Considerations for developing and implementing a safe list for alien taxa
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38390311
PubMed Central
PMC10880065
DOI
10.1093/biosci/biad118
PII: biad118
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- biological invasions, list approaches, regulation, stakeholders, trade,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Many species have been intentionally introduced to new regions for their benefits. Some of these alien species cause damage, others do not (or at least have not yet). There are several approaches to address this problem: prohibit taxa that will cause damage, try to limit damages while preserving benefits, or promote taxa that are safe. In the present article, we unpack the safe list approach, which we define as "a list of taxa alien to the region of interest that are considered of sufficiently low risk of invasion and impact that the taxa can be widely used without concerns of negative impacts." We discuss the potential use of safe lists in the management of biological invasions; disentangle aspects related to the purpose, development, implementation, and impact of safe lists; and provide guidance for those considering to develop and implement such lists.
Centre for Agroecology Water and Resilience at Coventry University Coventry England United Kingdom
Centre for Invasion Biology in the Department of Botany and Zoology at Stellenbosch University
Centre for Sustainability Transitions at Stellenbosch University Stellenbosch South Africa
Department of Biological Sciences at the University of Toronto Scarborough Toronto Ontario Canada
Institute of Botany at the Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic
South African National Biodiversity Institute Kirstenbosch Research Centre Cape Town South Africa
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Anderson AG, Messer I, Langellotto GA. 2021. Gardeners’ perceptions of northwestern U.S. native plants are influenced by ecological information and garden group affiliation. HortTechnology 31: 458–469.
Bacher S et al. 2018. Socio-economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT). Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 159–168.
Banerjee AK, Khuroo AA, Dehnen-Schmutz K, Pant V, Patwardhan C, Ray S, Mukherjee A. 2021. An integrated policy framework and plan of action to prevent and control plant invasions in India. Environmental Science and Policy 124: 64–72.
Bayón Á, Vilà M. 2019. Horizon scanning to identify invasion risk of ornamental plants marketed in Spain. NeoBiota 52: 47–86.
Beaury EM, Patrick M, Bradley BA. 2021. Invaders for sale: The ongoing spread of invasive species by the plant trade industry. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 19: 550–556.
Blanchard R, Richardson DM, O'Farrell PJ, Von Maltitz GP. 2011. Biofuels and biodiversity in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 107: 1–8.
Botti S, Iyengar SS. 2006. The dark side of choice: When choice impairs social welfare. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 25: 24–38.
Brundu G et al. 2020. Global guidelines for the sustainable use of non-native trees to prevent tree invasions and mitigate their negative impacts. NeoBiota 61: 65–116.
Bufford JL, Daehler CC 2014. Sterility and lack of pollinator services explain reproductive failure in non-invasive ornamental plants. Diversity and Distributions 20: 975–985.
Burgiel SW, Perrault AM. 2011. Black, white, and gray lists. Pages 75–77 in Simberloff D., Rejmanek M, eds. Encyclopedia of Biological Invasions. University of California.
Burgiel SW, Foote G, Orellana M, Perrault A. 2006. Invasive Alien Species and Trade: Integrating Prevention Measures and International Trade Rules. Center for International Environmental Law and Defenders of Wildlife.
Cardoso P et al. 2021. Scientists’ warning to humanity on illegal or unsustainable wildlife trade. Biological Conservation 263: 109341.
Chucholl C, Wendler F. 2017. Positive selection of beautiful invaders: Long-term persistence and bio-invasion risk of freshwater crayfish in the pet trade. Biological Invasions 19: 197–208.
Cronin K, Kaplan H, Gaertner M, Irlich UM, Timm Hoffman M. 2017. Aliens in the nursery: Assessing the attitudes of nursery managers to invasive species regulations. Biological Invasions 19: 925–937.
Csurhes S, Randall R, Goninon C, Beilby A, Johnson S, Weiss J. 2006. “Turn the tap off before you mop up the spill”: Exploring a permitted-list approach to regulations over the sale and interstate movement of potentially invasive plants in the states and territories Australia. Pages 95–98 in Preston C, Watts JH, Crossman ND, eds. Proceedings of the 15th Australian Weeds Conference. Weed Management Society of South Australia.
