-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Size factor as one of the problems in the sex estimation of skulls: upper palaeolithic sample from Predmostí (Czech Republic) as an example
A. Sefcáková, S. Katina, J. Velemínski, J. Brůzek, P. Velemínský, M. Thurzo,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
21452686
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- databáze faktografické MeSH
- diskriminační analýza MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kefalometrie metody MeSH
- lebka anatomie a histologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- určení pohlaví podle kostry metody MeSH
- velikost orgánu MeSH
- zkameněliny * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
In this study we estimate sex and population affinity of Gravettian Predmostí (P) skulls using linear and geometric discriminant analysis (DA), and compare them with results of 2D geometric morphometrics (GM). We used the measurements of P3 and P9 males, P4 and P10 females, as originally estimated by Matiegka (1934), as well as two databases--the recent skull database of Howells and the fossil data of Henke. DA classifies the P skulls as robust and belonging to the "male" region, loosing the sensitivity of inter-population differences influenced by size factor. That is why this approach could not be applied. The geographic inter-population differences according to DA do not define P skull shapes as extreme. The influence of geographic variability could be stronger than the inter-sexual differences. Despite the chronological differences between databases and Gravettian skulls, these differences are a component of regional inter-population variability. According to our results, GM is more successful methodological approach than DA. Our previous sex estimation of P skulls with help of GM is completely in accordance with the classical morphoscopic estimation. However, an appropriate reference database is necessary in both the GM and DA approaches. For the sexing of skull with unknown population affinity, and with absence of appropriate reference database, we suggest to use the application of more subjective visual scoring methods.
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20014327
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200921153057.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200918s2010 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21452686
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Sefcáková, Alena $u Department of Anthropology, Slovak National Museum, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. alena.sefcakova@snm.sk
- 245 10
- $a Size factor as one of the problems in the sex estimation of skulls: upper palaeolithic sample from Predmostí (Czech Republic) as an example / $c A. Sefcáková, S. Katina, J. Velemínski, J. Brůzek, P. Velemínský, M. Thurzo,
- 520 9_
- $a In this study we estimate sex and population affinity of Gravettian Predmostí (P) skulls using linear and geometric discriminant analysis (DA), and compare them with results of 2D geometric morphometrics (GM). We used the measurements of P3 and P9 males, P4 and P10 females, as originally estimated by Matiegka (1934), as well as two databases--the recent skull database of Howells and the fossil data of Henke. DA classifies the P skulls as robust and belonging to the "male" region, loosing the sensitivity of inter-population differences influenced by size factor. That is why this approach could not be applied. The geographic inter-population differences according to DA do not define P skull shapes as extreme. The influence of geographic variability could be stronger than the inter-sexual differences. Despite the chronological differences between databases and Gravettian skulls, these differences are a component of regional inter-population variability. According to our results, GM is more successful methodological approach than DA. Our previous sex estimation of P skulls with help of GM is completely in accordance with the classical morphoscopic estimation. However, an appropriate reference database is necessary in both the GM and DA approaches. For the sexing of skull with unknown population affinity, and with absence of appropriate reference database, we suggest to use the application of more subjective visual scoring methods.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a kefalometrie $x metody $7 D002508
- 650 _2
- $a databáze faktografické $7 D016208
- 650 _2
- $a diskriminační analýza $7 D016002
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a zkameněliny $7 D005580
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a velikost orgánu $7 D009929
- 650 _2
- $a určení pohlaví podle kostry $x metody $7 D054881
- 650 _2
- $a lebka $x anatomie a histologie $7 D012886
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Katina, Stanislav
- 700 1_
- $a Velemínski, Jana
- 700 1_
- $a Brůzek, Jaroslav
- 700 1_
- $a Velemínský, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Thurzo, Milan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000473 $t Anthropologischer Anzeiger; Bericht uber die biologisch-anthropologische Literatur $x 0003-5548 $g Roč. 68, č. 2 (2010), s. 221-237
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21452686 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200918 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200921153057 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1565179 $s 1104485
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 68 $c 2 $d 221-237 $e - $i 0003-5548 $m Anthropologischer anzeiger $n Anthropol. Anz. $x MED00000473
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200918