-
Something wrong with this record ?
The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care
V. Fejfarová, J. Pavlů, R. Bém, V. Wosková, M. Dubský, A. Němcová, A. Jirkovská, B. Sixta, K. Sutoris, F. Thieme, DG. Armstrong, E. Vrátná, J. Hazdrová, V. Lánská,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study
PubMed
31637262
DOI
10.1155/2019/5945839
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Amputation, Surgical * adverse effects MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents administration & dosage MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Length of Stay MeSH
- Equipment Design MeSH
- Diabetic Foot pathology physiopathology therapy MeSH
- Splints * adverse effects MeSH
- Wound Healing * MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Device Removal * MeSH
- Orthopedic Procedures * adverse effects MeSH
- Postoperative Care instrumentation MeSH
- Reoperation MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Wheelchairs MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Weight-Bearing MeSH
- Patient Readmission MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Objective: Off-loading is one of the crucial components of diabetic foot (DF) therapy. However, there remains a paucity of studies on the most suitable off-loading for DF patients under postoperative care. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of different protective off-loading devices on healing and postoperative complications in DF patients following limb preservation surgery. Methods: This observational study comprised 127 DF patients. All enrolled patients had undergone foot surgery and were off-loaded empirically as follows: wheelchair+removable contact splint (RCS) (group R: 29.2%), wheelchair only (group W: 48%), and wheelchair+removable prefabricated device (group WP: 22.8%). We compared the primary (e.g., the number of healed patients, healing time, and duration of antibiotic (ATB) therapy) and secondary outcomes (e.g., number of reamputations and number and duration of rehospitalizations) with regard to the operation regions across all study groups. Results: The lowest number of postoperative complications (number of reamputations: p = 0.028; rehospitalizations: p = 0.0085; and major amputations: p = 0.02) was in group R compared to groups W and WP. There was a strong trend toward a higher percentage of healed patients (78.4% vs. 55.7% and 65.5%; p = 0.068) over a shorter duration (13.7 vs. 16.5 and 20.3 weeks; p = 0.055) in the R group, as well. Furthermore, our subanalysis revealed better primary outcomes in patients operated in the midfoot and better secondary outcomes in patients after forefoot surgery-odds ratios favouring the R group included healing at 2.5 (95% CI, 1.04-6.15; p = 0.037), reamputations at 0.32 (95% CI, 0.12-0.84; p = 0.018), and rehospitalizations at 0.22 (95% CI, 0.08-0.58; p = 0.0013). Conclusions: This observational study suggests that removable contact splint combined with a wheelchair is better than a wheelchair with or without removable off-loading device for accelerating wound healing after surgical procedures; it also minimises overall postoperative complications, reducing the number of reamputations by up to 77% and the number of rehospitalizations by up to 66%.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023677
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250507093313.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125e20190915xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1155/2019/5945839 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31637262
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Fejfarová, Vladimíra $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 14
- $a The Superiority of Removable Contact Splints in the Healing of Diabetic Foot during Postoperative Care / $c V. Fejfarová, J. Pavlů, R. Bém, V. Wosková, M. Dubský, A. Němcová, A. Jirkovská, B. Sixta, K. Sutoris, F. Thieme, DG. Armstrong, E. Vrátná, J. Hazdrová, V. Lánská,
- 520 9_
- $a Objective: Off-loading is one of the crucial components of diabetic foot (DF) therapy. However, there remains a paucity of studies on the most suitable off-loading for DF patients under postoperative care. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of different protective off-loading devices on healing and postoperative complications in DF patients following limb preservation surgery. Methods: This observational study comprised 127 DF patients. All enrolled patients had undergone foot surgery and were off-loaded empirically as follows: wheelchair+removable contact splint (RCS) (group R: 29.2%), wheelchair only (group W: 48%), and wheelchair+removable prefabricated device (group WP: 22.8%). We compared the primary (e.g., the number of healed patients, healing time, and duration of antibiotic (ATB) therapy) and secondary outcomes (e.g., number of reamputations and number and duration of rehospitalizations) with regard to the operation regions across all study groups. Results: The lowest number of postoperative complications (number of reamputations: p = 0.028; rehospitalizations: p = 0.0085; and major amputations: p = 0.02) was in group R compared to groups W and WP. There was a strong trend toward a higher percentage of healed patients (78.4% vs. 55.7% and 65.5%; p = 0.068) over a shorter duration (13.7 vs. 16.5 and 20.3 weeks; p = 0.055) in the R group, as well. Furthermore, our subanalysis revealed better primary outcomes in patients operated in the midfoot and better secondary outcomes in patients after forefoot surgery-odds ratios favouring the R group included healing at 2.5 (95% CI, 1.04-6.15; p = 0.037), reamputations at 0.32 (95% CI, 0.12-0.84; p = 0.018), and rehospitalizations at 0.22 (95% CI, 0.08-0.58; p = 0.0013). Conclusions: This observational study suggests that removable contact splint combined with a wheelchair is better than a wheelchair with or without removable off-loading device for accelerating wound healing after surgical procedures; it also minimises overall postoperative complications, reducing the number of reamputations by up to 77% and the number of rehospitalizations by up to 66%.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a amputace $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000671
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000900
- 650 12
- $a odstranění implantátu $7 D020878
- 650 _2
- $a diabetická noha $x patologie $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D017719
- 650 _2
- $a design vybavení $7 D004867
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $7 D007902
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a ortopedické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019637
- 650 _2
- $a znovupřijetí pacienta $7 D010359
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační péče $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D011182
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 12
- $a dlahy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013165
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému $7 D016474
- 650 _2
- $a vozíky pro invalidy $7 D014910
- 650 12
- $a hojení ran $7 D014945
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
- 700 1_
- $a Pavlů, Jaroslav $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bém, Robert $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wosková, Veronika $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dubský, Michal $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Němcová, Andrea $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0231185
- 700 1_
- $a Jirkovská, Alexandra $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sixta, Bedřich $u Department of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sutoris, Karol $u Department of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Thieme, Filip $u Department of Transplant Surgery, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Armstrong, David G $u Southwestern Academic Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA), University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Vrátná, Eliška $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hazdrová, Jitka $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lánská, Věra $u Diabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181720 $t Journal of diabetes research $x 2314-6753 $g Roč. 2019 (20190915), s. 5945839
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31637262 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250507093311 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1595996 $s 1114353
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 2019 $c - $d 5945839 $e 20190915 $i 2314-6753 $m Journal of diabetes research $n J Diabetes Res $x MED00181720
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125