronic address: borje.ljungberg@umu.se.
245    10
$a European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update / $c B. Ljungberg, L. Albiges, Y. Abu-Ghanem, K. Bensalah, S. Dabestani, S. Fernández-Pello, RH. Giles, F. Hofmann, M. Hora, MA. Kuczyk, T. Kuusk, TB. Lam, L. Marconi, AS. Merseburger, T. Powles, M. Staehler, R. Tahbaz, A. Volpe, A. Bex,
520    9_
$a CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated RCC guideline based on standardised methodology including systematic reviews, which is robust, transparent, reproducible, and reliable. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: For the 2019 update, evidence synthesis was undertaken based on a comprehensive and structured literature assessment for new and relevant data. Where necessary, formal systematic reviews adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were undertaken. Relevant databases (Medline, Cochrane Libraries, trial registries, conference proceedings) were searched until June 2018, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled studies with a comparator arm, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Where relevant, risk of bias (RoB) assessment, and qualitative and quantitative syntheses of the evidence were performed. The remaining sections of the document were updated following a structured literature assessment. Clinical practice recommendations were developed and issued based on the modified GRADE framework. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: All chapters of the RCC guidelines were updated based on a structured literature assessment, for prioritised topics based on the availability of robust data. For RCTs, RoB was low across studies. For most non-RCTs, clinical and methodological heterogeneity prevented pooling of data. The majority of included studies were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts, based on single- or multi-institutional data or national registries. The exception was for the treatment of metastatic RCC, for which there were several large RCTs, resulting in recommendations based on higher levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The 2019 RCC guidelines have been updated by the multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards. These guidelines provide the most reliable contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC in 2019. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma Guideline Panel has thoroughly evaluated the available research data on kidney cancer to establish international standards for the care of kidney cancer patients.
650    _2
$a protinádorové látky imunologicky aktivní $x terapeutické užití $7 D000074322
650    _2
$a karcinom z renálních buněk $x diagnóza $x sekundární $x terapie $7 D002292
650    _2
$a adjuvantní chemoterapie $7 D017024
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nádory ledvin $x diagnóza $x patologie $x terapie $7 D007680
650    _2
$a cílená molekulární terapie $7 D058990
650    _2
$a nefrektomie $x metody $7 D009392
650    _2
$a pozorné vyčkávání $7 D057832
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi $7 D017065
700    1_
$a Albiges, Laurance $u Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
700    1_
$a Abu-Ghanem, Yasmin $u Department of Urology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
700    1_
$a Bensalah, Karim $u Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France.
700    1_
$a Dabestani, Saeed $u Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Fernández-Pello, Sergio $u Department of Urology, Cabueñes University Hospital, Gijón, Spain.
700    1_
$a Giles, Rachel H $u Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Patient Advocate International Kidney Cancer Coalition (IKCC), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Hofmann, Fabian $u Department of Urology, Sunderby Hospital, Sunderby, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Hora, Milan $u Department of Urology, Faculty Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kuczyk, Markus A $u Department of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
700    1_
$a Kuusk, Teele $u Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Lam, Thomas B $u Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.
700    1_
$a Marconi, Lorenzo $u Department of Urology, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.
700    1_
$a Merseburger, Axel S $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
700    1_
$a Powles, Thomas $u The Royal Free NHS Trust and Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Staehler, Michael $u Department of Urology, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Tahbaz, Rana $u Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Volpe, Alessandro $u Division of Urology, Maggiore della Carità Hospital, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
700    1_
$a Bex, Axel $u The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, London, UK; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
773    0_
$w MED00001669 $t European urology $x 1873-7560 $g Roč. 75, č. 5 (2019), s. 799-810
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30803729 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200114083644 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483237 $s 1083641
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 75 $c 5 $d 799-810 $e 20190223 $i 1873-7560 $m European urology $n Eur Urol $x MED00001669
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...