Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Propofol versus sevoflurane anaesthesia: effect on cognitive decline and event-related potentials

J. Kletecka, I. Holeckova, P. Brenkus, J. Pouska, J. Benes, I. Chytra,

. 2019 ; 33 (4) : 665-673. [pub] 20181031

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023774

Grantová podpora
PROGRES Q39, PRVOUK P36 Lékařská Fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2004-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2007-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2004-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2004-02-01 do Před 1 rokem

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is diagnosed in up to 30% patients after anaesthesia. The causative role of anaesthetic toxicity remains unclear. Using clinical tests, no clear-cut differences have been observed between anaesthetics so far. The aim of this trial was to compare the incidence of POCD diagnosed by a battery of neuropsychologic tests after propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia. Secondary goal was to examine possible relationship between POCD positivity and changes in auditory event-related potentials (ERPs). Sixty patients undergoing lumbar discectomy were prospectively randomized to receive depth-controlled sevoflurane (SEVO) or propofol (PROP) based anaesthesia. The neuropsychological examination and auditory event-related potentials (N1, P3a and P3b components) recording was performed preoperatively and on days 1, 6 and 42 after surgery. POCD was defined as a decline of more than one standard deviation in three or more tests. In 43 patients (20 in PROP and 23 in SEVO group) all selected tests were performed and used for the evaluation. POCD was present in 48%/60%, 18%/20% and 17%/11% (SEVO/PROP) of patients on days 1, 6 and 42 after surgery, with no significant intergroup difference. Among neuropsychologic tests, the most significant decline was observed in Semantic Verbal Fluency and Letter-Number Sequencing Test scores, congruently in both groups on days 1 and 6, with full recovery on the last control. Transient deteriorations in other tests were observed as well. No association of POCD positivity and ERPs changes was found, although long-term modifications of P3a and P3b components were observed, mainly in SEVO group. In our study, sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia was associated with the similar incidence of POCD. Cognitive decline, mainly affecting executive functions, was temporary in most of the patients. Prolonged ERPs alterations after the anaesthesia seem not to have any relationship with the impairment registered by the neuropsychological examination and may represent subclinical changes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023774
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214131132.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10877-018-0213-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30382499
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kletecka, Jakub $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, The University Hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen - Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Plzen, Czech Republic. kleteckaj@fnplzen.cz.
245    10
$a Propofol versus sevoflurane anaesthesia: effect on cognitive decline and event-related potentials / $c J. Kletecka, I. Holeckova, P. Brenkus, J. Pouska, J. Benes, I. Chytra,
520    9_
$a Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is diagnosed in up to 30% patients after anaesthesia. The causative role of anaesthetic toxicity remains unclear. Using clinical tests, no clear-cut differences have been observed between anaesthetics so far. The aim of this trial was to compare the incidence of POCD diagnosed by a battery of neuropsychologic tests after propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia. Secondary goal was to examine possible relationship between POCD positivity and changes in auditory event-related potentials (ERPs). Sixty patients undergoing lumbar discectomy were prospectively randomized to receive depth-controlled sevoflurane (SEVO) or propofol (PROP) based anaesthesia. The neuropsychological examination and auditory event-related potentials (N1, P3a and P3b components) recording was performed preoperatively and on days 1, 6 and 42 after surgery. POCD was defined as a decline of more than one standard deviation in three or more tests. In 43 patients (20 in PROP and 23 in SEVO group) all selected tests were performed and used for the evaluation. POCD was present in 48%/60%, 18%/20% and 17%/11% (SEVO/PROP) of patients on days 1, 6 and 42 after surgery, with no significant intergroup difference. Among neuropsychologic tests, the most significant decline was observed in Semantic Verbal Fluency and Letter-Number Sequencing Test scores, congruently in both groups on days 1 and 6, with full recovery on the last control. Transient deteriorations in other tests were observed as well. No association of POCD positivity and ERPs changes was found, although long-term modifications of P3a and P3b components were observed, mainly in SEVO group. In our study, sevoflurane and propofol anaesthesia was associated with the similar incidence of POCD. Cognitive decline, mainly affecting executive functions, was temporary in most of the patients. Prolonged ERPs alterations after the anaesthesia seem not to have any relationship with the impairment registered by the neuropsychological examination and may represent subclinical changes.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a anestezie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D000758
650    _2
$a anestetika inhalační $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D018685
650    _2
$a anestetika intravenózní $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D018686
650    _2
$a kognitivní dysfunkce $x chemicky indukované $7 D060825
650    _2
$a evokované potenciály $x účinky léků $7 D005071
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a incidence $7 D015994
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a propofol $x terapeutické užití $7 D015742
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a sevofluran $x terapeutické užití $7 D000077149
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Holeckova, Irena $u Department of Neurosurgery, The University Hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen - Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Brenkus, Pavel $u Department of Neurology, The University Hospital in Plzen, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pouska, Jiri $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, The University Hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen - Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Benes, Jan $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, The University Hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen - Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Plzen, Czech Republic. Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 76, 304 60, Plzen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Chytra, Ivan $u Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, The University Hospital and The Faculty of Medicine in Plzen - Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Plzen, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00007683 $t Journal of clinical monitoring and computing $x 1573-2614 $g Roč. 33, č. 4 (2019), s. 665-673
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30382499 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214131131 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1596093 $s 1114450
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 33 $c 4 $d 665-673 $e 20181031 $i 1573-2614 $m Journal of clinical monitoring and computing $n J Clin Monit Comput $x MED00007683
GRA    __
$a PROGRES Q39, PRVOUK P36 $p Lékařská Fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...