• Something wrong with this record ?

Cognitive Processing Impacts High Frequency Intracranial EEG Activity of Human Hippocampus in Patients With Pharmacoresistant Focal Epilepsy

J. Cimbalnik, M. Pail, P. Klimes, V. Travnicek, R. Roman, A. Vajcner, M. Brazdil,

. 2020 ; 11 (-) : 578571. [pub] 20201027

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

The electrophysiological EEG features such as high frequency oscillations, spikes and functional connectivity are often used for delineation of epileptogenic tissue and study of the normal function of the brain. The epileptogenic activity is also known to be suppressed by cognitive processing. However, differences between epileptic and healthy brain behavior during rest and task were not studied in detail. In this study we investigate the impact of cognitive processing on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic hippocampus and the intracranial EEG features representing the underlying electrophysiological processes. We investigated intracranial EEG in 24 epileptic and 24 non-epileptic hippocampi in patients with intractable focal epilepsy during a resting state period and during performance of various cognitive tasks. We evaluated the behavior of features derived from high frequency oscillations, interictal epileptiform discharges and functional connectivity and their changes in relation to cognitive processing. Subsequently, we performed an analysis whether cognitive processing can contribute to classification of epileptic and non-epileptic hippocampus using a machine learning approach. The results show that cognitive processing suppresses epileptogenic activity in epileptic hippocampus while it causes a shift toward higher frequencies in non-epileptic hippocampus. Statistical analysis reveals significantly different electrophysiological reactions of epileptic and non-epileptic hippocampus during cognitive processing, which can be measured by high frequency oscillations, interictal epileptiform discharges and functional connectivity. The calculated features showed high classification potential for epileptic hippocampus (AUC = 0.93). In conclusion, the differences between epileptic and non-epileptic hippocampus during cognitive processing bring new insight in delineation between pathological and physiological processes. Analysis of computed iEEG features in rest and task condition can improve the functional mapping during pre-surgical evaluation and provide additional guidance for distinguishing between epileptic and non-epileptic structure which is absolutely crucial for achieving the best possible outcome with as little side effects as possible.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21001890
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210126092728.0
007      
ta
008      
210105s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fneur.2020.578571 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33193030
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Cimbalnik, Jan $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia.
245    10
$a Cognitive Processing Impacts High Frequency Intracranial EEG Activity of Human Hippocampus in Patients With Pharmacoresistant Focal Epilepsy. / $c J. Cimbalnik, M. Pail, P. Klimes, V. Travnicek, R. Roman, A. Vajcner, M. Brazdil,
520    9_
$a The electrophysiological EEG features such as high frequency oscillations, spikes and functional connectivity are often used for delineation of epileptogenic tissue and study of the normal function of the brain. The epileptogenic activity is also known to be suppressed by cognitive processing. However, differences between epileptic and healthy brain behavior during rest and task were not studied in detail. In this study we investigate the impact of cognitive processing on epileptogenic and non-epileptogenic hippocampus and the intracranial EEG features representing the underlying electrophysiological processes. We investigated intracranial EEG in 24 epileptic and 24 non-epileptic hippocampi in patients with intractable focal epilepsy during a resting state period and during performance of various cognitive tasks. We evaluated the behavior of features derived from high frequency oscillations, interictal epileptiform discharges and functional connectivity and their changes in relation to cognitive processing. Subsequently, we performed an analysis whether cognitive processing can contribute to classification of epileptic and non-epileptic hippocampus using a machine learning approach. The results show that cognitive processing suppresses epileptogenic activity in epileptic hippocampus while it causes a shift toward higher frequencies in non-epileptic hippocampus. Statistical analysis reveals significantly different electrophysiological reactions of epileptic and non-epileptic hippocampus during cognitive processing, which can be measured by high frequency oscillations, interictal epileptiform discharges and functional connectivity. The calculated features showed high classification potential for epileptic hippocampus (AUC = 0.93). In conclusion, the differences between epileptic and non-epileptic hippocampus during cognitive processing bring new insight in delineation between pathological and physiological processes. Analysis of computed iEEG features in rest and task condition can improve the functional mapping during pre-surgical evaluation and provide additional guidance for distinguishing between epileptic and non-epileptic structure which is absolutely crucial for achieving the best possible outcome with as little side effects as possible.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pail, Martin $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Brno Epilepsy Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Klimes, Petr $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia. Institute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Travnicek, Vojtech $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czechia. Institute of Scientific Instruments, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Roman, Robert $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Brno Epilepsy Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Vajcner, Adam $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Brno Epilepsy Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Department of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, St. Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Brazdil, Milan $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Brno Epilepsy Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia. Behavioral and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
773    0_
$w MED00174552 $t Frontiers in neurology $x 1664-2295 $g Roč. 11, č. - (2020), s. 578571
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33193030 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20210105 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210126092724 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1614056 $s 1122174
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 11 $c - $d 578571 $e 20201027 $i 1664-2295 $m Frontiers in neurology $n Front. neurol. $x MED00174552
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210105

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...