-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Frequent issues and lessons learned from EuroFlow QA
T. Kalina, N. Brdickova, H. Glier, P. Fernandez, M. Bitter, J. Flores-Montero, JJM. van Dongen, A. Orfao,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- laboratoře normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie normy MeSH
- referenční standardy MeSH
- testování odbornosti laboratoří metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
EuroFlow Quality Assessment was designed to provide a feedback on the quality of the standardization effort in executing the EuroFlow protocols for sample preparation and instrument setup. It was first beta-tested by the members of the EuroFlow consortium internally (2010-2013) and opened to the external participants from 2015 onwards. The goal of participation in the EuroFlow QA is to evaluate whether the technical quality of the data generated by the laboratory is comparable to the data of the EuroFlow members and thus if a non-EuroFlow member participant can use the EuroFlow reference sample database for his own patient evaluation. Also it assesses whether data are sufficiently standardized for automated population gating and alarm notification. By spring 2018, a total 87 laboratories from 32 countries on five continents have registered for the EuroFlow QA program. We evaluated 163 results of 2015-2016 QA rounds, where we noted clear improvement in the score of first-time participants (median score of 91% correct) when they participated second time or later (median score of 94% correct, p = 0,017), which was comparable to EuroFlow member scores (median score of 97% correct). Among frequent mistakes, we found non-adherence to the EuroFlow protocols (improper reagent used), improper gating and some compensation issues. In summary, we show that EuroFlow QA has a positive impact on improvement of standardized data quality of non-member laboratories adhering to the EuroFlow standard operating procedures and reagent panels.
Cancer Research Centre Salamanca Spain
Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion Leiden The Netherlands
FACS Stem cell Laboratory Institute of Laboratory Medicine Kantonsspital Aarau AG Aarau Switzerland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023412
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214125953.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jim.2018.09.008 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30237053
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kalina, Tomas $u CLIP Cytometry, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tomas.kalina@lfmotol.cuni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Frequent issues and lessons learned from EuroFlow QA / $c T. Kalina, N. Brdickova, H. Glier, P. Fernandez, M. Bitter, J. Flores-Montero, JJM. van Dongen, A. Orfao,
- 520 9_
- $a EuroFlow Quality Assessment was designed to provide a feedback on the quality of the standardization effort in executing the EuroFlow protocols for sample preparation and instrument setup. It was first beta-tested by the members of the EuroFlow consortium internally (2010-2013) and opened to the external participants from 2015 onwards. The goal of participation in the EuroFlow QA is to evaluate whether the technical quality of the data generated by the laboratory is comparable to the data of the EuroFlow members and thus if a non-EuroFlow member participant can use the EuroFlow reference sample database for his own patient evaluation. Also it assesses whether data are sufficiently standardized for automated population gating and alarm notification. By spring 2018, a total 87 laboratories from 32 countries on five continents have registered for the EuroFlow QA program. We evaluated 163 results of 2015-2016 QA rounds, where we noted clear improvement in the score of first-time participants (median score of 91% correct) when they participated second time or later (median score of 94% correct, p = 0,017), which was comparable to EuroFlow member scores (median score of 97% correct). Among frequent mistakes, we found non-adherence to the EuroFlow protocols (improper reagent used), improper gating and some compensation issues. In summary, we show that EuroFlow QA has a positive impact on improvement of standardized data quality of non-member laboratories adhering to the EuroFlow standard operating procedures and reagent panels.
- 650 _2
- $a průtoková cytometrie $x normy $7 D005434
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a laboratoře $x normy $7 D007753
- 650 _2
- $a testování odbornosti laboratoří $x metody $7 D059021
- 650 _2
- $a referenční standardy $7 D012015
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Brdickova, Nadezda $u CLIP Cytometry, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Glier, Hana $u FACS/Stem cell Laboratory, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Fernandez, Paula $u FACS/Stem cell Laboratory, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Bitter, Marieke $u Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion (IHB), Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Flores-Montero, Juan $u Cancer Research Centre (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS Research Support Platform), University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a van Dongen, Jacques J M $u Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion (IHB), Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: J.J.M.van_Dongen@lumc.nl.
- 700 1_
- $a Orfao, Alberto $u Cancer Research Centre (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS Research Support Platform), University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca, Spain.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010028 $t Journal of immunological methods $x 1872-7905 $g Roč. 475, č. - (2019), s. 112520
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30237053 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214125952 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595731 $s 1114088
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 475 $c - $d 112520 $e 20180917 $i 1872-7905 $m Journal of immunological methods $n J Immunol Methods $x MED00010028
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125