• Something wrong with this record ?

Fractionation Analysis of Mercury in Soils: A Comparison of Three Techniques for Bioavailable Mercury Fraction Determination

P. Pelcová, A. Ridošková, J. Hrachovinová, J. Grmela

. 2020 ; 39 (9) : 1670-1677. [pub] 20200728

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
19-11528S Grantová Agentura Ceské Republiky - International

Knowledge of the fractionation of mercury in soils in the vicinity of abandoned cinnabar mines is essential for assessing the usability of soils for the cultivation of agriculturally important crops. Two different sequential extraction methods and the technique of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) were applied and compared for fractionation of mercury in soils from mercury-contaminated sites intended for farming purposes. The mercury found in these soils was primarily in the form of mercury sulfide (58.6-83.9%), followed by 6.7 to 15.4% of organically bound mercury and 2.9 to 23.2% of elemental mercury. Up to 10.3% of labile mercury species were determined by both sequential extraction methods in these soils. However, only 0.01 to 0.13% of mercury was determined as a bioavailable fraction using the DGT technique. Both sequential extraction methods tested for the fractionation analysis of mercury in contaminated soils were in excellent agreement. The content of the mobile (labile) mercury determined by the sequential extraction methods was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the content of bioavailable mercury determined by the DGT technique. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:1670-1677. © 2020 SETAC.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012186
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507102109.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/etc.4797 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32516439
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pelcová, Pavlína $u Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Fractionation Analysis of Mercury in Soils: A Comparison of Three Techniques for Bioavailable Mercury Fraction Determination / $c P. Pelcová, A. Ridošková, J. Hrachovinová, J. Grmela
520    9_
$a Knowledge of the fractionation of mercury in soils in the vicinity of abandoned cinnabar mines is essential for assessing the usability of soils for the cultivation of agriculturally important crops. Two different sequential extraction methods and the technique of diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) were applied and compared for fractionation of mercury in soils from mercury-contaminated sites intended for farming purposes. The mercury found in these soils was primarily in the form of mercury sulfide (58.6-83.9%), followed by 6.7 to 15.4% of organically bound mercury and 2.9 to 23.2% of elemental mercury. Up to 10.3% of labile mercury species were determined by both sequential extraction methods in these soils. However, only 0.01 to 0.13% of mercury was determined as a bioavailable fraction using the DGT technique. Both sequential extraction methods tested for the fractionation analysis of mercury in contaminated soils were in excellent agreement. The content of the mobile (labile) mercury determined by the sequential extraction methods was statistically significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than the content of bioavailable mercury determined by the DGT technique. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:1670-1677. © 2020 SETAC.
650    _2
$a biologická dostupnost $7 D001682
650    _2
$a chemická frakcionace $7 D005591
650    _2
$a difuze $7 D004058
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
650    _2
$a rtuť $x analýza $7 D008628
650    _2
$a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
650    _2
$a látky znečišťující půdu $x analýza $7 D012989
650    _2
$a roztoky $7 D012996
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Ridošková, Andrea $u Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hrachovinová, Jana $u Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Grmela, Jan $u Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00001560 $t Environmental toxicology and chemistry $x 1552-8618 $g Roč. 39, č. 9 (2020), s. 1670-1677
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32516439 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507102109 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1650540 $s 1132565
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 39 $c 9 $d 1670-1677 $e 20200728 $i 1552-8618 $m Environmental toxicology and chemistry $n Environ Toxicol Chem $x MED00001560
GRA    __
$a 19-11528S $p Grantová Agentura Ceské Republiky $2 International
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...