-
Something wrong with this record ?
Is health-related quality of life of patients after single-use flexible ureteroscopy superior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A randomised prospective study
J. Svihra, I. Sopilko, V. Svihrova, V. Student, J. Luptak
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Validation Study
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2013-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Quality of Life * MeSH
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lithotripsy statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Urinary Calculi complications psychology surgery MeSH
- Translating MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Psychometrics methods MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Ureteroscopy instrumentation statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Ureteroscopes MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Validation Study MeSH
The aims of the study were to compare the change in the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) score in patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) single-use ureteroscope or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with a calculation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). 158 patients treated with urinary stone disease were randomly divided into 80 patients in the validation and 78 patients in the intervention arm. Patients in the intervention arm were randomly divided into the RIRS or the ESWL group. Linguistic validation of the WISQOL into the Slovak language was performed using a standardised multistep process. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing stone-forming patients to an additional 34 healthy individuals. Patients were asked to fill in the WISQOL before and in the 24th week after the intervention. The QALYs were calculated by the formula QALY = weight factor (WF) x time period after intervention. The Cronbach's α of the WISQOL was 0.94, the Pearson's coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.91, and the discriminant validity confirmed a higher score for healthy individuals (p < 0.001). The median WISQOL score changed from 45.5 to 95.5 vs. 33.9 to 87.1 in the RIRS and ESWL groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients from the RIRS group had a good possibility of reaching 19.727 QALYs gained during life expectancy compared to 15.780 for the ESWL group (p < 0.001). RIRS single-use ureteroscope is significantly superior to ESWL in reaching more QALYs gained during life expectancy. The WISQOL Slovak version is valid, reliable and strictly specific for stone-forming patients.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019390
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830100941.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00240-020-01224-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33164114
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Svihra, Jan $u Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Martin, Kollarova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia $u Urology Clinic of the Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 775 15, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Is health-related quality of life of patients after single-use flexible ureteroscopy superior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A randomised prospective study / $c J. Svihra, I. Sopilko, V. Svihrova, V. Student, J. Luptak
- 520 9_
- $a The aims of the study were to compare the change in the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WISQOL) score in patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) single-use ureteroscope or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with a calculation of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). 158 patients treated with urinary stone disease were randomly divided into 80 patients in the validation and 78 patients in the intervention arm. Patients in the intervention arm were randomly divided into the RIRS or the ESWL group. Linguistic validation of the WISQOL into the Slovak language was performed using a standardised multistep process. Discriminant validity was assessed by comparing stone-forming patients to an additional 34 healthy individuals. Patients were asked to fill in the WISQOL before and in the 24th week after the intervention. The QALYs were calculated by the formula QALY = weight factor (WF) x time period after intervention. The Cronbach's α of the WISQOL was 0.94, the Pearson's coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.91, and the discriminant validity confirmed a higher score for healthy individuals (p < 0.001). The median WISQOL score changed from 45.5 to 95.5 vs. 33.9 to 87.1 in the RIRS and ESWL groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients from the RIRS group had a good possibility of reaching 19.727 QALYs gained during life expectancy compared to 15.780 for the ESWL group (p < 0.001). RIRS single-use ureteroscope is significantly superior to ESWL in reaching more QALYs gained during life expectancy. The WISQOL Slovak version is valid, reliable and strictly specific for stone-forming patients.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a litotripse $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008096
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $x metody $7 D011594
- 650 12
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a kvalitativně upravené roky života $7 D019057
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a překládání $7 D014175
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a ureteroskopy $7 D020709
- 650 _2
- $a ureteroskopie $x přístrojové vybavení $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D018666
- 650 _2
- $a močové kameny $x komplikace $x psychologie $x chirurgie $7 D014545
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a validační studie $7 D023361
- 700 1_
- $a Sopilko, Igor $u Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Martin, Kollarova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia
- 700 1_
- $a Svihrova, Viera $u Department of Public Health, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, Mala Hora 11149/4B, 036 01, Martin, Slovakia. viera.svihrova@uniba.sk
- 700 1_
- $a Student, Vladimir $u Urology Clinic of the Faculty Hospital Olomouc, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Hněvotínská 3, 775 15, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Luptak, Jan $u Clinic of Urology, University Hospital Martin, Kollarova 2, 036 59, Martin, Slovakia $u Clinic of Urology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University Bratislava, Mala Hora 4A, 036 01, Martin, Slovakia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00185814 $t Urolithiasis $x 2194-7236 $g Roč. 49, č. 1 (2021), s. 73-79
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33164114 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830100941 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690254 $s 1139836
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 49 $c 1 $d 73-79 $e 20201109 $i 2194-7236 $m Urolithiasis $n Urolithiasis $x MED00185814
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728