Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Soil microarthropods alter the outcome of plant-soil feedback experiments

E. Kuťáková, S. Cesarz, Z. Münzbergová, N. Eisenhauer,

. 2018 ; 8 (1) : 11898. [pub] 20180809

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19045314

Plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects are studied as plant growth responses to soil previously conditioned by another plant. These studies usually exclude effects of soil fauna, such as nematodes, soil arthropods, and earthworms, although these organisms are known to influence plant performance. Here, we aimed to explore effects of a model microarthropod community on PSFs. We performed a PSF experiment in microcosms with two plant species, Phleum pratense and Poa pratensis. We added a model microarthropod community consisting of three fungivorous springtail species (Proisotoma minuta, Folsomia candida, and Sinella curviseta) and a predatory mite (Hypoaspis aculeifer) to half of the microcosms. We measured seedling establishment and plant biomass, nematode and microbial community composition, microbial biomass, and mycorrhizal colonization of roots. Microarthropods caused changes in the composition of nematode and microbial communities. Their effect was particularly strong in Phleum plants where they altered the composition of bacterial communities. Microarthropods also generally influenced plant performance, and their effects depended on previous soil conditioning and the identity of plant species. Microarthropods did not affect soil microbial biomass and mycorrhizal colonization of roots. We conclude that the role of soil microarthropods should be considered in future PSF experiments, especially as their effects are plant species-specific.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19045314
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200113082034.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2018 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41598-018-30340-w $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30093622
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kuťáková, Eliška $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01, Praha 2, Czech Republic. kutakova.eliska@gmail.com. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. kutakova.eliska@gmail.com.
245    10
$a Soil microarthropods alter the outcome of plant-soil feedback experiments / $c E. Kuťáková, S. Cesarz, Z. Münzbergová, N. Eisenhauer,
520    9_
$a Plant-soil feedback (PSF) effects are studied as plant growth responses to soil previously conditioned by another plant. These studies usually exclude effects of soil fauna, such as nematodes, soil arthropods, and earthworms, although these organisms are known to influence plant performance. Here, we aimed to explore effects of a model microarthropod community on PSFs. We performed a PSF experiment in microcosms with two plant species, Phleum pratense and Poa pratensis. We added a model microarthropod community consisting of three fungivorous springtail species (Proisotoma minuta, Folsomia candida, and Sinella curviseta) and a predatory mite (Hypoaspis aculeifer) to half of the microcosms. We measured seedling establishment and plant biomass, nematode and microbial community composition, microbial biomass, and mycorrhizal colonization of roots. Microarthropods caused changes in the composition of nematode and microbial communities. Their effect was particularly strong in Phleum plants where they altered the composition of bacterial communities. Microarthropods also generally influenced plant performance, and their effects depended on previous soil conditioning and the identity of plant species. Microarthropods did not affect soil microbial biomass and mycorrhizal colonization of roots. We conclude that the role of soil microarthropods should be considered in future PSF experiments, especially as their effects are plant species-specific.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a členovci $x klasifikace $x fyziologie $7 D001181
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a feedback psychologický $x fyziologie $7 D030141
650    _2
$a roztoči $x fyziologie $7 D008925
650    _2
$a mykorhiza $x fyziologie $7 D038821
650    _2
$a hlístice $x fyziologie $7 D009348
650    _2
$a Oligochaeta $x fyziologie $7 D009835
650    _2
$a Phleum $x mikrobiologie $x parazitologie $x fyziologie $7 D031784
650    _2
$a kořeny rostlin $x mikrobiologie $x parazitologie $x fyziologie $7 D018517
650    _2
$a Poa $x mikrobiologie $x parazitologie $x fyziologie $7 D031785
650    _2
$a půda $x parazitologie $7 D012987
650    12
$a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Cesarz, Simone $u German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Institute of Ecology, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743, Jena, Germany.
700    1_
$a Münzbergová, Zuzana $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01, Praha 2, Czech Republic. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, v. v. i., Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Eisenhauer, Nico $u German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Deutscher Platz 5e, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Institute of Ecology, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743, Jena, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 8, č. 1 (2018), s. 11898
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30093622 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200113082406 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483583 $s 1083987
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 8 $c 1 $d 11898 $e 20180809 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...