Datta A, Kumschick S, Geerts S, Wilson JRU. 2020. Identifying safe cultivars of invasive plants: six questions for risk assessment, management, and communication. NeoBiota 62: 81–97.
Dehnen-Schmutz K. 2011. Determining non-invasiveness in ornamental plants to build green lists. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 1374–1380.
Dehnen-Schmutz K, Touza J, Perrings C, Williamson M. 2007. The horticultural trade and ornamental plant invasions in Britain. Conservation Biology 21: 224–231. PubMed
de Volder S, McLennan S, Schmit V. 2020. Analysis of national legislation related to the keeping and sale of exotic pets in Europe. Eurogroup for Animals (1 June 2020). www.eurogroupforanimals.org/library/analysis-national-legislation-related-keeping-and-sale-exotic-pets-europe.
Di Silvestre I, Van der Hoeven S. 2016. The implementation of the positive list for mammal pets in Belgium: A success story. Eurogroup for Animals. Report no. 20.
Drew J, Anderson N, Andow D 2010. Conundrums of a complex vector for invasive species control: A detailed examination of the horticultural industry. Biological Invasions 12: 2837–2851.
Dunn M, Marzano M, Forster J. 2020. Buying better biosecurity: Plant-buying behaviour and the implications for an accreditation scheme in the horticultural sector. Plants, People, Planet 2: 259–268.
Essl F et al. 2018. Which taxa are alien? Criteria, applications, and uncertainties. BioScience 68: 496–509.
[FAO] Food and Agricultural Organization . 2013. Pest Risk Analysis for Quarantine Pests: International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures. FAO. Report no. 11.
Faulkner KT, Robertson MP, Wilson JRU. 2020. Stronger regional biosecurity is essential to prevent hundreds of harmful biological invasions. Global Change Biology 26: 2449–2462. PubMed
Field JG, Attwood CG, Jarre A, Sink K, Atkinson LJ, Petersen S 2013. Cooperation between scientists, NGOs and industry in support of sustainable fisheries: The South African hake Merluccius spp. Trawl fishery experiences. Journal of Fish Biology 83: 1019–1034. PubMed
Fukushima CS et al. 2021. Challenges and perspectives on tackling illegal or unsustainable wildlife trade. Biological Conservation 263: 109342.
Gabellini S, Scaramuzzi S. 2022. Evolving consumption trends, marketing strategies, and governance settings in ornamental horticulture: A grey literature review. Horticulturae 8: 234.
García-de-Lomas J, Vilà M. 2015. Lists of harmful alien organisms: Are the national regulations adapted to the global world? Biological Invasions 17: 3081–3091.
Gardening Responsibly . 2021. www.gardeningresponsibly.org.au.
Geller JB. 1999. Decline of native species masked by sibling species invasion: The case of Californian marine mussels. Conservation Biology 13: 661–664.
Heywood V, Sharrock S. 2013. European Code of Conduct for Botanic Gardens on Invasive Alien Species. Botanic Gardens Conservation International.
Hulme PE. 2015. Invasion pathways at a crossroad: Policy and research challenges for managing alien species introductions. Journal of Applied Ecology 52: 1418–1424.
Hulme PE. 2017. Climate change and biological invasions: Evidence, expectations, and response options. Biological Reviews 92: 1297–1313. PubMed
Hulme PE et al. 2018. Integrating invasive species policies across ornamental horticulture supply chains to prevent plant invasions. Journal of Applied Ecology 55: 92–98.
Hulme PE. 2020. Plant invasions in New Zealand: global lessons in prevention, eradication and control. Biological Invasions 22: 1539–1562.
Humair F, Kueffer C, Siegrist M. 2014. Are non-native plants perceived to be more risky? Factors influencing horticulturists’ risk perceptions of ornamental plant species. PLOS ONE 9: e102121. PubMed PMC
Invasive Species Council . 2009. Stopping Weed Invasions: A “White List” Approach. Invasive Species Council .https://invasives.org.au/publications/stopping-weed-invasions-white-list-approach.
