• Something wrong with this record ?

Radiological markers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Relative comparison of their diagnostic performance

P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Malm, J. Salzer, J. Zizka

. 2020 ; 408 (-) : 116581. [pub] 20191118

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21012921

PURPOSE: Numerous radiological measures have been proposed as imaging biomarkers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), however, the number of studies systematically comparing their diagnostic values remains limited. The study objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of fifteen cross-sectional imaging iNPH biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty subjects were prospectively enrolled in the study: 35 subjects with clinically confirmed iNPH and 45 matched healthy controls (HC). Values of linear, angular and index measurements including three newly proposed biomarkers were obtained from 3T brain MRI studies by two independent readers. Diagnostic performance of biomarkers was studied by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and t-statistic. RESULTS: All biomarkers studied were able to reliably differentiate iNPH subjects from HC (p < .001) except for cella media-to-temporal horn ratio. Z-Evans index, vertical cella media and vertical frontal horn diameters showed the highest discriminatory power between iNPH and HC groups (area under curve >0.99). Simple linear measurements of vertical (0.99) or horizontal (0.95) frontal horn diameters showed results comparable to calculated ratios, i.e. z-Evans (0.99) and Evans (0.96) indexes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The best diagnostic performance among fifteen radiological iNPH biomarkers was found in linear measurements referring to caudocranial alterations of the ventricular geometry, outweighing those referring to laterolateral ventricular enlargement (as e.g. commonly used Evans index). Simple linear measurements of vertical or horizontal frontal horn diameters showed comparable results to calculated, more time-consuming z-Evans or Evans indexes, respectively.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21012921
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210507103346.0
007      
ta
008      
210420s2020 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116581 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31760225
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Ryska, Pavel $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Radiological markers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Relative comparison of their diagnostic performance / $c P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Malm, J. Salzer, J. Zizka
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Numerous radiological measures have been proposed as imaging biomarkers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), however, the number of studies systematically comparing their diagnostic values remains limited. The study objective was to compare the diagnostic performance of fifteen cross-sectional imaging iNPH biomarkers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty subjects were prospectively enrolled in the study: 35 subjects with clinically confirmed iNPH and 45 matched healthy controls (HC). Values of linear, angular and index measurements including three newly proposed biomarkers were obtained from 3T brain MRI studies by two independent readers. Diagnostic performance of biomarkers was studied by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and t-statistic. RESULTS: All biomarkers studied were able to reliably differentiate iNPH subjects from HC (p < .001) except for cella media-to-temporal horn ratio. Z-Evans index, vertical cella media and vertical frontal horn diameters showed the highest discriminatory power between iNPH and HC groups (area under curve >0.99). Simple linear measurements of vertical (0.99) or horizontal (0.95) frontal horn diameters showed results comparable to calculated ratios, i.e. z-Evans (0.99) and Evans (0.96) indexes, respectively. CONCLUSION: The best diagnostic performance among fifteen radiological iNPH biomarkers was found in linear measurements referring to caudocranial alterations of the ventricular geometry, outweighing those referring to laterolateral ventricular enlargement (as e.g. commonly used Evans index). Simple linear measurements of vertical or horizontal frontal horn diameters showed comparable results to calculated, more time-consuming z-Evans or Evans indexes, respectively.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a normotenzní hydrocefalus $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D006850
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $x normy $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Slezak, Ondrej $u Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Eklund, Anders $u Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden
700    1_
$a Malm, Jan $u Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Neurology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden
700    1_
$a Salzer, Jonatan $u Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Neurology, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden
700    1_
$a Zizka, Jan $u Department of Imaging and Functional Medicine, University Hospital of Umeå, Daniel Naezéns väg, 90737 Umeå, Sweden. Electronic address: jan.zizka@regionvasterbotten.se
773    0_
$w MED00003004 $t Journal of the neurological sciences $x 1878-5883 $g Roč. 408, č. - (2020), s. 116581
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31760225 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210507103345 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1651154 $s 1133300
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 408 $c - $d 116581 $e 20191118 $i 1878-5883 $m Journal of the neurological sciences $n J Neurol Sci $x MED00003004
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210420

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options