• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Cabins, castles, and constant hearts: rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation

S. Willems, C. Meyer, J. de Bono, A. Brandes, L. Eckardt, A. Elvan, I. van Gelder, A. Goette, M. Gulizia, L. Haegeli, H. Heidbuchel, KG. Haeusler, J. Kautzner, L. Mont, GA. Ng, L. Szumowski, S. Themistoclakis, K. Wegscheider, P. Kirchhof,

. 2019 ; 40 (46) : 3793-3799c. [pub] 20191207

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20028720

Grantová podpora
PG/18/33/33780 British Heart Foundation - United Kingdom
FS/13/43/30324 British Heart Foundation - United Kingdom
AA/18/2/34218 British Heart Foundation - United Kingdom
PG/17/30/32961 British Heart Foundation - United Kingdom

Recent innovations have the potential to improve rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Controlled trials provide new evidence on the effectiveness and safety of rhythm control therapy, particularly in patients with AF and heart failure. This review summarizes evidence supporting the use of rhythm control therapy in patients with AF for different outcomes, discusses implications for indications, and highlights remaining clinical gaps in evidence. Rhythm control therapy improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with symptomatic AF and can be safely delivered in elderly patients with comorbidities (mean age 70 years, 3-7% complications at 1 year). Atrial fibrillation ablation maintains sinus rhythm more effectively than antiarrhythmic drug therapy, but recurrent AF remains common, highlighting the need for better patient selection (precision medicine). Antiarrhythmic drugs remain effective after AF ablation, underpinning the synergistic mechanisms of action of AF ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs. Atrial fibrillation ablation appears to improve left ventricular function in a subset of patients with AF and heart failure. Data on the prognostic effect of rhythm control therapy are heterogeneous without a clear signal for either benefit or harm. Rhythm control therapy has acceptable safety and improves quality of life in patients with symptomatic AF, including in elderly populations with stroke risk factors. There is a clinical need to better stratify patients for rhythm control therapy. Further studies are needed to determine whether rhythm control therapy, and particularly AF ablation, improves left ventricular function and reduces AF-related complications.

AFNET Münster Germany Department of Cardiology 2 Electrophysiology University Hospital Münster Münster Germany

AFNET Münster Germany Department of Cardiology Asklepios Kliniken St Georg Hamburg Germany Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

AFNET Münster Germany DZHK partner site Hamburg Kiel Lübeck Hamburg Germany Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

AFNET Münster Germany Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust IBR 136 Wolfson Drive Birmingham UK Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust Birmingham UK

AFNET Münster Germany St Vincenz Hospital Paderborn Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine Paderborn Germany

Department of Cardiology Electrophysiology University Heart Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany DZHK partner site Hamburg Kiel Lübeck Hamburg Germany

Department of Clinical Research University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark

Department of Neurology University Hospital Würzburg Würzburg Germany

Garibaldi Nesima Hospital Catania Italy

Hospital Clinic Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust IBR 136 Wolfson Drive Birmingham UK

Isala Diagram B 5 SMO Zwolle Zwolle Netherlands

National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre University of Leicester Glenfield General Hospital Leicester UK

National Institute of Cardiology Warsaw Poland

Unit of Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Ospedale Dell'Angelo Venice Italy

Universitätsspital Zürich Zürich Switzerland Medical University Department Kantonsspital Aarau Aarau Switzerland

University Hospital Antwerp Antwerp Belgium

University of Groningen University Medical Center Groningen Groningen Netherlands

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20028720
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210304151504.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz782 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31755940
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Willems, Stephan $u AFNET, Münster, Germany. Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Kliniken St Georg, Hamburg, Germany. Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
245    10
$a Cabins, castles, and constant hearts: rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation / $c S. Willems, C. Meyer, J. de Bono, A. Brandes, L. Eckardt, A. Elvan, I. van Gelder, A. Goette, M. Gulizia, L. Haegeli, H. Heidbuchel, KG. Haeusler, J. Kautzner, L. Mont, GA. Ng, L. Szumowski, S. Themistoclakis, K. Wegscheider, P. Kirchhof,
520    9_
$a Recent innovations have the potential to improve rhythm control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Controlled trials provide new evidence on the effectiveness and safety of rhythm control therapy, particularly in patients with AF and heart failure. This review summarizes evidence supporting the use of rhythm control therapy in patients with AF for different outcomes, discusses implications for indications, and highlights remaining clinical gaps in evidence. Rhythm control therapy improves symptoms and quality of life in patients with symptomatic AF and can be safely delivered in elderly patients with comorbidities (mean age 70 years, 3-7% complications at 1 year). Atrial fibrillation ablation maintains sinus rhythm more effectively than antiarrhythmic drug therapy, but recurrent AF remains common, highlighting the need for better patient selection (precision medicine). Antiarrhythmic drugs remain effective after AF ablation, underpinning the synergistic mechanisms of action of AF ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs. Atrial fibrillation ablation appears to improve left ventricular function in a subset of patients with AF and heart failure. Data on the prognostic effect of rhythm control therapy are heterogeneous without a clear signal for either benefit or harm. Rhythm control therapy has acceptable safety and improves quality of life in patients with symptomatic AF, including in elderly populations with stroke risk factors. There is a clinical need to better stratify patients for rhythm control therapy. Further studies are needed to determine whether rhythm control therapy, and particularly AF ablation, improves left ventricular function and reduces AF-related complications.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a antiarytmika $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000889
650    _2
$a fibrilace síní $x farmakoterapie $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $7 D017115
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Meyer, Christian $u Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a de Bono, Joseph $u Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, IBR 136, Wolfson Drive, Birmingham, UK.
700    1_
$a Brandes, Axel $u Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, and Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Eckardt, Lars $u AFNET, Münster, Germany. Department of Cardiology II-Electrophysiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
700    1_
$a Elvan, Arif $u Isala Diagram B.V. SMO Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van Gelder, Isabelle $u University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Goette, Andreas $u AFNET, Münster, Germany. St. Vincenz Hospital Paderborn, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paderborn, Germany.
700    1_
$a Gulizia, Michele $u Garibaldi-Nesima Hospital, Catania, Italy.
700    1_
$a Haegeli, Laurent $u Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. Medical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Heidbüchel, Hein $u University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. $7 xx0257830
700    1_
$a Haeusler, Karl Georg $u Department of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Josef $u Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mont, Lluis $u Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Ng, G Andre $u National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Glenfield General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
700    1_
$a Szumowski, Lukasz $u National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
700    1_
$a Themistoclakis, Sakis $u Unit of Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Ospedale Dell'Angelo, Venice, Italy.
700    1_
$a Wegscheider, Karl $u AFNET, Münster, Germany. DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany. Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
700    1_
$a Kirchhof, Paulus $u AFNET, Münster, Germany. Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, IBR 136, Wolfson Drive, Birmingham, UK. Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00009622 $t European heart journal $x 1522-9645 $g Roč. 40, č. 46 (2019), s. 3793-3799c
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31755940 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210304151418 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1609055 $s 1119900
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 40 $c 46 $d 3793-3799c $e 20191207 $i 1522-9645 $m European heart journal $n Eur Heart J $x MED00009622
GRA    __
$a PG/18/33/33780 $p British Heart Foundation $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a FS/13/43/30324 $p British Heart Foundation $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a AA/18/2/34218 $p British Heart Foundation $2 United Kingdom
GRA    __
$a PG/17/30/32961 $p British Heart Foundation $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace