-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Pesticide comparison of Phylloneta impressa (Araneae: Theridiidae) females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants collected from a rape field before the harvest
T. Erban, B. Sopko, M. Vaclavikova, D. Tomesova, T. Halesova, M. Rezac,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
31583818
DOI
10.1002/ps.5625
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chromatografie kapalinová MeSH
- pavouci * MeSH
- pesticidy MeSH
- pyrethriny MeSH
- tandemová hmotnostní spektrometrie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Pesticides or plant protection products (PPPs) are risky for spiders in or near agricultural landscapes. However, the risks posed by pesticides to spiders are largely understudied compared with the risks to pollinators. Here, we investigated the distribution of PPPs in adult females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants of Phylloneta impressa. RESULTS: Three sample types were collected from the tops of rapeseed on 18 July (before the harvest). Three different ultraperformance liquid chromatograph coupled with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) analyses were performed: (i) pesticides and selected metabolites; (ii) quaternary ammonium pesticides (quats); and (iii) pyrethroids. Overall, 23 compounds, 22 pesticides and the metabolite imidacloprid-urea were detected. The array of pesticides was largest in webs with prey remnants, and according to evaluation via redundancy analysis (RDA), pesticides were similar in spiders and cocoons; however, data inspection revealed differences in pesticide distribution among these samples. Clothianidin was detected in only female spiders, whereas thiamethoxam prevailed in webs with remnants of prey, and acetamiprid, thiacloprid and imidacloprid were found in all three matrices. One of the most abundant compounds was chlormequat, indicating that quats should be considered a possible risk for these spiders. None of the pyrethroids were detected despite being applied in the sampling area, indicating rapid biodegradation. By contrast, some pesticides were detected despite not being applied in the field, indicating that the source of contamination is prey or particles carried by wind and attached to webs. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results indicate the different distribution or behavior of several pesticides in the spider matrices. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023150
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210125121811.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/ps.5625 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31583818
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Erban, Tomáš, $d 1978- $u Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czechia. $7 mzk2005306687
- 245 10
- $a Pesticide comparison of Phylloneta impressa (Araneae: Theridiidae) females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants collected from a rape field before the harvest / $c T. Erban, B. Sopko, M. Vaclavikova, D. Tomesova, T. Halesova, M. Rezac,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Pesticides or plant protection products (PPPs) are risky for spiders in or near agricultural landscapes. However, the risks posed by pesticides to spiders are largely understudied compared with the risks to pollinators. Here, we investigated the distribution of PPPs in adult females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants of Phylloneta impressa. RESULTS: Three sample types were collected from the tops of rapeseed on 18 July (before the harvest). Three different ultraperformance liquid chromatograph coupled with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) analyses were performed: (i) pesticides and selected metabolites; (ii) quaternary ammonium pesticides (quats); and (iii) pyrethroids. Overall, 23 compounds, 22 pesticides and the metabolite imidacloprid-urea were detected. The array of pesticides was largest in webs with prey remnants, and according to evaluation via redundancy analysis (RDA), pesticides were similar in spiders and cocoons; however, data inspection revealed differences in pesticide distribution among these samples. Clothianidin was detected in only female spiders, whereas thiamethoxam prevailed in webs with remnants of prey, and acetamiprid, thiacloprid and imidacloprid were found in all three matrices. One of the most abundant compounds was chlormequat, indicating that quats should be considered a possible risk for these spiders. None of the pyrethroids were detected despite being applied in the sampling area, indicating rapid biodegradation. By contrast, some pesticides were detected despite not being applied in the field, indicating that the source of contamination is prey or particles carried by wind and attached to webs. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results indicate the different distribution or behavior of several pesticides in the spider matrices. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie kapalinová $7 D002853
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a pesticidy $7 D010575
- 650 _2
- $a pyrethriny $7 D011722
- 650 12
- $a pavouci $7 D013112
- 650 _2
- $a tandemová hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D053719
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Sopko, Bruno $u Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0250670
- 700 1_
- $a Vaclavikova, Marta $u ALS Limited, ALS Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Tomešová, Daniela $u ALS Limited, ALS Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0250562
- 700 1_
- $a Halešová, Taťána $u ALS Limited, ALS Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0250555
- 700 1_
- $a Řezáč, Milan, $d 1978- $u Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0094030
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006028 $t Pest management science $x 1526-4998 $g Roč. 76, č. 3 (2020), s. 1128-1133
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31583818 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210125121809 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595469 $s 1113826
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 76 $c 3 $d 1128-1133 $e 20191101 $i 1526-4998 $m Pest management science $n Pest manag. sci. (Print) $x MED00006028
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125