Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Peak Responses during Exercise Treadmill Testing using Individualized Ramp Protocol and Modified Bruce Protocol in Elderly Patients

S. Kozlov, M. Caprnda, O. Chernova, M. Matveeva, I. Alekseeva, K. Gazdikova, L. Gaspar, P. Kruzliak, S. Filipova, Z. Gabbasov

. 2020 ; 62 (1) : 76-81. [pub] 20200331

Language English Country Bulgaria

Document type Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Exercise capacity is well known to be an important prognostic factor in patients with cardiovascular disease and among healthy persons. AIM: To determine if there are any differences between the peak exercise response during exercise treadmill testing with the individualized ramp protocol and the modified Bruce protocol in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients (both male and female), aged 70 years and older, who had not had a baseline history of the confirmed coronary artery disease or heart failure diagnoses. All patients underwent exercise treadmill testing using modified Bruce protocol and individualized ramp protocol for 2 consecutive days. Peak heart rate, peak systolic and diastolic blood pressure, peak pressure-rate double product, exercise duration, and peak metabolic equivalents were recorded in both tests. Perceived level of exertion was evaluated using the Borg 10-point scale. RESULTS: The average duration of exercise was longer for the ramp protocol than for the modified Bruce protocol. When the modified Bruce protocol was used, patients achieved a lower workload than they did in using the ramp protocol. The rating of perceived exertion using the revised Borg scale (0 to 10) was 5.6±1.4 for the ramp protocol and 8.7±1.4 for the modified Bruce protocol, which indicates that the patients found the ramp protocol easier. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients the individualized ramp treadmill protocol allows to achieve the optimal test duration with higher degrees of workload and greater patient comfort during the test more often than does the modified Bruce protocol.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012770
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507102233.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 bu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3897/folmed.62.e49809 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32337910
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a bu
100    1_
$a Kozlov, Sergey $u Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia
245    10
$a Peak Responses during Exercise Treadmill Testing using Individualized Ramp Protocol and Modified Bruce Protocol in Elderly Patients / $c S. Kozlov, M. Caprnda, O. Chernova, M. Matveeva, I. Alekseeva, K. Gazdikova, L. Gaspar, P. Kruzliak, S. Filipova, Z. Gabbasov
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Exercise capacity is well known to be an important prognostic factor in patients with cardiovascular disease and among healthy persons. AIM: To determine if there are any differences between the peak exercise response during exercise treadmill testing with the individualized ramp protocol and the modified Bruce protocol in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 40 patients (both male and female), aged 70 years and older, who had not had a baseline history of the confirmed coronary artery disease or heart failure diagnoses. All patients underwent exercise treadmill testing using modified Bruce protocol and individualized ramp protocol for 2 consecutive days. Peak heart rate, peak systolic and diastolic blood pressure, peak pressure-rate double product, exercise duration, and peak metabolic equivalents were recorded in both tests. Perceived level of exertion was evaluated using the Borg 10-point scale. RESULTS: The average duration of exercise was longer for the ramp protocol than for the modified Bruce protocol. When the modified Bruce protocol was used, patients achieved a lower workload than they did in using the ramp protocol. The rating of perceived exertion using the revised Borg scale (0 to 10) was 5.6±1.4 for the ramp protocol and 8.7±1.4 for the modified Bruce protocol, which indicates that the patients found the ramp protocol easier. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients the individualized ramp treadmill protocol allows to achieve the optimal test duration with higher degrees of workload and greater patient comfort during the test more often than does the modified Bruce protocol.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a krevní tlak $7 D001794
650    _2
$a zátěžový test $x metody $7 D005080
650    12
$a tolerance zátěže $7 D017079
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a srdeční frekvence $7 D006339
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a metabolický ekvivalent $7 D055686
650    12
$a spotřeba kyslíku $7 D010101
650    _2
$a tělesná námaha $7 D005082
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Caprnda, Martin $u Comenius University and University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Chernova, Olga $u Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia
700    1_
$a Matveeva, Marina $u Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia
700    1_
$a Alekseeva, Irina $u Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia
700    1_
$a Gazdikova, Katarina $u Comenius University and University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Gaspar, Ludovit $u Comenius University and University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Kruzliak, Peter $u University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Filipova, Slavomira $u Comenius University and University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Gabbasov, Zufar $u Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia
773    0_
$w MED00001815 $t Folia medica $x 1314-2143 $g Roč. 62, č. 1 (2020), s. 76-81
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32337910 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507102233 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1651017 $s 1133149
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 62 $c 1 $d 76-81 $e 20200331 $i 1314-2143 $m Folia medica $n Folia Med (Plovdiv) $x MED00001815
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...