Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study

P. Schütz, WR. Taylor, B. Postolka, SF. Fucentese, PP. Koch, MAR. Freeman, V. Pinskerova, R. List,

. 2019 ; 37 (11) : 2337-2347. [pub] 20190807

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20006155

Grantová podpora
Medacta International - International
Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) Switzerland - International

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2012-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Free Content od 2001 do Před 1 rokem

Joint stability is a primary concern in total knee joint replacement. The GMK Sphere prosthesis was specifically designed to provide medial compartment anterior-posterior (A-P) stability, while permitting rotational freedom of the joint through a flat lateral tibial surface. The objective of this study was to establish the changes in joint kinematics introduced by the GMK Sphere prosthesis during gait activities in comparison to conventional posterior-stabilized (PS) fixed-bearing and ultra-congruent (UC) mobile-bearing geometries. The A-P translation and internal/external rotation of three cohorts, each with 10 good outcome subjects (2.9 ± 1.6 years postop), with a GMK Sphere, GMK PS or GMK UC implant were analysed throughout complete cycles of gait activities using dynamic videofluoroscopy. The GMK Sphere showed the smallest range of medial compartment A-P translation for level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent (3.6 ± 0.9 mm, 3.1 ± 0.8 mm, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm), followed by the GMK UC (5.7 ± 1.0 mm, 8.0 ± 1.7 mm, 8.7 ± 1.9 mm) and the GMK PS (10.3 ± 2.2 mm, 10.1 ± 2.6 mm, 11.6 ± 1.6 mm) geometries. The GMK Sphere exhibited the largest range of lateral compartment A-P translation (12.1 ± 2.2 mm), and the largest range of tibial internal/external rotation (13.2 ± 2.2°), both during stair descent. This study has shown that the GMK Sphere clearly restricts A-P motion of the medial condyle during gait activities while still allowing a large range of axial rotation. The additional comparison against the conventional GMK PS and UC geometries, not only demonstrates that implant geometry is a key factor in governing tibio-femoral kinematics, but also that the geometry itself probably plays a more dominant role for joint movement than the type of gait activity. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 37:2337-2347, 2019.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20006155
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200526083826.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jor.24416 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31304995
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Schütz, Pascal $u Institute for Biomechanics, D-HEST, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
245    10
$a Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study / $c P. Schütz, WR. Taylor, B. Postolka, SF. Fucentese, PP. Koch, MAR. Freeman, V. Pinskerova, R. List,
520    9_
$a Joint stability is a primary concern in total knee joint replacement. The GMK Sphere prosthesis was specifically designed to provide medial compartment anterior-posterior (A-P) stability, while permitting rotational freedom of the joint through a flat lateral tibial surface. The objective of this study was to establish the changes in joint kinematics introduced by the GMK Sphere prosthesis during gait activities in comparison to conventional posterior-stabilized (PS) fixed-bearing and ultra-congruent (UC) mobile-bearing geometries. The A-P translation and internal/external rotation of three cohorts, each with 10 good outcome subjects (2.9 ± 1.6 years postop), with a GMK Sphere, GMK PS or GMK UC implant were analysed throughout complete cycles of gait activities using dynamic videofluoroscopy. The GMK Sphere showed the smallest range of medial compartment A-P translation for level walking, downhill walking, and stair descent (3.6 ± 0.9 mm, 3.1 ± 0.8 mm, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm), followed by the GMK UC (5.7 ± 1.0 mm, 8.0 ± 1.7 mm, 8.7 ± 1.9 mm) and the GMK PS (10.3 ± 2.2 mm, 10.1 ± 2.6 mm, 11.6 ± 1.6 mm) geometries. The GMK Sphere exhibited the largest range of lateral compartment A-P translation (12.1 ± 2.2 mm), and the largest range of tibial internal/external rotation (13.2 ± 2.2°), both during stair descent. This study has shown that the GMK Sphere clearly restricts A-P motion of the medial condyle during gait activities while still allowing a large range of axial rotation. The additional comparison against the conventional GMK PS and UC geometries, not only demonstrates that implant geometry is a key factor in governing tibio-femoral kinematics, but also that the geometry itself probably plays a more dominant role for joint movement than the type of gait activity. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 37:2337-2347, 2019.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fluoroskopie $7 D005471
650    12
$a chůze (způsob) $7 D005684
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a protézy kolene $7 D007720
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Taylor, William R $u Institute for Biomechanics, D-HEST, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Postolka, Barbara $u Institute for Biomechanics, D-HEST, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Fucentese, Sandro F $u Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Koch, Peter P $u Klinik für Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Winterthur Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Freeman, Michael A R $u The Royal London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Pinskerova, Vera $u First Orthopaedic Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a List, Renate $u Institute for Biomechanics, D-HEST, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
773    0_
$w MED00005045 $t Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society $x 1554-527X $g Roč. 37, č. 11 (2019), s. 2337-2347
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31304995 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200526083823 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1525013 $s 1096211
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 37 $c 11 $d 2337-2347 $e 20190807 $i 1554-527X $m Journal of orthopaedic research $n J Orthop Res $x MED00005045
GRA    __
$p Medacta International $2 International
GRA    __
$p Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI) Switzerland $2 International
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...