-
Something wrong with this record ?
How to Achieve a Healthier and More Sustainable Europe by 2040 According to the Public? Results of a Five-Country Questionnaire Survey
I. Zvěřinová, V. Máca, M. Ščasný, R. Strube, S. Marques, D. Dubová, M. Kryl, D. Craveiro, T. Taylor, A. Chiabai, S. García de Jalón,
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
PubMed Central
from 2005
Europe PubMed Central
from 2005
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2004
- MeSH
- Transportation * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Health Equity * MeSH
- Private Sector * MeSH
- Sustainable Development * MeSH
- Public Sector MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
The aim of this paper is to understand public preferences for several future scenarios of achieving a healthier, more equitable and sustainable Europe, which differ in the way the society is organized (individualistically vs. collectively) and in the driving sector (public vs. private). To achieve this aim, we conducted a questionnaire survey using representative samples for five European countries in 2018. About three thousand respondents chose among the four scenarios presented within four different contexts (green spaces, active mobility, energy-efficient housing, food consumption) or none of them. A majority of people in the five European countries were ready to accept one of the scenarios. We found significant differences in preferences according to socioeconomic backgrounds and values of respondents. People above 35 years old, those who were less educated, and those in the lowest household income tertile were less supportive of all scenarios. The heterogeneity in preferences associated with differences in socioeconomic backgrounds was larger for the scenario in which society is organized individualistically and driven by the private sector. Smaller distinctions were found in case of the scenario in which society is organized collectively and is driven by the public sector. Departing from social psychological theories, we examine the role of altruistic, biospheric, egoistic, hedonic, and security values. People with stronger biospheric values were more likely to accept scenarios, particularly those which are driven by the public sector and where there is more collective organisation. Those with a more egoistic value orientation were more likely to have higher preferences for scenarios where the private sector had a dominant role. The policy implications, in terms of the selection and framing of policy measures to enhance public support, are discussed.
Basque Centre for Climate Change Biscaya 48004 Pais Vasco Spain
Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production 42107 Wuppertal Germany
Environment Centre Charles University 162 00 Prague Czech Republic
Instituto Universitário de Lisboa CIS IUL 1649 026 Lisboa Portugal
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20027925
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210114152623.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210105s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph17176071 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32825441
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Zvěřinová, Iva $u Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a How to Achieve a Healthier and More Sustainable Europe by 2040 According to the Public? Results of a Five-Country Questionnaire Survey / $c I. Zvěřinová, V. Máca, M. Ščasný, R. Strube, S. Marques, D. Dubová, M. Kryl, D. Craveiro, T. Taylor, A. Chiabai, S. García de Jalón,
- 520 9_
- $a The aim of this paper is to understand public preferences for several future scenarios of achieving a healthier, more equitable and sustainable Europe, which differ in the way the society is organized (individualistically vs. collectively) and in the driving sector (public vs. private). To achieve this aim, we conducted a questionnaire survey using representative samples for five European countries in 2018. About three thousand respondents chose among the four scenarios presented within four different contexts (green spaces, active mobility, energy-efficient housing, food consumption) or none of them. A majority of people in the five European countries were ready to accept one of the scenarios. We found significant differences in preferences according to socioeconomic backgrounds and values of respondents. People above 35 years old, those who were less educated, and those in the lowest household income tertile were less supportive of all scenarios. The heterogeneity in preferences associated with differences in socioeconomic backgrounds was larger for the scenario in which society is organized individualistically and driven by the private sector. Smaller distinctions were found in case of the scenario in which society is organized collectively and is driven by the public sector. Departing from social psychological theories, we examine the role of altruistic, biospheric, egoistic, hedonic, and security values. People with stronger biospheric values were more likely to accept scenarios, particularly those which are driven by the public sector and where there is more collective organisation. Those with a more egoistic value orientation were more likely to have higher preferences for scenarios where the private sector had a dominant role. The policy implications, in terms of the selection and framing of policy measures to enhance public support, are discussed.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a rovnost ve zdraví $7 D000069576
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a soukromý sektor $7 D017149
- 650 _2
- $a veřejný sektor $7 D017150
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 12
- $a trvale udržitelný rozvoj $7 D000076502
- 650 12
- $a doprava $7 D014186
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Máca, Vojtěch $u Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ščasný, Milan $u Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Strube, Rosa $u Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production, 42107 Wuppertal, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Marques, Sibila $u Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Dubová, Diana $u Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kryl, Martin $u Environment Centre, Charles University, 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Craveiro, Daniela $u Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIS-IUL, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Taylor, Timothy $u European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro TR1 3HD, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Chiabai, Aline $u Basque Centre for Climate Change, Biscaya, 48004 Pais Vasco, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a García de Jalón, Silvestre $u Basque Centre for Climate Change, Biscaya, 48004 Pais Vasco, Spain.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 17, č. 17 (2020)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32825441 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210105 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210114152620 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1608260 $s 1119105
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 17 $c 17 $e 20200820 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210105