Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

CONTINUOUS RADON-IN-WATER MONITORING-COMPARISON OF METHODS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF IN SITU MEASUREMENTS

P. Vyletělová, A. Froňka,

. 2019 ; 186 (2-3) : 406-412. [pub] 2019Dec31

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

The extraction of dissolved radon from water to gas is the most common way to measure radon concentration in water continuously. The response delay of continuous radon-in-water detection system (continuous monitor + equilibrator) is influenced by the response time of the continuous monitor and a rate of an establishment of equilibrium in the equilibrator (exchanger unit). Two types of equilibrators were used in performed experiments to compare the response time of various detection systems-RAD AQUA that uses water spraying and equilibrator with ACCUREL® PP membrane that enables radon diffusion. Each of these was connected to the continuous monitor RAD7 or RM-3. The response delay after turning on the water flow through the equilibrator was determined. The fastest detection system was RAD7 + RAD AQUA that was subsequently tested during the insitu measurement of thermal water in the healing spa and water sources near Cheb and České Budějovice.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20025343
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201222153826.0
007      
ta
008      
201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/rpd/ncz241 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31832683
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Vyletělová, Petra $u National Radiation Protection Institute, Bartoškova 28, Praha 4 140 00, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, Prague 1 115 19, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a CONTINUOUS RADON-IN-WATER MONITORING-COMPARISON OF METHODS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF IN SITU MEASUREMENTS / $c P. Vyletělová, A. Froňka,
520    9_
$a The extraction of dissolved radon from water to gas is the most common way to measure radon concentration in water continuously. The response delay of continuous radon-in-water detection system (continuous monitor + equilibrator) is influenced by the response time of the continuous monitor and a rate of an establishment of equilibrium in the equilibrator (exchanger unit). Two types of equilibrators were used in performed experiments to compare the response time of various detection systems-RAD AQUA that uses water spraying and equilibrator with ACCUREL® PP membrane that enables radon diffusion. Each of these was connected to the continuous monitor RAD7 or RM-3. The response delay after turning on the water flow through the equilibrator was determined. The fastest detection system was RAD7 + RAD AQUA that was subsequently tested during the insitu measurement of thermal water in the healing spa and water sources near Cheb and České Budějovice.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laboratoře $x normy $7 D007753
650    _2
$a monitorování radiace $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D011834
650    _2
$a radon $x analýza $7 D011886
650    _2
$a radioaktivní látky znečišťující vodu $x analýza $7 D014875
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Froňka, Aleš $u National Radiation Protection Institute, Bartoškova 28, Praha 4 140 00, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, Prague 1 115 19, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00004029 $t Radiation protection dosimetry $x 1742-3406 $g Roč. 186, č. 2-3 (2019), s. 406-412
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31832683 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20201125 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201222153823 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1599488 $s 1116029
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 186 $c 2-3 $d 406-412 $e 2019Dec31 $i 1742-3406 $m Radiation protection dosimetry $n Radiat Prot Dosimetry $x MED00004029
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20201125

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...