• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Pesticide comparison of Phylloneta impressa (Araneae: Theridiidae) females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants collected from a rape field before the harvest

T. Erban, B. Sopko, M. Vaclavikova, D. Tomesova, T. Halesova, M. Rezac,

. 2020 ; 76 (3) : 1128-1133. [pub] 20191101

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023150

BACKGROUND: Pesticides or plant protection products (PPPs) are risky for spiders in or near agricultural landscapes. However, the risks posed by pesticides to spiders are largely understudied compared with the risks to pollinators. Here, we investigated the distribution of PPPs in adult females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants of Phylloneta impressa. RESULTS: Three sample types were collected from the tops of rapeseed on 18 July (before the harvest). Three different ultraperformance liquid chromatograph coupled with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) analyses were performed: (i) pesticides and selected metabolites; (ii) quaternary ammonium pesticides (quats); and (iii) pyrethroids. Overall, 23 compounds, 22 pesticides and the metabolite imidacloprid-urea were detected. The array of pesticides was largest in webs with prey remnants, and according to evaluation via redundancy analysis (RDA), pesticides were similar in spiders and cocoons; however, data inspection revealed differences in pesticide distribution among these samples. Clothianidin was detected in only female spiders, whereas thiamethoxam prevailed in webs with remnants of prey, and acetamiprid, thiacloprid and imidacloprid were found in all three matrices. One of the most abundant compounds was chlormequat, indicating that quats should be considered a possible risk for these spiders. None of the pyrethroids were detected despite being applied in the sampling area, indicating rapid biodegradation. By contrast, some pesticides were detected despite not being applied in the field, indicating that the source of contamination is prey or particles carried by wind and attached to webs. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results indicate the different distribution or behavior of several pesticides in the spider matrices. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023150
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210125121811.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/ps.5625 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31583818
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Erban, Tomáš, $d 1978- $u Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czechia. $7 mzk2005306687
245    10
$a Pesticide comparison of Phylloneta impressa (Araneae: Theridiidae) females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants collected from a rape field before the harvest / $c T. Erban, B. Sopko, M. Vaclavikova, D. Tomesova, T. Halesova, M. Rezac,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Pesticides or plant protection products (PPPs) are risky for spiders in or near agricultural landscapes. However, the risks posed by pesticides to spiders are largely understudied compared with the risks to pollinators. Here, we investigated the distribution of PPPs in adult females, cocoons and webs with prey remnants of Phylloneta impressa. RESULTS: Three sample types were collected from the tops of rapeseed on 18 July (before the harvest). Three different ultraperformance liquid chromatograph coupled with triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (UHPLC-QqQ-MS/MS) analyses were performed: (i) pesticides and selected metabolites; (ii) quaternary ammonium pesticides (quats); and (iii) pyrethroids. Overall, 23 compounds, 22 pesticides and the metabolite imidacloprid-urea were detected. The array of pesticides was largest in webs with prey remnants, and according to evaluation via redundancy analysis (RDA), pesticides were similar in spiders and cocoons; however, data inspection revealed differences in pesticide distribution among these samples. Clothianidin was detected in only female spiders, whereas thiamethoxam prevailed in webs with remnants of prey, and acetamiprid, thiacloprid and imidacloprid were found in all three matrices. One of the most abundant compounds was chlormequat, indicating that quats should be considered a possible risk for these spiders. None of the pyrethroids were detected despite being applied in the sampling area, indicating rapid biodegradation. By contrast, some pesticides were detected despite not being applied in the field, indicating that the source of contamination is prey or particles carried by wind and attached to webs. CONCLUSION: Overall, the results indicate the different distribution or behavior of several pesticides in the spider matrices. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a chromatografie kapalinová $7 D002853
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a pesticidy $7 D010575
650    _2
$a pyrethriny $7 D011722
650    12
$a pavouci $7 D013112
650    _2
$a tandemová hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D053719
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sopko, Bruno $u Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0250670
700    1_
$a Vaclavikova, Marta $u ALS Limited, ALS Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Tomešová, Daniela $u ALS Limited, ALS Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0250562
700    1_
$a Halešová, Taťána $u ALS Limited, ALS Czech Republic, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0250555
700    1_
$a Řezáč, Milan, $d 1978- $u Crop Research Institute, Prague, Czechia. $7 xx0094030
773    0_
$w MED00006028 $t Pest management science $x 1526-4998 $g Roč. 76, č. 3 (2020), s. 1128-1133
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31583818 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210125121809 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595469 $s 1113826
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 76 $c 3 $d 1128-1133 $e 20191101 $i 1526-4998 $m Pest management science $n Pest manag. sci. (Print) $x MED00006028
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace