-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir
FR. Thistlethwaite, B. Ratcliffe, J. Klápště, I. Porth, C. Chen, MU. Stoehr, YA. El-Kassaby,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011 do Před 1 rokem
ProQuest Central
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1947-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- genomika MeSH
- lineární modely MeSH
- modely genetické MeSH
- Pseudotsuga genetika růst a vývoj MeSH
- šlechtění rostlin MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Britská Kolumbie MeSH
Here, we perform cross-generational GS analysis on coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), reflecting trans-generational selective breeding application. A total of 1321 trees, representing 37 full-sib F1 families from 3 environments in British Columbia, Canada, were used as the training population for (1) EBVs (estimated breeding values) of juvenile height (HTJ) in the F1 generation predicting genomic EBVs of HTJ of 136 individuals in the F2 generation, (2) deregressed EBVs of F1 HTJ predicting deregressed genomic EBVs of F2 HTJ, (3) F1 mature height (HT35) predicting HTJ EBVs in F2, and (4) deregressed F1 HT35 predicting genomic deregressed HTJ EBVs in F2. Ridge regression best linear unbiased predictor (RR-BLUP), generalized ridge regression (GRR), and Bayes-B GS methods were used and compared to pedigree-based (ABLUP) predictions. GS accuracies for scenarios 1 (0.92, 0.91, and 0.91) and 3 (0.57, 0.56, and 0.58) were similar to their ABLUP counterparts (0.92 and 0.60, respectively) (using RR-BLUP, GRR, and Bayes-B). Results using deregressed values fell dramatically for both scenarios 2 and 4 which approached zero in many cases. Cross-generational GS validation of juvenile height in Douglas-fir produced predictive accuracies almost as high as that of ABLUP. Without capturing LD, GS cannot surpass the prediction of ABLUP. Here we tracked pedigree relatedness between training and validation sets. More markers or improved distribution of markers are required to capture LD in Douglas-fir. This is essential for accurate forward selection among siblings as markers that track pedigree are of little use for forward selection of individuals within controlled pollinated families.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023898
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214131617.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41437-018-0172-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30631145
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Thistlethwaite, Frances R $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
- 245 10
- $a Genomic selection of juvenile height across a single-generational gap in Douglas-fir / $c FR. Thistlethwaite, B. Ratcliffe, J. Klápště, I. Porth, C. Chen, MU. Stoehr, YA. El-Kassaby,
- 520 9_
- $a Here, we perform cross-generational GS analysis on coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), reflecting trans-generational selective breeding application. A total of 1321 trees, representing 37 full-sib F1 families from 3 environments in British Columbia, Canada, were used as the training population for (1) EBVs (estimated breeding values) of juvenile height (HTJ) in the F1 generation predicting genomic EBVs of HTJ of 136 individuals in the F2 generation, (2) deregressed EBVs of F1 HTJ predicting deregressed genomic EBVs of F2 HTJ, (3) F1 mature height (HT35) predicting HTJ EBVs in F2, and (4) deregressed F1 HT35 predicting genomic deregressed HTJ EBVs in F2. Ridge regression best linear unbiased predictor (RR-BLUP), generalized ridge regression (GRR), and Bayes-B GS methods were used and compared to pedigree-based (ABLUP) predictions. GS accuracies for scenarios 1 (0.92, 0.91, and 0.91) and 3 (0.57, 0.56, and 0.58) were similar to their ABLUP counterparts (0.92 and 0.60, respectively) (using RR-BLUP, GRR, and Bayes-B). Results using deregressed values fell dramatically for both scenarios 2 and 4 which approached zero in many cases. Cross-generational GS validation of juvenile height in Douglas-fir produced predictive accuracies almost as high as that of ABLUP. Without capturing LD, GS cannot surpass the prediction of ABLUP. Here we tracked pedigree relatedness between training and validation sets. More markers or improved distribution of markers are required to capture LD in Douglas-fir. This is essential for accurate forward selection among siblings as markers that track pedigree are of little use for forward selection of individuals within controlled pollinated families.
- 650 _2
- $a genomika $7 D023281
- 650 _2
- $a lineární modely $7 D016014
- 650 _2
- $a modely genetické $7 D008957
- 650 _2
- $a šlechtění rostlin $7 D000069600
- 650 _2
- $a Pseudotsuga $x genetika $x růst a vývoj $7 D028224
- 651 _2
- $a Britská Kolumbie $7 D001955
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Ratcliffe, Blaise $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Klápště, Jaroslav $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), 49 Sala Street, Whakarewarewa, Rotorua, 3046, New Zealand. Department of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha 6, 165 21, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Porth, Ilga $u Département des sciences du bois et de la forêt, Université Laval, G1V 0A6, Québec, QC, Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Charles $u Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078-3035, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Stoehr, Michael U $u British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Victoria, BC, V8W 9C2, Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a El-Kassaby, Yousry A $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, The University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. y.el-kassaby@ubc.ca.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002030 $t Heredity $x 1365-2540 $g Roč. 122, č. 6 (2019), s. 848-863
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30631145 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214131615 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1596217 $s 1114574
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 122 $c 6 $d 848-863 $e 20190110 $i 1365-2540 $m Heredity $n Heredity $x MED00002030
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125