• Something wrong with this record ?

Dissociation, Cognitive Reflection and Health Literacy Have a Modest Effect on Belief in Conspiracy Theories about COVID-19

V. Pisl, J. Volavka, E. Chvojkova, K. Cechova, G. Kavalirova, J. Vevera

. 2021 ; 18 (10) : . [pub] 20210511

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
program nr 9, by the program Progres = C4 = 8D. Q 06/LF1 = 20 Univerzita Karlova v Praze

Understanding the predictors of belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories and willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19 may aid the resolution of current and future pandemics. We investigate how psychological and cognitive characteristics influence general conspiracy mentality and COVID-related conspiracy theories. A cross-sectional study was conducted based on data from an online survey of a sample of Czech university students (n = 866) collected in January 2021, using multivariate linear regression and mediation analysis. Sixteen percent of respondents believed that COVID-19 is a hoax, and 17% believed that COVID-19 was intentionally created by humans. Seven percent of the variance of the hoax theory and 10% of the variance of the creation theory was explained by (in descending order of relevance) low cognitive reflection, low digital health literacy, high experience with dissociation and, to some extent, high bullshit receptivity. Belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories depended less on psychological and cognitive variables compared to conspiracy mentality (16% of the variance explained). The effect of digital health literacy on belief in COVID-related theories was moderated by cognitive reflection. Belief in conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 was influenced by experience with dissociation, cognitive reflection, digital health literacy and bullshit receptivity.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018617
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100221.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/ijerph18105065 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34065023
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Pisl, Vojtech $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, 30100 Pilsen, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Dissociation, Cognitive Reflection and Health Literacy Have a Modest Effect on Belief in Conspiracy Theories about COVID-19 / $c V. Pisl, J. Volavka, E. Chvojkova, K. Cechova, G. Kavalirova, J. Vevera
520    9_
$a Understanding the predictors of belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories and willingness to get vaccinated against COVID-19 may aid the resolution of current and future pandemics. We investigate how psychological and cognitive characteristics influence general conspiracy mentality and COVID-related conspiracy theories. A cross-sectional study was conducted based on data from an online survey of a sample of Czech university students (n = 866) collected in January 2021, using multivariate linear regression and mediation analysis. Sixteen percent of respondents believed that COVID-19 is a hoax, and 17% believed that COVID-19 was intentionally created by humans. Seven percent of the variance of the hoax theory and 10% of the variance of the creation theory was explained by (in descending order of relevance) low cognitive reflection, low digital health literacy, high experience with dissociation and, to some extent, high bullshit receptivity. Belief in COVID-related conspiracy theories depended less on psychological and cognitive variables compared to conspiracy mentality (16% of the variance explained). The effect of digital health literacy on belief in COVID-related theories was moderated by cognitive reflection. Belief in conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 was influenced by experience with dissociation, cognitive reflection, digital health literacy and bullshit receptivity.
650    12
$a COVID-19 $7 D000086382
650    _2
$a kognice $7 D003071
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a disociační poruchy $7 D004213
650    12
$a zdravotní gramotnost $7 D057220
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a SARS-CoV-2 $7 D000086402
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Volavka, Jan $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, 30100 Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
700    1_
$a Chvojkova, Edita $u Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, 1012 Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Cechova, Katerina $u Memory Clinic, Department of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic $u International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kavalirova, Gabriela $u Center of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, University of West Bohemia, 30100 Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vevera, Jan $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, 30100 Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Psychiatry, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic $u Institute for Postgraduate Medical Education, 10005 Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 18, č. 10 (2021)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34065023 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100221 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689649 $s 1139063
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 18 $c 10 $e 20210511 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
GRA    __
$a program nr 9, by the program Progres = C4 = 8D. Q 06/LF1 = 20 $p Univerzita Karlova v Praze
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...