-
Something wrong with this record ?
Dentoalveolar Arch Dimensions in UCLP Boys After Neonatal Cheiloplasty or After Lip Surgery at the Age of 3 or 6 Months
M. Kotova, W. Urbanova, A. Sukop, R. Peterkova, M. Peterka, T. Petrova,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Maxilla MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Lip * surgery MeSH
- Cleft Palate * surgery MeSH
- Cleft Lip * surgery MeSH
- Dental Arch anatomy & histology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of 3 different time protocols of cleft lip and palate operations on the growth of the dentoalveolar arch in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 64 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys with UCLP operated on according to 3 different time protocols: lip repair at the age of 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, lip repair at 3 months and palate repair at 9 months, and neonatal lip repair and palate repair at 9 months. The control group contained 13 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys. The dentoalveolar arch width was measured between deciduous canines and between the second deciduous molars; the length was measured between incisive papilla and the line connecting both tuber maxillae. RESULTS: All measured distances were statistically significantly smaller in boys with UCLP than in the control group. Intercanine width was not statistically significantly different between the patients operated on according to the different time protocols. In comparison to the lip repair at 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, the intermolar width was statistically significantly smaller in the group with neonatal lip repair; the alveolar arch length was statistically significantly shorter in both groups with lip repair performed neonatally or at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The length of the dentoalveolar arch is shorter after surgical repair of cleft lip neonatally or at the age of 3 months. Cleft palate repair at 9 months can contribute to a reduction in the width of the dentoalveolar arch.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20025680
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20201222155342.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 201125s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/1055665618824835 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30696266
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kotova, Magdalena $u 1 Department of Stomatology, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Dentoalveolar Arch Dimensions in UCLP Boys After Neonatal Cheiloplasty or After Lip Surgery at the Age of 3 or 6 Months / $c M. Kotova, W. Urbanova, A. Sukop, R. Peterkova, M. Peterka, T. Petrova,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of 3 different time protocols of cleft lip and palate operations on the growth of the dentoalveolar arch in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 64 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys with UCLP operated on according to 3 different time protocols: lip repair at the age of 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, lip repair at 3 months and palate repair at 9 months, and neonatal lip repair and palate repair at 9 months. The control group contained 13 plaster casts of 8-year-old boys. The dentoalveolar arch width was measured between deciduous canines and between the second deciduous molars; the length was measured between incisive papilla and the line connecting both tuber maxillae. RESULTS: All measured distances were statistically significantly smaller in boys with UCLP than in the control group. Intercanine width was not statistically significantly different between the patients operated on according to the different time protocols. In comparison to the lip repair at 6 months and palate repair at 4 years, the intermolar width was statistically significantly smaller in the group with neonatal lip repair; the alveolar arch length was statistically significantly shorter in both groups with lip repair performed neonatally or at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: The length of the dentoalveolar arch is shorter after surgical repair of cleft lip neonatally or at the age of 3 months. Cleft palate repair at 9 months can contribute to a reduction in the width of the dentoalveolar arch.
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 12
- $a rozštěp rtu $x chirurgie $7 D002971
- 650 12
- $a rozštěp patra $x chirurgie $7 D002972
- 650 _2
- $a zubní oblouk $x anatomie a histologie $7 D003724
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a novorozenec $7 D007231
- 650 12
- $a ret $x chirurgie $7 D008046
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a maxila $7 D008437
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Urbanova, Wanda $u 1 Department of Stomatology, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sukop, Andrej $u 2 Clinic of Plastic Surgery, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Peterkova, Renata $u 3 Institute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Peterka, Miroslav $u 2 Clinic of Plastic Surgery, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 3 Institute of Experimental Medicine, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. 4 Institute of Anatomy, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Petrova, Tereza $u 1 Department of Stomatology, Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001099 $t The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association $x 1545-1569 $g Roč. 56, č. 8 (2019), s. 1020-1025
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30696266 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20201125 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20201222155338 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1599825 $s 1116366
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 56 $c 8 $d 1020-1025 $e 20190129 $i 1545-1569 $m The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal $n Cleft Palate Craniofac J $x MED00001099
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20201125