• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

En bloc resection for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: review of the recent literature

K. Mori, D. D'Andrea, DV. Enikeev, S. Egawa, SF. Shariat,

. 2020 ; 30 (1) : 41-47. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20025300

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT) is the standard approach to the diagnosis and treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. However, it suffers from inherent limitations such as insufficient assessment of resection depth and the need for intravesical tumor fragmentation that hampers histopathological evaluation. We summarize recent clinical data on en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT), a method that promises to overcome these limitations. RECENT FINDINGS: The PubMed/Medline databases were searched for reports on ERBT focusing on trends in the last 2 years. ERBT provides greater resection quality, making up to 95% of detrusor muscle available for pathological evaluation. ERBT also allows detection of the muscularis mucosae thus facilitating T1 substaging. Available data demonstrate no significant difference in perioperative morbidity. No conclusions can be drawn on the impact of either modality on tumor recurrence and progression, as the available data is too underpowered. SUMMARY: ERBT is gaining acceptances as there is increasing evidence that it improves the quality of resected specimens. There seems to be no difference in perioperative morbidity between ERBT and cTURBT. The impact of ERBT on important endpoints such as recurrence and progression remains to be fully elucidated in further studies.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025300
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222155141.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000697 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31724997
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mori, Keiichiro $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
245    10
$a En bloc resection for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: review of the recent literature / $c K. Mori, D. D'Andrea, DV. Enikeev, S. Egawa, SF. Shariat,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Conventional transurethral resection of bladder tumor (cTURBT) is the standard approach to the diagnosis and treatment of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. However, it suffers from inherent limitations such as insufficient assessment of resection depth and the need for intravesical tumor fragmentation that hampers histopathological evaluation. We summarize recent clinical data on en bloc resection of bladder tumor (ERBT), a method that promises to overcome these limitations. RECENT FINDINGS: The PubMed/Medline databases were searched for reports on ERBT focusing on trends in the last 2 years. ERBT provides greater resection quality, making up to 95% of detrusor muscle available for pathological evaluation. ERBT also allows detection of the muscularis mucosae thus facilitating T1 substaging. Available data demonstrate no significant difference in perioperative morbidity. No conclusions can be drawn on the impact of either modality on tumor recurrence and progression, as the available data is too underpowered. SUMMARY: ERBT is gaining acceptances as there is increasing evidence that it improves the quality of resected specimens. There seems to be no difference in perioperative morbidity between ERBT and cTURBT. The impact of ERBT on important endpoints such as recurrence and progression remains to be fully elucidated in further studies.
650    12
$a cystektomie $7 D015653
650    _2
$a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $7 D009364
650    _2
$a nádory močového měchýře $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D001749
650    _2
$a urologické chirurgické výkony $7 D013520
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a D'Andrea, David $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
700    1_
$a Enikeev, Dmitry V $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
700    1_
$a Egawa, Shin $u Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York. Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA. Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria. Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001296 $t Current opinion in urology $x 1473-6586 $g Roč. 30, č. 1 (2020), s. 41-47
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31724997 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222155137 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599445 $s 1115986
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 30 $c 1 $d 41-47 $e - $i 1473-6586 $m Current opinion in urology $n Curr Opin Urol $x MED00001296
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace