-
Something wrong with this record ?
Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing
A. Mala, P. Osmancik, D. Herman, K. Curila, P. Stros, J. Vesela, R. Prochazkova, R. Petr,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1996 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1996-01-01
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Periprocedural ECG could determine the correct lead location. The aim of the current analysis is to characterize ECG criteria associated with a correct position of the right ventricular (RV) lead in the mid-septum. Patients with indications for a pacemaker had the RV lead implanted in the apex (Group A) or mid-septum using the standard fluoroscopic criteria. The exact position of the RV lead was verified using computed tomography. Based on the findings, the mid-septal group was divided into two subgroups: (i) true septum, i.e. lead was found in the mid-septum, and (ii) false septum, i.e. lead was in the adjacent areas (anterior wall, anteroseptal groove). Paced ECGs were acquired from all patients and multiple criteria were analysed. Paced ECGs from 106 patients were analysed (27 in A, 36 in true septum, and 43 in false septum group). Group A had a significantly wider QRS, more left-deviated axis and later transition zone compared with the true septum and false septum groups. There were no differences in presence of q in lead I, or notching in inferior or lateral leads between the three groups. QRS patterns of true septum and false septum groups were similar with only one exception of the transition zone. In the multivariate model, the only ECG parameters associated with correct lead placement in the septum was an earlier transition zone (odds ratio (OR) 2.53, P = 0.001). ECGs can be easily used to differentiate apical pacing from septal or septum-close pacing. The only ECG characteristic that could help to identify true septum lead position was the transition zone in the precordial leads. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02412176.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20022042
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201204093656.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa094 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32694949
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Mala, Anna $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing / $c A. Mala, P. Osmancik, D. Herman, K. Curila, P. Stros, J. Vesela, R. Prochazkova, R. Petr,
- 520 9_
- $a The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Periprocedural ECG could determine the correct lead location. The aim of the current analysis is to characterize ECG criteria associated with a correct position of the right ventricular (RV) lead in the mid-septum. Patients with indications for a pacemaker had the RV lead implanted in the apex (Group A) or mid-septum using the standard fluoroscopic criteria. The exact position of the RV lead was verified using computed tomography. Based on the findings, the mid-septal group was divided into two subgroups: (i) true septum, i.e. lead was found in the mid-septum, and (ii) false septum, i.e. lead was in the adjacent areas (anterior wall, anteroseptal groove). Paced ECGs were acquired from all patients and multiple criteria were analysed. Paced ECGs from 106 patients were analysed (27 in A, 36 in true septum, and 43 in false septum group). Group A had a significantly wider QRS, more left-deviated axis and later transition zone compared with the true septum and false septum groups. There were no differences in presence of q in lead I, or notching in inferior or lateral leads between the three groups. QRS patterns of true septum and false septum groups were similar with only one exception of the transition zone. In the multivariate model, the only ECG parameters associated with correct lead placement in the septum was an earlier transition zone (odds ratio (OR) 2.53, P = 0.001). ECGs can be easily used to differentiate apical pacing from septal or septum-close pacing. The only ECG characteristic that could help to identify true septum lead position was the transition zone in the precordial leads. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02412176.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Herman, Dalibor $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Curila, Karol $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Stros, Petr $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vesela, Jana $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Prochazkova, Radka $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Petr, Robert $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005247 $t European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1520-765X $g Roč. 22, Suppl F (2020), s. F14-F22
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32694949 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201204093654 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1591750 $s 1112714
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 22 $c Suppl F $d F14-F22 $e 20200715 $i 1520-765X $m European heart journal supplements $n Eur Heart J Suppl $x MED00005247
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125