Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

MH. Kollef, M. Nováček, Ü. Kivistik, Á. Réa-Neto, N. Shime, I. Martin-Loeches, JF. Timsit, RG. Wunderink, CJ. Bruno, JA. Huntington, G. Lin, B. Yu, JR. Butterton, EG. Rhee,

. 2019 ; 19 (12) : 1299-1311. [pub] 20190925

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2001-08-01 to 2 months ago

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial pneumonia due to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens is associated with high mortality. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination antibacterial drug ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at 263 hospitals in 34 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, were undergoing mechanical ventilation, and had nosocomial pneumonia (either ventilator-associated pneumonia or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with block randomisation (block size four), stratified by type of nosocomial pneumonia and age (<65 years vs ≥65 years), to receive either 3 g ceftolozane-tazobactam or 1 g meropenem intravenously every 8 h for 8-14 days. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality (at a 10% non-inferiority margin). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after the end of therapy; 12·5% non-inferiority margin). Both endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Investigators, study staff, patients, and patients' representatives were masked to treatment assignment. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received study treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02070757. FINDINGS: Between Jan 16, 2015, and April 27, 2018, 726 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 362 to the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 364 to the meropenem group. Overall, 519 (71%) patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia, 239 (33%) had Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of at least 20, and 668 (92%) were in the intensive care unit. At 28 days, 87 (24·0%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 92 (25·3%) in the meropenem group had died (weighted treatment difference 1·1% [95% CI -5·1 to 7·4]). At the test-of-cure visit 197 (54%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 194 (53%) in the meropenem group were clinically cured (weighted treatment difference 1·1% [95% CI -6·2 to 8·3]). Ceftolozane-tazobactam was thus non-inferior to meropenem in terms of both 28-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure at test of cure. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 38 (11%) of 361 patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 27 (8%) of 359 in the meropenem group. Eight (2%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and two (1%) in the meropenem group had serious treatment-related adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: High-dose ceftolozane-tazobactam is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a high-risk, critically ill population. FUNDING: Merck & Co.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023424
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214130014.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30403-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31563344
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kollef, Marin H $u Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
245    10
$a Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial / $c MH. Kollef, M. Nováček, Ü. Kivistik, Á. Réa-Neto, N. Shime, I. Martin-Loeches, JF. Timsit, RG. Wunderink, CJ. Bruno, JA. Huntington, G. Lin, B. Yu, JR. Butterton, EG. Rhee,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Nosocomial pneumonia due to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens is associated with high mortality. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination antibacterial drug ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at 263 hospitals in 34 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, were undergoing mechanical ventilation, and had nosocomial pneumonia (either ventilator-associated pneumonia or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with block randomisation (block size four), stratified by type of nosocomial pneumonia and age (<65 years vs ≥65 years), to receive either 3 g ceftolozane-tazobactam or 1 g meropenem intravenously every 8 h for 8-14 days. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality (at a 10% non-inferiority margin). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after the end of therapy; 12·5% non-inferiority margin). Both endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Investigators, study staff, patients, and patients' representatives were masked to treatment assignment. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received study treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02070757. FINDINGS: Between Jan 16, 2015, and April 27, 2018, 726 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 362 to the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 364 to the meropenem group. Overall, 519 (71%) patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia, 239 (33%) had Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of at least 20, and 668 (92%) were in the intensive care unit. At 28 days, 87 (24·0%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 92 (25·3%) in the meropenem group had died (weighted treatment difference 1·1% [95% CI -5·1 to 7·4]). At the test-of-cure visit 197 (54%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 194 (53%) in the meropenem group were clinically cured (weighted treatment difference 1·1% [95% CI -6·2 to 8·3]). Ceftolozane-tazobactam was thus non-inferior to meropenem in terms of both 28-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure at test of cure. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 38 (11%) of 361 patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 27 (8%) of 359 in the meropenem group. Eight (2%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and two (1%) in the meropenem group had serious treatment-related adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: High-dose ceftolozane-tazobactam is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a high-risk, critically ill population. FUNDING: Merck & Co.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a antibakteriální látky $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000900
650    _2
$a cefalosporiny $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D002511
650    _2
$a infekce spojené se zdravotní péčí $x farmakoterapie $x mikrobiologie $7 D003428
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a meropenem $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077731
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a bakteriální pneumonie $x farmakoterapie $x mikrobiologie $7 D018410
650    _2
$a tazobaktam $x farmakologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000078142
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Nováček, Martin $u General Hospital of Kolin, Kolin, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kivistik, Ülo $u North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Réa-Neto, Álvaro $u Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil.
700    1_
$a Shime, Nobuaki $u Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
700    1_
$a Martin-Loeches, Ignacio $u St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Universitat de Barcelona, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas August Pi i Sunyer, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Timsit, Jean-François $u Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Wunderink, Richard G $u Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
700    1_
$a Bruno, Christopher J $u Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
700    1_
$a Huntington, Jennifer A $u Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
700    1_
$a Lin, Gina $u Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
700    1_
$a Yu, Brian $u Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
700    1_
$a Butterton, Joan R $u Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
700    1_
$a Rhee, Elizabeth G $u Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Electronic address: elizabeth.rhee@merck.com.
773    0_
$w MED00006437 $t The Lancet. Infectious diseases $x 1474-4457 $g Roč. 19, č. 12 (2019), s. 1299-1311
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31563344 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214130013 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595743 $s 1114100
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 19 $c 12 $d 1299-1311 $e 20190925 $i 1474-4457 $m Lancet. Infectious diseases $n Lancet Infect Dis $x MED00006437
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...