-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The Effects of the Movement Tempo on the One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press Results
M. Wilk, A. Golas, P. Zmijewski, M. Krzysztofik, A. Filip, JD. Coso, JJ. Tufano,
Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1999
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
Open Access Digital Library
od 2008-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-13
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
PubMed
32269656
DOI
10.2478/hukin-2020-0001
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Different tempos of movement can be used during resistance training, but programming them is often a trial-and-error practice, as changing the speed at which the exercise is performed does not always correspond with the tempo at which the 1-repetition-maximum occurred. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of different movement tempos during the bench press (BP) exercise on the one-repetition maximum (1RM) load. Ninety men (age = 25.8 ± 5.3 years, body mass = 80.2 ± 14.9 kg), with a minimum one year of resistance training experience took part in the study. Using a randomized crossover design, each participant completed the BP 1RM test with five different movement tempos: V/0/V/0, 2/0/V/0, 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0. Repeated measures ANOVA compared the differences between the 1RM at each tempo. The 1RM load was significantly greater during V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 compared to 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0, and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the 1RM load was significantly greater during 5/0/V/0 compared to 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01), but there were no differences between either V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 (p = 0.92) or between 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p = 0.08). Therefore, different movement tempos used during training should be accompanied by their own tempo-specific 1RM testing, as slower eccentric phases significantly decrease maximal concentric performance. Furthermore, 1RM test procedures should include information about the movement tempo used during the test protocol. In addition, the standardization of the tempo should be taken into account in investigations that use the 1 RM test to assess the effects of any treatment on maximal muscle strength.
Centre for Sport Studies Rey Juan Carlos University Fuenlabrada Spain
Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Sport Sciences Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice Katowice Poland
Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20019406
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201123123346.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201103s2020 pl f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2478/hukin-2020-0001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32269656
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a pl
- 100 1_
- $a Wilk, Michal $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice Poland.
- 245 14
- $a The Effects of the Movement Tempo on the One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press Results / $c M. Wilk, A. Golas, P. Zmijewski, M. Krzysztofik, A. Filip, JD. Coso, JJ. Tufano,
- 520 9_
- $a Different tempos of movement can be used during resistance training, but programming them is often a trial-and-error practice, as changing the speed at which the exercise is performed does not always correspond with the tempo at which the 1-repetition-maximum occurred. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of different movement tempos during the bench press (BP) exercise on the one-repetition maximum (1RM) load. Ninety men (age = 25.8 ± 5.3 years, body mass = 80.2 ± 14.9 kg), with a minimum one year of resistance training experience took part in the study. Using a randomized crossover design, each participant completed the BP 1RM test with five different movement tempos: V/0/V/0, 2/0/V/0, 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0. Repeated measures ANOVA compared the differences between the 1RM at each tempo. The 1RM load was significantly greater during V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 compared to 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0, and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the 1RM load was significantly greater during 5/0/V/0 compared to 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01), but there were no differences between either V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 (p = 0.92) or between 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p = 0.08). Therefore, different movement tempos used during training should be accompanied by their own tempo-specific 1RM testing, as slower eccentric phases significantly decrease maximal concentric performance. Furthermore, 1RM test procedures should include information about the movement tempo used during the test protocol. In addition, the standardization of the tempo should be taken into account in investigations that use the 1 RM test to assess the effects of any treatment on maximal muscle strength.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Golas, Artur $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Zmijewski, Piotr $u Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Krzysztofik, Michal $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Filip, Aleksandra $u Institute of Sport Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Coso, Juan Del $u Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Tufano, James J $u Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181492 $t Journal of human kinetics $x 1640-5544 $g Roč. 72, č. - (2020), s. 151-159
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32269656 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201123123345 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1586183 $s 1109604
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 72 $c - $d 151-159 $e 20200331 $i 1640-5544 $m Journal of human kinetics $n J Hum Kinet $x MED00181492
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201103