• Something wrong with this record ?

Prognostic Value of MicroRNAs in Patients after Myocardial Infarction: A Substudy of PRAGUE-18

M. Hromádka, V. Černá, M. Pešta, A. Kučerová, J. Jarkovský, D. Rajdl, R. Rokyta, Z. Moťovská,

. 2019 ; 2019 (-) : 2925019. [pub] 20191103

Language English Country United States

Document type Clinical Trial, Phase IV, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: The evaluation of the long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac death in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an established clinical process. Laboratory markers may significantly help with the risk stratification of these patients. Our objective was to find the relation of selected microRNAs to the standard markers of AMI and determine if these microRNAs can be used to identify patients at increased risk. Methods: Selected microRNAs (miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-499) were measured in a cohort of 122 patients from the PRAGUE-18 study (ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in AMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI)). The cohort was split into two subgroups: 116 patients who did not die (survivors) and 6 patients who died (nonsurvivors) during the 365-day period after AMI. Plasma levels of selected circulating miRNAs were then assessed in combination with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Results: miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-499 correlated positively with NT-proBNP and hsTnT 24 hours after admission and negatively with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Both miR-1 and miR-133a positively correlated with hsTnT at admission. Median relative levels of all selected miRNAs were higher in the subgroup of nonsurvivors (N = 6) in comparison with survivors (N = 116), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. All patients in the nonsurvivor subgroup had miR-499 and NT-proBNP levels above the cut-off values (891.5 ng/L for NT-proBNP and 0.088 for miR-499), whereas in the survivor subgroup, only 28.4% of patients were above the cut-off values (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Statistically significant correlation was found between miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-499 and hsTnT, NT-proBNP, and LVEF. In addition, this analysis suggests that plasma levels of circulating miR-499 could contribute to the identification of patients at increased risk of death during the first year after AMI, especially when combined with NT-proBNP levels.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023503
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210319150618.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1155/2019/2925019 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31781298
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hromádka, M $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Prognostic Value of MicroRNAs in Patients after Myocardial Infarction: A Substudy of PRAGUE-18 / $c M. Hromádka, V. Černá, M. Pešta, A. Kučerová, J. Jarkovský, D. Rajdl, R. Rokyta, Z. Moťovská,
520    9_
$a Background: The evaluation of the long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac death in patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an established clinical process. Laboratory markers may significantly help with the risk stratification of these patients. Our objective was to find the relation of selected microRNAs to the standard markers of AMI and determine if these microRNAs can be used to identify patients at increased risk. Methods: Selected microRNAs (miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-499) were measured in a cohort of 122 patients from the PRAGUE-18 study (ticagrelor vs. prasugrel in AMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI)). The cohort was split into two subgroups: 116 patients who did not die (survivors) and 6 patients who died (nonsurvivors) during the 365-day period after AMI. Plasma levels of selected circulating miRNAs were then assessed in combination with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Results: miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-499 correlated positively with NT-proBNP and hsTnT 24 hours after admission and negatively with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Both miR-1 and miR-133a positively correlated with hsTnT at admission. Median relative levels of all selected miRNAs were higher in the subgroup of nonsurvivors (N = 6) in comparison with survivors (N = 116), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. All patients in the nonsurvivor subgroup had miR-499 and NT-proBNP levels above the cut-off values (891.5 ng/L for NT-proBNP and 0.088 for miR-499), whereas in the survivor subgroup, only 28.4% of patients were above the cut-off values (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Statistically significant correlation was found between miR-1, miR-133a, and miR-499 and hsTnT, NT-proBNP, and LVEF. In addition, this analysis suggests that plasma levels of circulating miR-499 could contribute to the identification of patients at increased risk of death during the first year after AMI, especially when combined with NT-proBNP levels.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a biologické markery $x analýza $7 D015415
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    12
$a regulace genové exprese u nádorů $7 D015972
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mikro RNA $x genetika $7 D035683
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a infarkt myokardu $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $x mortalita $7 D009203
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze IV $7 D017429
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Černá, V $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pešta, M $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kučerová, A $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jarkovský, J $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine and the Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rajdl, D $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Hematology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rokyta, Richard, $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine of Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. $d 1965- $7 nlk20050170777
700    1_
$a Moťovská, Z $u Cardiocentre, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001413 $t Disease markers $x 1875-8630 $g Roč. 2019, č. - (2019), s. 2925019
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31781298 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210319150616 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1595822 $s 1114179
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 2019 $c - $d 2925019 $e 20191103 $i 1875-8630 $m Disease markers $n Dis Markers $x MED00001413
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...