-
Something wrong with this record ?
CONTINUOUS RADON-IN-WATER MONITORING-COMPARISON OF METHODS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF IN SITU MEASUREMENTS
P. Vyletělová, A. Froňka,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
PubMed
31832683
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncz241
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Laboratories standards MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Radiation Monitoring instrumentation methods MeSH
- Water Pollutants, Radioactive analysis MeSH
- Radon analysis MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
The extraction of dissolved radon from water to gas is the most common way to measure radon concentration in water continuously. The response delay of continuous radon-in-water detection system (continuous monitor + equilibrator) is influenced by the response time of the continuous monitor and a rate of an establishment of equilibrium in the equilibrator (exchanger unit). Two types of equilibrators were used in performed experiments to compare the response time of various detection systems-RAD AQUA that uses water spraying and equilibrator with ACCUREL® PP membrane that enables radon diffusion. Each of these was connected to the continuous monitor RAD7 or RM-3. The response delay after turning on the water flow through the equilibrator was determined. The fastest detection system was RAD7 + RAD AQUA that was subsequently tested during the insitu measurement of thermal water in the healing spa and water sources near Cheb and České Budějovice.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025343
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222153826.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/rpd/ncz241 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31832683
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Vyletělová, Petra $u National Radiation Protection Institute, Bartoškova 28, Praha 4 140 00, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, Prague 1 115 19, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a CONTINUOUS RADON-IN-WATER MONITORING-COMPARISON OF METHODS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF IN SITU MEASUREMENTS / $c P. Vyletělová, A. Froňka,
- 520 9_
- $a The extraction of dissolved radon from water to gas is the most common way to measure radon concentration in water continuously. The response delay of continuous radon-in-water detection system (continuous monitor + equilibrator) is influenced by the response time of the continuous monitor and a rate of an establishment of equilibrium in the equilibrator (exchanger unit). Two types of equilibrators were used in performed experiments to compare the response time of various detection systems-RAD AQUA that uses water spraying and equilibrator with ACCUREL® PP membrane that enables radon diffusion. Each of these was connected to the continuous monitor RAD7 or RM-3. The response delay after turning on the water flow through the equilibrator was determined. The fastest detection system was RAD7 + RAD AQUA that was subsequently tested during the insitu measurement of thermal water in the healing spa and water sources near Cheb and České Budějovice.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a laboratoře $x normy $7 D007753
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování radiace $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D011834
- 650 _2
- $a radon $x analýza $7 D011886
- 650 _2
- $a radioaktivní látky znečišťující vodu $x analýza $7 D014875
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Froňka, Aleš $u National Radiation Protection Institute, Bartoškova 28, Praha 4 140 00, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, Prague 1 115 19, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004029 $t Radiation protection dosimetry $x 1742-3406 $g Roč. 186, č. 2-3 (2019), s. 406-412
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31832683 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222153823 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599488 $s 1116029
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 186 $c 2-3 $d 406-412 $e 2019Dec31 $i 1742-3406 $m Radiation protection dosimetry $n Radiat Prot Dosimetry $x MED00004029
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125