-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study)
D. Gagyor, V. Kalis, M. Smazinka, Z. Rusavy, R. Pilka, KM. Ismail
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
Progres Q39
Lékařská Fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova
LO1503
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787
Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2001
PubMed Central
from 2001
Europe PubMed Central
from 2001
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-06-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- Gynecologic Surgical Procedures MeSH
- Hysterectomy MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Laparoscopy * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse * surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Uterus MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Abdominal and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (LSC) is considered the standard surgical option for the management of a symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Women who have their uterus, and for whom an LSC is indicated, can have a laparoscopic sacro-hysteropexy (LSH), a laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy (LSCH + LSC) or a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (TLH + LSC). The main aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient reported outcomes of uterine sparing versus concomitant hysterectomy LSC procedures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinical, imaging and patient reported outcomes at baseline, 3 and 12 months after LSH versus either LSCH + LSC or TLH + LSC between January 2015 and January 2019 in a tertiary referral urogynecology center in Pilsen, the Czech Republic. RESULTS: In total, 294 women were included in this analysis (LSH n = 43, LSCH + LSC n = 208 and TLH + LSC n = 43). There were no differences in the incidence of perioperative injuries and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the concomitant hysterectomy and the uterine sparing groups in any of the operative, clinical or patient reported outcomes except for a significantly lower anterior compartment failure rate (p = 0.017) and higher optimal mesh placement rate at 12 months in women who had concomitant hysterectomy procedures (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: LSH seems to be associated with higher incidence of anterior compartment failures and suboptimal mesh placement based on postoperative imaging techniques compared to LSC with concomitant hysterectomy.
Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University Hospital Pilsen Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019224
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830100806.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12905-021-01208-5 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33596878
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Gagyor, Daniel $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and Faculty Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study) / $c D. Gagyor, V. Kalis, M. Smazinka, Z. Rusavy, R. Pilka, KM. Ismail
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Abdominal and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (LSC) is considered the standard surgical option for the management of a symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Women who have their uterus, and for whom an LSC is indicated, can have a laparoscopic sacro-hysteropexy (LSH), a laparoscopic supra-cervical hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy (LSCH + LSC) or a total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic sacro-colpopexy (TLH + LSC). The main aim of this study was to compare clinical and patient reported outcomes of uterine sparing versus concomitant hysterectomy LSC procedures. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinical, imaging and patient reported outcomes at baseline, 3 and 12 months after LSH versus either LSCH + LSC or TLH + LSC between January 2015 and January 2019 in a tertiary referral urogynecology center in Pilsen, the Czech Republic. RESULTS: In total, 294 women were included in this analysis (LSH n = 43, LSCH + LSC n = 208 and TLH + LSC n = 43). There were no differences in the incidence of perioperative injuries and complications. There were no statistically significant differences between the concomitant hysterectomy and the uterine sparing groups in any of the operative, clinical or patient reported outcomes except for a significantly lower anterior compartment failure rate (p = 0.017) and higher optimal mesh placement rate at 12 months in women who had concomitant hysterectomy procedures (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: LSH seems to be associated with higher incidence of anterior compartment failures and suboptimal mesh placement based on postoperative imaging techniques compared to LSC with concomitant hysterectomy.
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a gynekologické chirurgické výkony $7 D013509
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hysterektomie $7 D007044
- 650 12
- $a laparoskopie $7 D010535
- 650 12
- $a prolaps pánevních orgánů $x chirurgie $7 D056887
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a uterus $7 D014599
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kalis, Vladimir $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Smazinka, Martin $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rusavy, Zdenek $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pilka, Radovan $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University and Faculty Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ismail, Khaled M $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. khaled.ismail@lfp.cuni.cz $u Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic. khaled.ismail@lfp.cuni.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008209 $t BMC women's health $x 1472-6874 $g Roč. 21, č. 1 (2021), s. 72
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33596878 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830100806 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690121 $s 1139670
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 21 $c 1 $d 72 $e 20210217 $i 1472-6874 $m BMC women's health $n BMC Womens Health $x MED00008209
- GRA __
- $a Progres Q39 $p Lékařská Fakulta v Plzni, Univerzita Karlova
- GRA __
- $a LO1503 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
- GRA __
- $a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000787 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728
