• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Which morphological characteristics are most influenced by the host matrix in downy mildews? A case study in Pseudoperonospora cubensis

F. Runge, B. Ndambi, M. Thines,

. 2012 ; 7 (11) : e44863. [pub] 20121115

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20014953

Before the advent of molecular phylogenetics, species concepts in the downy mildews, an economically important group of obligate biotrophic oomycete pathogens, have mostly been based upon host range and morphology. While molecular phylogenetic studies have confirmed a narrow host range for many downy mildew species, others, like Pseudoperonospora cubensis affect even different genera. Although often morphological differences were found for new, phylogenetically distinct species, uncertainty prevails regarding their host ranges, especially regarding related plants that have been reported as downy mildew hosts, but were not included in the phylogenetic studies. In these cases, the basis for deciding if the divergence in some morphological characters can be deemed sufficient for designation as separate species is uncertain, as observed morphological divergence could be due to different host matrices colonised. The broad host range of P. cubensis (ca. 60 host species) renders this pathogen an ideal model organism for the investigation of morphological variations in relation to the host matrix and to evaluate which characteristics are best indicators for conspecificity or distinctiveness. On the basis of twelve morphological characterisitcs and a set of twelve cucurbits from five different Cucurbitaceae tribes, including the two species, Cyclanthera pedata and Thladiantha dubia, hitherto not reported as hosts of P. cubensis, a significant influence of the host matrix on pathogen morphology was found. Given the high intraspecific variation of some characteristics, also their plasticity has to be taken into account. The implications for morphological species determination and the confidence limits of morphological characteristics are discussed. For species delimitations in Pseudoperonospora it is shown that the ratio of the height of the first ramification to the sporangiophore length, ratio of the longer to the shorter ultimate branchlet, and especially the length and width of sporangia, as well as, with some reservations, their ratio, are the most suitable characteristics for species delimitation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20014953
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200929120742.0
007      
ta
008      
200922s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0044863 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23166582
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Runge, Fabian $u University of Hohenheim, Institute of Botany, Stuttgart, Germany.
245    10
$a Which morphological characteristics are most influenced by the host matrix in downy mildews? A case study in Pseudoperonospora cubensis / $c F. Runge, B. Ndambi, M. Thines,
520    9_
$a Before the advent of molecular phylogenetics, species concepts in the downy mildews, an economically important group of obligate biotrophic oomycete pathogens, have mostly been based upon host range and morphology. While molecular phylogenetic studies have confirmed a narrow host range for many downy mildew species, others, like Pseudoperonospora cubensis affect even different genera. Although often morphological differences were found for new, phylogenetically distinct species, uncertainty prevails regarding their host ranges, especially regarding related plants that have been reported as downy mildew hosts, but were not included in the phylogenetic studies. In these cases, the basis for deciding if the divergence in some morphological characters can be deemed sufficient for designation as separate species is uncertain, as observed morphological divergence could be due to different host matrices colonised. The broad host range of P. cubensis (ca. 60 host species) renders this pathogen an ideal model organism for the investigation of morphological variations in relation to the host matrix and to evaluate which characteristics are best indicators for conspecificity or distinctiveness. On the basis of twelve morphological characterisitcs and a set of twelve cucurbits from five different Cucurbitaceae tribes, including the two species, Cyclanthera pedata and Thladiantha dubia, hitherto not reported as hosts of P. cubensis, a significant influence of the host matrix on pathogen morphology was found. Given the high intraspecific variation of some characteristics, also their plasticity has to be taken into account. The implications for morphological species determination and the confidence limits of morphological characteristics are discussed. For species delimitations in Pseudoperonospora it is shown that the ratio of the height of the first ramification to the sporangiophore length, ratio of the longer to the shorter ultimate branchlet, and especially the length and width of sporangia, as well as, with some reservations, their ratio, are the most suitable characteristics for species delimitation.
650    _2
$a Cucurbitaceae $x mikrobiologie $7 D019662
650    12
$a interakce hostitele a patogenu $7 D054884
650    _2
$a oomycety $x cytologie $x genetika $7 D009868
650    12
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
650    _2
$a sporangia $x anatomie a histologie $7 D058432
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Ndambi, Beninweck
700    1_
$a Thines, Marco
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 7, č. 11 (2012), s. e44863
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23166582 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200922 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200929120738 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1567809 $s 1105113
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 7 $c 11 $d e44863 $e 20121115 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200922

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...