• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Path integration in large-scale space and with novel geometries: Comparing vector addition and encoding-error models

SK. Harootonian, RC. Wilson, L. Hejtmánek, EM. Ziskin, AD. Ekstrom,

. 2020 ; 16 (5) : e1007489. [pub] 20200507

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025020

Path integration is thought to rely on vestibular and proprioceptive cues yet most studies in humans involve primarily visual input, providing limited insight into their respective contributions. We developed a paradigm involving walking in an omnidirectional treadmill in which participants were guided on two sides of a triangle and then found their back way to origin. In Experiment 1, we tested a range of different triangle types while keeping the distance of the unguided side constant to determine the influence of spatial geometry. Participants overshot the angle they needed to turn and undershot the distance they needed to walk, with no consistent effect of triangle type. In Experiment 2, we manipulated distance while keeping angle constant to determine how path integration operated over both shorter and longer distances. Participants underestimated the distance they needed to walk to the origin, with error increasing as a function of the walked distance. To attempt to account for our findings, we developed configural-based computational models involving vector addition, the second of which included terms for the influence of past trials on the current one. We compared against a previously developed configural model of human path integration, the Encoding-Error model. We found that the vector addition models captured the tendency of participants to under-encode guided sides of the triangles and an influence of past trials on current trials. Together, our findings expand our understanding of body-based contributions to human path integration, further suggesting the value of vector addition models in understanding these important components of human navigation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025020
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222155014.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007489 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32379824
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Harootonian, Sevan K $u Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America. Psychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
245    10
$a Path integration in large-scale space and with novel geometries: Comparing vector addition and encoding-error models / $c SK. Harootonian, RC. Wilson, L. Hejtmánek, EM. Ziskin, AD. Ekstrom,
520    9_
$a Path integration is thought to rely on vestibular and proprioceptive cues yet most studies in humans involve primarily visual input, providing limited insight into their respective contributions. We developed a paradigm involving walking in an omnidirectional treadmill in which participants were guided on two sides of a triangle and then found their back way to origin. In Experiment 1, we tested a range of different triangle types while keeping the distance of the unguided side constant to determine the influence of spatial geometry. Participants overshot the angle they needed to turn and undershot the distance they needed to walk, with no consistent effect of triangle type. In Experiment 2, we manipulated distance while keeping angle constant to determine how path integration operated over both shorter and longer distances. Participants underestimated the distance they needed to walk to the origin, with error increasing as a function of the walked distance. To attempt to account for our findings, we developed configural-based computational models involving vector addition, the second of which included terms for the influence of past trials on the current one. We compared against a previously developed configural model of human path integration, the Encoding-Error model. We found that the vector addition models captured the tendency of participants to under-encode guided sides of the triangles and an influence of past trials on current trials. Together, our findings expand our understanding of body-based contributions to human path integration, further suggesting the value of vector addition models in understanding these important components of human navigation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a výpočetní biologie $x metody $7 D019295
650    _2
$a podněty $7 D003463
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a teoretické modely $7 D008962
650    _2
$a orientace $x fyziologie $7 D009949
650    _2
$a propriocepce $x fyziologie $7 D011434
650    _2
$a vnímání prostoru $x fyziologie $7 D013028
650    _2
$a prostorová navigace $x fyziologie $7 D065854
650    _2
$a chůze $x fyziologie $7 D016138
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
700    1_
$a Wilson, Robert C $u Psychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America. Cognitive Science Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America. Evelyn McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
700    1_
$a Hejtmánek, Lukáš $u Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America. Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruská, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ziskin, Eli M $u Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America. Psychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
700    1_
$a Ekstrom, Arne D $u Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America. Psychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America. Evelyn McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
773    0_
$w MED00008919 $t PLoS computational biology $x 1553-7358 $g Roč. 16, č. 5 (2020), s. e1007489
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32379824 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222155010 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599165 $s 1115706
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 16 $c 5 $d e1007489 $e 20200507 $i 1553-7358 $m PLoS computational biology $n PLoS Comput Biol $x MED00008919
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace