Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study

M. Warakomska, TE. Bachman, M. Wilinska,

. 2019 ; 19 (1) : 142. [pub] 20190506

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20023951

BACKGROUND: Changes in oxygen saturation (SpO2) exposure have been shown to have a marked impact on neonatal outcomes and therefore careful titration of inspired oxygen is essential. In routine use, however, the frequency of SpO2 alarms not requiring intervention results in alarm fatigue and its corresponding risk. SpO2 control systems that automate oxygen adjustments (Auto-FiO2) have been shown to be safe and effective. We speculated that when using Auto-FiO2, alarm settings could be refined to reduce unnecessary alarms, without compromising safety. METHODS: An unblinded randomized crossover study was conducted in a single NICU among infants routinely managed with Auto-FiO2. During the first 6 days of respiratory support a tight and a loose alarm strategy were switched each 24 h. A balanced block randomization was used. The tight strategy set the alarms at the prescribed SpO2 target range, with a 30-s delay. The loose strategy set the alarms 2 wider, with a 90-s delay. The effectiveness outcome was the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and the safety outcomes were time at SpO2 extremes (< 80, > 98%). We hypothesized that the loose strategy would result in a marked decrease in the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and no increases at SpO2 extremes with 20 subjects. Within subject differences between alarm strategies for the primary outcomes were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: During a 13-month period 26 neonates were randomized. The analysis included 21 subjects with 49 days of both tight and loose intervention. The loose alarm strategy resulted in a reduction in the median rate of SpO2 alarms from 5.2 to 1.6 per hour (p <  0.001, 95%-CI difference 1.6-3.7). The incidence of hypoxemia and hyperoxemia were very low (less than 0.1%-time) with no difference associated with the alarm strategy (95%-CI difference less than 0.0-0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of infants we found a marked advantage of the looser alarm strategy. We conclude that the paradigms of alarm strategies used for manual titration of oxygen need to be reconsidered when using Auto-FiO2. We speculate that with optimal settings false positive SpO2 alarms can be minimized, with better vigilance of clinically relevant alarms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 15 May 2018 at ISRCTN ( 49239883 ).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20023951
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201214131856.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31060536
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Warakomska, Malgorzata $u Department of Neonatology, Independent Public Clinical Hospital of Prof W, Orlowski 231 Czerniakowska str, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland.
245    10
$a Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized crossover study / $c M. Warakomska, TE. Bachman, M. Wilinska,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Changes in oxygen saturation (SpO2) exposure have been shown to have a marked impact on neonatal outcomes and therefore careful titration of inspired oxygen is essential. In routine use, however, the frequency of SpO2 alarms not requiring intervention results in alarm fatigue and its corresponding risk. SpO2 control systems that automate oxygen adjustments (Auto-FiO2) have been shown to be safe and effective. We speculated that when using Auto-FiO2, alarm settings could be refined to reduce unnecessary alarms, without compromising safety. METHODS: An unblinded randomized crossover study was conducted in a single NICU among infants routinely managed with Auto-FiO2. During the first 6 days of respiratory support a tight and a loose alarm strategy were switched each 24 h. A balanced block randomization was used. The tight strategy set the alarms at the prescribed SpO2 target range, with a 30-s delay. The loose strategy set the alarms 2 wider, with a 90-s delay. The effectiveness outcome was the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and the safety outcomes were time at SpO2 extremes (< 80, > 98%). We hypothesized that the loose strategy would result in a marked decrease in the frequency of SpO2 alarms, and no increases at SpO2 extremes with 20 subjects. Within subject differences between alarm strategies for the primary outcomes were evaluated with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: During a 13-month period 26 neonates were randomized. The analysis included 21 subjects with 49 days of both tight and loose intervention. The loose alarm strategy resulted in a reduction in the median rate of SpO2 alarms from 5.2 to 1.6 per hour (p <  0.001, 95%-CI difference 1.6-3.7). The incidence of hypoxemia and hyperoxemia were very low (less than 0.1%-time) with no difference associated with the alarm strategy (95%-CI difference less than 0.0-0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: In this group of infants we found a marked advantage of the looser alarm strategy. We conclude that the paradigms of alarm strategies used for manual titration of oxygen need to be reconsidered when using Auto-FiO2. We speculate that with optimal settings false positive SpO2 alarms can be minimized, with better vigilance of clinically relevant alarms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered 15 May 2018 at ISRCTN ( 49239883 ).
650    _2
$a automatizace $7 D001331
650    12
$a klinické alarmy $7 D056902
650    _2
$a péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu $x metody $7 D003422
650    _2
$a klinické křížové studie $7 D018592
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a nemocnice veřejné $7 D006779
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hypoxie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D000860
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    12
$a novorozenec nedonošený $7 D007234
650    _2
$a jednotky intenzivní péče o novorozence $7 D007363
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a monitorování fyziologických funkcí $7 D008991
650    _2
$a oxymetrie $7 D010092
650    _2
$a spotřeba kyslíku $x fyziologie $7 D010101
650    _2
$a oxygenoterapie $x metody $7 D010102
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a umělé dýchání $x metody $7 D012121
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
651    _2
$a Polsko $7 D011044
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Bachman, Thomas E $u Department Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Sitna 3105, 272 01, Kladno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wilinska, Maria $u Department of Neonatology, Centre of Medical Postgraduate Education, 231 Czerniakowska str, 00-416, Warsaw, Poland. wilinska.maria@gmail.com.
773    0_
$w MED00008201 $t BMC pediatrics $x 1471-2431 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2019), s. 142
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31060536 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201214131856 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1596270 $s 1114627
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 19 $c 1 $d 142 $e 20190506 $i 1471-2431 $m BMC pediatrics $n BMC Pediatr $x MED00008201
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...