Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing

A. Mala, P. Osmancik, D. Herman, K. Curila, P. Stros, J. Vesela, R. Prochazkova, R. Petr,

. 2020 ; 22 (Suppl F) : F14-F22. [pub] 20200715

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Periprocedural ECG could determine the correct lead location. The aim of the current analysis is to characterize ECG criteria associated with a correct position of the right ventricular (RV) lead in the mid-septum. Patients with indications for a pacemaker had the RV lead implanted in the apex (Group A) or mid-septum using the standard fluoroscopic criteria. The exact position of the RV lead was verified using computed tomography. Based on the findings, the mid-septal group was divided into two subgroups: (i) true septum, i.e. lead was found in the mid-septum, and (ii) false septum, i.e. lead was in the adjacent areas (anterior wall, anteroseptal groove). Paced ECGs were acquired from all patients and multiple criteria were analysed. Paced ECGs from 106 patients were analysed (27 in A, 36 in true septum, and 43 in false septum group). Group A had a significantly wider QRS, more left-deviated axis and later transition zone compared with the true septum and false septum groups. There were no differences in presence of q in lead I, or notching in inferior or lateral leads between the three groups. QRS patterns of true septum and false septum groups were similar with only one exception of the transition zone. In the multivariate model, the only ECG parameters associated with correct lead placement in the septum was an earlier transition zone (odds ratio (OR) 2.53, P = 0.001). ECGs can be easily used to differentiate apical pacing from septal or septum-close pacing. The only ECG characteristic that could help to identify true septum lead position was the transition zone in the precordial leads. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02412176.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20022042
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201204093656.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa094 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32694949
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Mala, Anna $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Can QRS morphology be used to differentiate between true septal vs. apparently septal lead placement? An analysis of ECG of real mid-septal, apparent mid-septal, and apical pacing / $c A. Mala, P. Osmancik, D. Herman, K. Curila, P. Stros, J. Vesela, R. Prochazkova, R. Petr,
520    9_
$a The location of the pacemaker lead is based on the shape of the lead on fluoroscopy only, typically in the left and right anterior oblique positions. However, these fluoroscopy criteria are insufficient and many leads apparently considered to be in septum are in fact anchored in anterior wall. Periprocedural ECG could determine the correct lead location. The aim of the current analysis is to characterize ECG criteria associated with a correct position of the right ventricular (RV) lead in the mid-septum. Patients with indications for a pacemaker had the RV lead implanted in the apex (Group A) or mid-septum using the standard fluoroscopic criteria. The exact position of the RV lead was verified using computed tomography. Based on the findings, the mid-septal group was divided into two subgroups: (i) true septum, i.e. lead was found in the mid-septum, and (ii) false septum, i.e. lead was in the adjacent areas (anterior wall, anteroseptal groove). Paced ECGs were acquired from all patients and multiple criteria were analysed. Paced ECGs from 106 patients were analysed (27 in A, 36 in true septum, and 43 in false septum group). Group A had a significantly wider QRS, more left-deviated axis and later transition zone compared with the true septum and false septum groups. There were no differences in presence of q in lead I, or notching in inferior or lateral leads between the three groups. QRS patterns of true septum and false septum groups were similar with only one exception of the transition zone. In the multivariate model, the only ECG parameters associated with correct lead placement in the septum was an earlier transition zone (odds ratio (OR) 2.53, P = 0.001). ECGs can be easily used to differentiate apical pacing from septal or septum-close pacing. The only ECG characteristic that could help to identify true septum lead position was the transition zone in the precordial leads. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02412176.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Osmancik, Pavel $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Herman, Dalibor $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Curila, Karol $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stros, Petr $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vesela, Jana $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Prochazkova, Radka $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Petr, Robert $u Cardiocenter, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague 100 34, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00005247 $t European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1520-765X $g Roč. 22, Suppl F (2020), s. F14-F22
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32694949 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201204093654 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1591750 $s 1112714
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 22 $c Suppl F $d F14-F22 $e 20200715 $i 1520-765X $m European heart journal supplements $n Eur Heart J Suppl $x MED00005247
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...