• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Bacterial and Eukaryotic Small-Subunit Amplicon Data Do Not Provide a Quantitative Picture of Microbial Communities, but They Are Reliable in the Context of Ecological Interpretations

K. Piwosz, T. Shabarova, J. Pernthaler, T. Posch, K. Šimek, P. Porcal, MM. Salcher

. 2020 ; 5 (2) : . [pub] 20200304

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21012810

High-throughput sequencing (HTS) of gene amplicons is a preferred method of assessing microbial community composition, because it rapidly provides information from a large number of samples at high taxonomic resolution and low costs. However, mock community studies show that HTS data poorly reflect the actual relative abundances of individual phylotypes, casting doubt on the reliability of subsequent statistical analysis and data interpretation. We investigated how accurately HTS data reflect the variability of bacterial and eukaryotic community composition and their relationship with environmental factors in natural samples. For this, we compared results of HTS from three independent aquatic time series (n = 883) with those from an established, quantitative microscopic method (catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization [CARD-FISH]). Relative abundances obtained by CARD-FISH and HTS disagreed for most bacterial and eukaryotic phylotypes. Nevertheless, the two methods identified the same environmental drivers to shape bacterial and eukaryotic communities. Our results show that amplicon data do provide reliable information for their ecological interpretations. Yet, when studying specific phylogenetic groups, it is advisable to combine HTS with quantification using microscopy and/or the addition of internal standards.IMPORTANCE High-throughput sequencing (HTS) of amplified fragments of rRNA genes provides unprecedented insight into the diversity of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Unfortunately, HTS data are prone to quantitative biases, which may lead to an erroneous picture of microbial community composition and thwart efforts to advance its understanding. These concerns motivated us to investigate how accurately HTS data characterize the variability of microbial communities, the relative abundances of specific phylotypes, and their relationships with environmental factors in comparison to an established microscopy-based method. We compared results obtained by HTS and catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) from three independent aquatic time series for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms (almost 900 data points, the largest obtained with both methods so far). HTS and CARD-FISH data disagree with regard to relative abundances of bacterial and eukaryotic phylotypes but identify similar environmental drivers shaping bacterial and eukaryotic communities.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012810
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507103726.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1128/mSphere.00052-20 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32132159
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Piwosz, Kasia $u Centre Algatech, Institute of Microbiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Třeboň, Czech Republic kpiwosz@mir.gdynia.pl $u Department of Fisheries Oceanography and Marine Ecology, National Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Gdynia, Poland
245    10
$a Bacterial and Eukaryotic Small-Subunit Amplicon Data Do Not Provide a Quantitative Picture of Microbial Communities, but They Are Reliable in the Context of Ecological Interpretations / $c K. Piwosz, T. Shabarova, J. Pernthaler, T. Posch, K. Šimek, P. Porcal, MM. Salcher
520    9_
$a High-throughput sequencing (HTS) of gene amplicons is a preferred method of assessing microbial community composition, because it rapidly provides information from a large number of samples at high taxonomic resolution and low costs. However, mock community studies show that HTS data poorly reflect the actual relative abundances of individual phylotypes, casting doubt on the reliability of subsequent statistical analysis and data interpretation. We investigated how accurately HTS data reflect the variability of bacterial and eukaryotic community composition and their relationship with environmental factors in natural samples. For this, we compared results of HTS from three independent aquatic time series (n = 883) with those from an established, quantitative microscopic method (catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization [CARD-FISH]). Relative abundances obtained by CARD-FISH and HTS disagreed for most bacterial and eukaryotic phylotypes. Nevertheless, the two methods identified the same environmental drivers to shape bacterial and eukaryotic communities. Our results show that amplicon data do provide reliable information for their ecological interpretations. Yet, when studying specific phylogenetic groups, it is advisable to combine HTS with quantification using microscopy and/or the addition of internal standards.IMPORTANCE High-throughput sequencing (HTS) of amplified fragments of rRNA genes provides unprecedented insight into the diversity of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Unfortunately, HTS data are prone to quantitative biases, which may lead to an erroneous picture of microbial community composition and thwart efforts to advance its understanding. These concerns motivated us to investigate how accurately HTS data characterize the variability of microbial communities, the relative abundances of specific phylotypes, and their relationships with environmental factors in comparison to an established microscopy-based method. We compared results obtained by HTS and catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) from three independent aquatic time series for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms (almost 900 data points, the largest obtained with both methods so far). HTS and CARD-FISH data disagree with regard to relative abundances of bacterial and eukaryotic phylotypes but identify similar environmental drivers shaping bacterial and eukaryotic communities.
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $7 D001419
650    _2
$a Eukaryota $x klasifikace $7 D056890
650    12
$a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $7 D059014
650    12
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a fluorescenční mikroskopie $7 D008856
650    _2
$a statistické modely $7 D015233
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a mořská voda $x mikrobiologie $7 D012623
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Shabarova, Tanja $u Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pernthaler, Jakob $u Limnological Station, Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Kilchberg, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Posch, Thomas $u Limnological Station, Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Kilchberg, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Šimek, Karel $u Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Porcal, Petr $u Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Salcher, Michaela M $u Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences, České Budějovice, Czech Republic $u Limnological Station, Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, Kilchberg, Switzerland
773    0_
$w MED00190572 $t mSphere $x 2379-5042 $g Roč. 5, č. 2 (2020)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32132159 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507103725 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1651055 $s 1133189
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 5 $c 2 $e 20200304 $i 2379-5042 $m mSphere $n mSphere $x MED00190572
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...