• Something wrong with this record ?

Computer-facilitated substance use screening and brief advice for teens in primary care: an international trial

SK. Harris, L. Csémy, L. Sherritt, O. Starostova, S. Van Hook, J. Johnson, S. Boulter, T. Brooks, P. Carey, R. Kossack, JW. Kulig, N. Van Vranken, JR. Knight,

. 2012 ; 129 (6) : 1072-1082. [pub] 20120507

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
T20MC07462 PHS HHS - United States
R01 DA018848 NIDA NIH HHS - United States
T71NC0009 PHS HHS - United States
R01DA018848 NIDA NIH HHS - United States
K07 AA013280 NIAAA NIH HHS - United States
R01DA018848-03S1 NIDA NIH HHS - United States

OBJECTIVE: Primary care providers need effective strategies for substance use screening and brief counseling of adolescents. We examined the effects of a new computer-facilitated screening and provider brief advice (cSBA) system. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental, asynchronous study design in which each site served as its own control. From 2005 to 2008, 12- to 18-year-olds arriving for routine care at 9 medical offices in New England (n = 2096, 58% females) and 10 in Prague, Czech Republic (n = 589, 47% females) were recruited. Patients completed measurements only during the initial treatment-as-usual study phase. We then conducted 1-hour provider training, and initiated the cSBA phase. Before seeing the provider, all cSBA participants completed a computerized screen, and then viewed screening results, scientific information, and true-life stories illustrating substance use harms. Providers received screening results and "talking points" designed to prompt 2 to 3 minutes of brief advice. We examined alcohol and cannabis use, initiation, and cessation rates over the past 90 days at 3-month follow-up, and over the past 12 months at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with treatment as usual, cSBA patients reported less alcohol use at follow-up in New England (3-month rates 15.5% vs 22.9%, adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.77; 12-month rates 29.3% vs 37.5%, aRRR = 0.73, 0.57-0.92), and less cannabis use in Prague (3-month rates 5.5% vs 9.8%, aRRR = 0.37, 0.17-0.77; 12-month rates 17.0% vs 28.7%, aRRR = 0.47, 0.32-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Computer-facilitated screening and provider brief advice appears promising for reducing substance use among adolescent primary care patients.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20014936
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200929120751.0
007      
ta
008      
200922s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1542/peds.2011-1624 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22566420
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Harris, Sion Kim $u Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. sion.harris@childrens.harvard.edu
245    10
$a Computer-facilitated substance use screening and brief advice for teens in primary care: an international trial / $c SK. Harris, L. Csémy, L. Sherritt, O. Starostova, S. Van Hook, J. Johnson, S. Boulter, T. Brooks, P. Carey, R. Kossack, JW. Kulig, N. Van Vranken, JR. Knight,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Primary care providers need effective strategies for substance use screening and brief counseling of adolescents. We examined the effects of a new computer-facilitated screening and provider brief advice (cSBA) system. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental, asynchronous study design in which each site served as its own control. From 2005 to 2008, 12- to 18-year-olds arriving for routine care at 9 medical offices in New England (n = 2096, 58% females) and 10 in Prague, Czech Republic (n = 589, 47% females) were recruited. Patients completed measurements only during the initial treatment-as-usual study phase. We then conducted 1-hour provider training, and initiated the cSBA phase. Before seeing the provider, all cSBA participants completed a computerized screen, and then viewed screening results, scientific information, and true-life stories illustrating substance use harms. Providers received screening results and "talking points" designed to prompt 2 to 3 minutes of brief advice. We examined alcohol and cannabis use, initiation, and cessation rates over the past 90 days at 3-month follow-up, and over the past 12 months at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Compared with treatment as usual, cSBA patients reported less alcohol use at follow-up in New England (3-month rates 15.5% vs 22.9%, adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.77; 12-month rates 29.3% vs 37.5%, aRRR = 0.73, 0.57-0.92), and less cannabis use in Prague (3-month rates 5.5% vs 9.8%, aRRR = 0.37, 0.17-0.77; 12-month rates 17.0% vs 28.7%, aRRR = 0.47, 0.32-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Computer-facilitated screening and provider brief advice appears promising for reducing substance use among adolescent primary care patients.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a diagnóza počítačová $x metody $x normy $7 D003936
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a internacionalita $7 D038622
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a primární zdravotní péče $x metody $x normy $7 D011320
650    _2
$a zpráva o sobě $x normy $7 D057566
650    _2
$a odhalování abúzu drog $x metody $x normy $7 D015813
650    _2
$a poruchy spojené s užíváním psychoaktivních látek $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D019966
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Nová Anglie $x epidemiologie $7 D009511
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Csémy, Ladislav
700    1_
$a Sherritt, Lon
700    1_
$a Starostova, Olga
700    1_
$a Van Hook, Shari
700    1_
$a Johnson, Julie
700    1_
$a Boulter, Suzanne
700    1_
$a Brooks, Traci
700    1_
$a Carey, Peggy
700    1_
$a Kossack, Robert
700    1_
$a Kulig, John W
700    1_
$a Van Vranken, Nancy
700    1_
$a Knight, John R
773    0_
$w MED00003743 $t Pediatrics $x 1098-4275 $g Roč. 129, č. 6 (2012), s. 1072-1082
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22566420 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200922 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200929120747 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1567793 $s 1105096
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 129 $c 6 $d 1072-1082 $e 20120507 $i 1098-4275 $m Pediatrics $n Pediatrics $x MED00003743
GRA    __
$a T20MC07462 $p PHS HHS $2 United States
GRA    __
$a R01 DA018848 $p NIDA NIH HHS $2 United States
GRA    __
$a T71NC0009 $p PHS HHS $2 United States
GRA    __
$a R01DA018848 $p NIDA NIH HHS $2 United States
GRA    __
$a K07 AA013280 $p NIAAA NIH HHS $2 United States
GRA    __
$a R01DA018848-03S1 $p NIDA NIH HHS $2 United States
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200922

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...