Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Is health-related quality of life of patients after single-use flexible ureteroscopy superior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A randomised prospective study

J. Svihra, I. Sopilko, V. Svihrova, V. Student, J. Luptak

. 2021 ; 49 (1) : 73-79. [pub] 20201109

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21019390

The aims of the study were to compare the change in the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) score in patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) single-use ureteroscope or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with a calculation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). 158 patients treated with urinary stone disease were randomly divided into 80 patients in the validation and 78 patients in the intervention arm. Patients in the intervention arm were randomly divided into the RIRS or the ESWL group. Linguistic validation of the WISQOL into the Slovak language was performed using a standardised multistep process. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing stone-forming patients to an additional 34 healthy individuals. Patients were asked to fill in the WISQOL before and in the 24th week after the intervention. The QALYs were calculated by the formula QALY = weight factor (WF) x time period after intervention. The Cronbach's α of the WISQOL was 0.94, the Pearson's coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.91, and the discriminant validity confirmed a higher score for healthy individuals (p < 0.001). The median WISQOL score changed from 45.5 to 95.5 vs. 33.9 to 87.1 in the RIRS and ESWL groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients from the RIRS group had a good possibility of reaching 19.727 QALYs gained during life expectancy compared to 15.780 for the ESWL group (p < 0.001). RIRS single-use ureteroscope is significantly superior to ESWL in reaching more QALYs gained during life expectancy. The WISQOL Slovak version is valid, reliable and strictly specific for stone-forming patients.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21019390
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100941.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00240-020-01224-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33164114
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Svihra, Jan $u Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Martin, Kollarova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia $u Urology Clinic of the Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 775 15, Olomouc, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Is health-related quality of life of patients after single-use flexible ureteroscopy superior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A randomised prospective study / $c J. Svihra, I. Sopilko, V. Svihrova, V. Student, J. Luptak
520    9_
$a The aims of the study were to compare the change in the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) score in patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) single-use ureteroscope or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with a calculation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). 158 patients treated with urinary stone disease were randomly divided into 80 patients in the validation and 78 patients in the intervention arm. Patients in the intervention arm were randomly divided into the RIRS or the ESWL group. Linguistic validation of the WISQOL into the Slovak language was performed using a standardised multistep process. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing stone-forming patients to an additional 34 healthy individuals. Patients were asked to fill in the WISQOL before and in the 24th week after the intervention. The QALYs were calculated by the formula QALY = weight factor (WF) x time period after intervention. The Cronbach's α of the WISQOL was 0.94, the Pearson's coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.91, and the discriminant validity confirmed a higher score for healthy individuals (p < 0.001). The median WISQOL score changed from 45.5 to 95.5 vs. 33.9 to 87.1 in the RIRS and ESWL groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients from the RIRS group had a good possibility of reaching 19.727 QALYs gained during life expectancy compared to 15.780 for the ESWL group (p < 0.001). RIRS single-use ureteroscope is significantly superior to ESWL in reaching more QALYs gained during life expectancy. The WISQOL Slovak version is valid, reliable and strictly specific for stone-forming patients.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a litotripse $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008096
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a psychometrie $x metody $7 D011594
650    12
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    _2
$a kvalitativně upravené roky života $7 D019057
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011795
650    _2
$a překládání $7 D014175
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a ureteroskopy $7 D020709
650    _2
$a ureteroskopie $x přístrojové vybavení $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D018666
650    _2
$a močové kameny $x komplikace $x psychologie $x chirurgie $7 D014545
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Sopilko, Igor $u Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Martin, Kollarova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia
700    1_
$a Svihrova, Viera $u Department of Public Health, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, Mala Hora 11149/4B, 036 01, Martin, Slovakia. viera.svihrova@uniba.sk
700    1_
$a Student, Vladimir $u Urology Clinic of the Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 775 15, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Luptak, Jan $u Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Martin, Kollarova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia $u Clinic of Urology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, Mala Hora 4A, 036 01, Martin, Slovakia
773    0_
$w MED00185814 $t Urolithiasis $x 2194-7236 $g Roč. 49, č. 1 (2021), s. 73-79
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33164114 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100941 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690254 $s 1139836
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 49 $c 1 $d 73-79 $e 20201109 $i 2194-7236 $m Urolithiasis $n Urolithiasis $x MED00185814
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...