-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study
M. Warakomska, TE. Bachman, M. Wilinska,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-02-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- automatizace MeSH
- hypoxie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- jednotky intenzivní péče o novorozence MeSH
- klinické alarmy * MeSH
- klinické křížové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- monitorování fyziologických funkcí MeSH
- nemocnice veřejné MeSH
- novorozenec nedonošený * MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- oxygenoterapie metody MeSH
- oxymetrie MeSH
- péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu metody MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- spotřeba kyslíku fyziologie MeSH
- umělé dýchání metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Polsko MeSH
BACKGROUND: Changes in oxygen saturation (SpO2) exposure have been shown to have a marked impact on neonatal outcomes and therefore careful titration of inspired oxygen is essential. In routine use, however, the frequency of SpO2 alarms not requiring intervention results in alarm fatigue and its corresponding risk. SpO2 control systems that automate oxygen adjustments (Auto-FiO2) have been shown to be safe and effective. We speculated that when using Auto-FiO2, alarm settings could be refined to reduce unnecessary alarms, without compromising safety. METHODS: An unblinded randomized crossover study was conducted in a single NICU among infants routinely managed with Auto-FiO2. During the first 6 days of respiratory support a tight and a loose alarm strategy were switched each 24 h. A balanced block randomization was used. The tight strategy set the alarms at the prescribed SpO2 target range, with a 30-s delay. The loose strategy set the alarms 2 wider, with a 90-s delay. The effectiveness outcome was the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and the safety outcomes were time at SpO2 extremes (< 80, > 98%). We hypothesized that the loose strategy would result in a marked decrease in the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and no increases at SpO2 extremes with 20 subjects. Within subject differences between alarm strategies for the primary outcomes were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: During a 13-month period 26 neonates were randomized. The analysis included 21 subjects with 49 days of both tight and loose intervention. The loose alarm strategy resulted in a reduction in the median rate of SpO2 alarms from 5.2 to 1.6 per hour (p < 0.001, 95%-CI difference 1.6-3.7). The incidence of hypoxemia and hyperoxemia were very low (less than 0.1%-time) with no difference associated with the alarm strategy (95%-CI difference less than 0.0-0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of infants we found a marked advantage of the looser alarm strategy. We conclude that the paradigms of alarm strategies used for manual titration of oxygen need to be reconsidered when using Auto-FiO2. We speculate that with optimal settings false positive SpO2 alarms can be minimized, with better vigilance of clinically relevant alarms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 15 May 2018 at ISRCTN ( 49239883 ).
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20023951
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201214131856.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31060536
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Warakomska, Malgorzata $u Department of Neonatology, Independent Public Clinical Hospital of Prof W, Orlowski 231 Czerniakowska str, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study / $c M. Warakomska, TE. Bachman, M. Wilinska,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Changes in oxygen saturation (SpO2) exposure have been shown to have a marked impact on neonatal outcomes and therefore careful titration of inspired oxygen is essential. In routine use, however, the frequency of SpO2 alarms not requiring intervention results in alarm fatigue and its corresponding risk. SpO2 control systems that automate oxygen adjustments (Auto-FiO2) have been shown to be safe and effective. We speculated that when using Auto-FiO2, alarm settings could be refined to reduce unnecessary alarms, without compromising safety. METHODS: An unblinded randomized crossover study was conducted in a single NICU among infants routinely managed with Auto-FiO2. During the first 6 days of respiratory support a tight and a loose alarm strategy were switched each 24 h. A balanced block randomization was used. The tight strategy set the alarms at the prescribed SpO2 target range, with a 30-s delay. The loose strategy set the alarms 2 wider, with a 90-s delay. The effectiveness outcome was the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and the safety outcomes were time at SpO2 extremes (< 80, > 98%). We hypothesized that the loose strategy would result in a marked decrease in the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and no increases at SpO2 extremes with 20 subjects. Within subject differences between alarm strategies for the primary outcomes were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: During a 13-month period 26 neonates were randomized. The analysis included 21 subjects with 49 days of both tight and loose intervention. The loose alarm strategy resulted in a reduction in the median rate of SpO2 alarms from 5.2 to 1.6 per hour (p < 0.001, 95%-CI difference 1.6-3.7). The incidence of hypoxemia and hyperoxemia were very low (less than 0.1%-time) with no difference associated with the alarm strategy (95%-CI difference less than 0.0-0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of infants we found a marked advantage of the looser alarm strategy. We conclude that the paradigms of alarm strategies used for manual titration of oxygen need to be reconsidered when using Auto-FiO2. We speculate that with optimal settings false positive SpO2 alarms can be minimized, with better vigilance of clinically relevant alarms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 15 May 2018 at ISRCTN ( 49239883 ).
- 650 _2
- $a automatizace $7 D001331
- 650 12
- $a klinické alarmy $7 D056902
- 650 _2
- $a péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu $x metody $7 D003422
- 650 _2
- $a klinické křížové studie $7 D018592
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a nemocnice veřejné $7 D006779
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hypoxie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D000860
- 650 _2
- $a novorozenec $7 D007231
- 650 12
- $a novorozenec nedonošený $7 D007234
- 650 _2
- $a jednotky intenzivní péče o novorozence $7 D007363
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování fyziologických funkcí $7 D008991
- 650 _2
- $a oxymetrie $7 D010092
- 650 _2
- $a spotřeba kyslíku $x fyziologie $7 D010101
- 650 _2
- $a oxygenoterapie $x metody $7 D010102
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a umělé dýchání $x metody $7 D012121
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 651 _2
- $a Polsko $7 D011044
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Bachman, Thomas E $u Department Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wilinska, Maria $u Department of Neonatology, Centre of Medical Postgraduate Education, 231 Czerniakowska str, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland. wilinska.maria@gmail.com.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008201 $t BMC pediatrics $x 1471-2431 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2019), s. 142
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31060536 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201214131856 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1596270 $s 1114627
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 19 $c 1 $d 142 $e 20190506 $i 1471-2431 $m BMC pediatrics $n BMC Pediatr $x MED00008201
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125