Isaac NJ, Mallet J, Mace GM. 2004. Taxonomic inflation: Its influence on macroecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 464–469. PubMed
[IUCN] International Union for Conservation of Nature . 2020. Guidelines for Using the IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) Categories and Criteria, vers. 1.1. IUCN.
Keller RP, Lodge DM. 2007. Species invasions from commerce in live aquatic organisms: Problems and possible solutions. BioScience 57: 428–436.
Kelly DA. 2015. Labelling and water conservation: A European perspective on a global challenge. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 36: 643–657.
Kumschick S, Richardson DM. 2013. Species-based risk assessments for biological invasions: Advances and challenges. Diversity and Distributions 19: 1095–1105.
Kumschick et al. 2024. Using the IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT) to inform decision-making. Conservation Biology 38: e14214. PubMed
Lockwood JL et al. 2019.When pets become pests: The role of the exotic pet trade in producing invasive vertebrate animals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 17: 323–330.
Maher J, Stringham OC, Moncayo S, Wood L, Lassaline CR, Virtue J, Cassey P. 2023. Weed wide web: Characterising illegal online trade of invasive plants in Australia. NeoBiota 87: 45–72.
McGeoch MA, Butchart SH, Spear D, Marais E, Kleynhans EJ, Symes A, Chanson J, Hoffmann M. 2010. Global indicators of biological invasion: Species numbers, biodiversity impact and policy responses. Diversity and Distributions 16: 95–108.
McGeoch MA, Spear D, Kleynhans EJ, Marais E. 2012. Uncertainty in invasive alien species listing. Ecological Applications 22: 959–971. PubMed
McGeoch MA, Genovesi P, Bellingham PJ, Costello MJ, McGrannachan C, Sheppard A. 2016. Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion. Biological Invasions 18: 299–314.
McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK, eds. 2001. Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. IUCN, Global Invasive Species Programme.
Mori E, Grandi G, Menchetti M, Tella JL, Jackson HA, Reino L, van Kleunen A, Figureueira R, Ancillotto L. 2017. Worldwide distribution of non-native Amazon parrots and temporal trends of their global trade. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 40: 49–62.
Nelufule T, Robertson MP, Wilson JR, Faulkner KT. 2022. Native-alien populations: An apparent oxymoron that requires specific conservation attention. NeoBiota 74: 57–74.
Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Ríos-Muñoz CA, Johnson SB, Flores-Villela OA, Arroyo-Cabrales J, Martínez-Gordillo M. 2019. Invasive species: Legislation and species list considerations from Mexico. Environmental Science and Policy 96: 59–63.
Pergl J et al. 2016. Black, grey, and watch lists of alien species in the Czech Republic based on environmental impacts and management strategy. NeoBiota 28: 1–37.
Plant Alert Team . 2021a. Gardening without Harmful Invasive Plants: A Guide to Plants You Can Use in Place of Invasive Non-Native Species. GB Non-Native Species Secretariat, Coventry University, and Aquatic Biosecurity Partnership.
Plant Alert Team . 2021b. Keeping a Pond or Aquarium without Harmful Invasive Plants: A Guide to Plants You Can Use in Place of Invasive Non-Native Species. GB Non-Native Species Secretariat, Coventry University, and Aquatic Biosecurity Partnership.
Plant Alert Team . 2021c. Landscaping without Harmful Invasive Plants: A Guide to Plants You Can Use in Place of Invasive Non-Native Species. GB Non-Native Species Secretariat, Coventry University, and Aquatic Biosecurity Partnership.
Pötzelsberger E et al. 2020. Mapping the patchy legislative landscape of non-native tree species in Europe. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research 93: 567–586.
Pyšek P et al. 2013. Hitting the right target: Taxonomic challenges for, and of, plant invasions. AoB Plants 1: 5.
Pyšek P et al. 2020. Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews 95: 1511–1534. PubMed PMC
Quinn LD, Gordon DR, Glaser A, Lieurance D, Flory SL. 2015. Bioenergy feedstocks at low risk for invasion in the USA: A “white list” approach. Bioenergy Research 2: 471–481.
Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA. 2002. A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecological Applications 12: 618–628.
Reichard SH, White P. 2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. BioScience 51:103–113.
Richardson DM, Carruthers J, Hui C, Impson FA, Miller JT, Robertson MP, Rouget M, Le Roux JJ, Wilson JR. 2011. Human-mediated introductions of Australian acacias: A global experiment in biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 17: 771–787.
Shackleton S, Paumgarten F, Kassa H, Husselman M, Zida M 2011. Opportunities for enhancing poor women's socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African non-timber forest products (NTFPs). International Forestry Review 13: 136–151.
Shackleton RT et al. 2019. Explaining people's perceptions of invasive alien species: A conceptual framework. Journal of Environmental Management 229: 10–26. PubMed
Simberloff D. 2003. How much information on population biology is needed to manage introduced species? Conservation Biology 17: 83–92.
Simberloff D. 2006. Risk assessments, blacklists, and white lists for introduced species: Are predictions good enough to be useful? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 35: 1–10.
Siriwat P, Nekaris KA, Nijman V. 2020. Digital media and the modern-day pet trade: A test of the “Harry Potter effect” and the owl trade in Thailand. Endangered Species Research 41: 7–16.
Souviron-Priego L, Muñoz AR, Olivero J, Vargas JM, Fa JE. 2018. The legal international wildlife trade favours invasive species establishment: The monk and ring-necked parakeets in Spain. Ardeola 65: 233–246.
Spafford Jacob H, Randall MR, Lloyd MS. 2004. Front Door Wide Open to Weeds: An Examination of the Weed Species Permitted for Import without Risk Assessment. World Wild Fund for Nature Australia.
Stringham OC, García-Díaz P, Toomes A, Mitchell L, Ross JV, Cassey P. 2021. Live reptile smuggling is predicted by trends in the legal exotic pet trade. Conservation Letters 14: e12833.
Tenge AJ, De Graaff J, Hella JP. 2004. Social and economic factors affecting the adoption of soil and water conservation in West Usambara highlands. Tanzania Land Degradation and Development 15: 99–114.
Toland E, Bando M, Hamers M, Cadenas V, Laidlaw R, Martínez-Silvestre A, van der Wielen P. 2020. Turning negatives into positives for pet trading and keeping: A review of positive lists. Animals 12: 2371. PubMed PMC
van Kleunen M et al. 2018. The changing role of ornamental horticulture in alien plant invasions. Biological Reviews 93: 1421–1437. PubMed
van Wilgen NJ, Wilson JR, Elith J, Wintle BA, Richardson DM 2010. Alien invaders and reptile traders: What drives the live animal trade in South Africa? Animal Conservation 13: 24–32.
van Wilgen BW, Measey J, Richardson DM, Wilson JR, Zengeya TA. 2020. Biological invasions in South Africa. Springer Nature.
Vilà M et al. 2010. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 135–144.
Volery L et al. 2020. Improving the Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT): A summary of revisions to the framework and guidelines. NeoBiota 62: 547–567.
Ward T, Phillips BF. 2008. Seafood Ecolabelling: Principles and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell.
Warwick C, Steedman C. 2021. Regulating pets using an objective positive list approach. Journal of Veterinary Behavior 42: 53–63.
Weidenhamer JD, Callaway RM. 2010. Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function. Journal of Chemical Ecology 36: 59–69. PubMed
Wilson JR, Panetta FD, Lindgren C. 2017. Detecting and Responding to Alien Plant Incursions. Cambridge University Press.
Wonham MJ, Byers JE, Grosholz ED, Leung B. 2013. Modelling the relationship between propagule pressure and invasion risk to inform policy and management. Ecological Application 23: 1691–1706. PubMed
Woodford DJ, Richardson DM, MacIsaac HJ, Mandrak N, van Wilgen BW, Wilson JR. 2016. Confronting the wicked problem of managing invasive species. NeoBiota 31: 63–86.
Young T. 2006. National and regional legislation for promotion and support to the prevention, control and eradication of invasive species. World Bank. World Bank Environment Department, Biodiversity Series, paper no. 108.