• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Frequent issues and lessons learned from EuroFlow QA

T. Kalina, N. Brdickova, H. Glier, P. Fernandez, M. Bitter, J. Flores-Montero, JJM. van Dongen, A. Orfao,

. 2019 ; 475 (-) : 112520. [pub] 20180917

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023412

EuroFlow Quality Assessment was designed to provide a feedback on the quality of the standardization effort in executing the EuroFlow protocols for sample preparation and instrument setup. It was first beta-tested by the members of the EuroFlow consortium internally (2010-2013) and opened to the external participants from 2015 onwards. The goal of participation in the EuroFlow QA is to evaluate whether the technical quality of the data generated by the laboratory is comparable to the data of the EuroFlow members and thus if a non-EuroFlow member participant can use the EuroFlow reference sample database for his own patient evaluation. Also it assesses whether data are sufficiently standardized for automated population gating and alarm notification. By spring 2018, a total 87 laboratories from 32 countries on five continents have registered for the EuroFlow QA program. We evaluated 163 results of 2015-2016 QA rounds, where we noted clear improvement in the score of first-time participants (median score of 91% correct) when they participated second time or later (median score of 94% correct, p = 0,017), which was comparable to EuroFlow member scores (median score of 97% correct). Among frequent mistakes, we found non-adherence to the EuroFlow protocols (improper reagent used), improper gating and some compensation issues. In summary, we show that EuroFlow QA has a positive impact on improvement of standardized data quality of non-member laboratories adhering to the EuroFlow standard operating procedures and reagent panels.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023412
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214125953.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jim.2018.09.008 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30237053
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kalina, Tomas $u CLIP Cytometry, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: tomas.kalina@lfmotol.cuni.cz.
245    10
$a Frequent issues and lessons learned from EuroFlow QA / $c T. Kalina, N. Brdickova, H. Glier, P. Fernandez, M. Bitter, J. Flores-Montero, JJM. van Dongen, A. Orfao,
520    9_
$a EuroFlow Quality Assessment was designed to provide a feedback on the quality of the standardization effort in executing the EuroFlow protocols for sample preparation and instrument setup. It was first beta-tested by the members of the EuroFlow consortium internally (2010-2013) and opened to the external participants from 2015 onwards. The goal of participation in the EuroFlow QA is to evaluate whether the technical quality of the data generated by the laboratory is comparable to the data of the EuroFlow members and thus if a non-EuroFlow member participant can use the EuroFlow reference sample database for his own patient evaluation. Also it assesses whether data are sufficiently standardized for automated population gating and alarm notification. By spring 2018, a total 87 laboratories from 32 countries on five continents have registered for the EuroFlow QA program. We evaluated 163 results of 2015-2016 QA rounds, where we noted clear improvement in the score of first-time participants (median score of 91% correct) when they participated second time or later (median score of 94% correct, p = 0,017), which was comparable to EuroFlow member scores (median score of 97% correct). Among frequent mistakes, we found non-adherence to the EuroFlow protocols (improper reagent used), improper gating and some compensation issues. In summary, we show that EuroFlow QA has a positive impact on improvement of standardized data quality of non-member laboratories adhering to the EuroFlow standard operating procedures and reagent panels.
650    _2
$a průtoková cytometrie $x normy $7 D005434
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laboratoře $x normy $7 D007753
650    _2
$a testování odbornosti laboratoří $x metody $7 D059021
650    _2
$a referenční standardy $7 D012015
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Brdickova, Nadezda $u CLIP Cytometry, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Glier, Hana $u FACS/Stem cell Laboratory, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Fernandez, Paula $u FACS/Stem cell Laboratory, Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Aarau, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Bitter, Marieke $u Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion (IHB), Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Flores-Montero, Juan $u Cancer Research Centre (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS Research Support Platform), University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca, Spain.
700    1_
$a van Dongen, Jacques J M $u Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion (IHB), Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: J.J.M.van_Dongen@lumc.nl.
700    1_
$a Orfao, Alberto $u Cancer Research Centre (IBMCC, USAL-CSIC), Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service (NUCLEUS Research Support Platform), University of Salamanca (USAL), Salamanca, Spain.
773    0_
$w MED00010028 $t Journal of immunological methods $x 1872-7905 $g Roč. 475, č. - (2019), s. 112520
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30237053 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214125952 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595731 $s 1114088
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 475 $c - $d 112520 $e 20180917 $i 1872-7905 $m Journal of immunological methods $n J Immunol Methods $x MED00010028
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...