Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Turning preference in dogs: North attracts while south repels

J. Adámková, K. Benediktová, J. Svoboda, L. Bartoš, L. Vynikalová, P. Nováková, V. Hart, MS. Painter, H. Burda

. 2021 ; 16 (1) : e0245940. [pub] 20210128

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

It was shown earlier that dogs, when selecting between two dishes with snacks placed in front of them, left and right, prefer to turn either clockwise or counterclockwise or randomly in either direction. This preference (or non-preference) is individually consistent in all trials but it is biased in favor of north if they choose between dishes positioned north and east or north and west, a phenomenon denoted as "pull of the north". Here, we replicated these experiments indoors, in magnetic coils, under natural magnetic field and under magnetic field shifted 90° clockwise. We demonstrate that "pull of the north" was present also in an environment without any outdoor cues and that the magnetic (and not topographic) north exerted the effect. The detailed analysis shows that the phenomenon involves also "repulsion of the south". The clockwise turning preference in the right-preferring dogs is more pronounced in the S-W combination, while the counterclockwise turning preference in the left-preferring dogs is pronounced in the S-E combination. In this way, south-placed dishes are less frequently chosen than would be expected, while the north-placed dishes are apparently more preferred. Turning preference did not correlate with the motoric paw laterality (Kong test). Given that the choice of a dish is visually guided, we postulate that the turning preference was determined by the dominant eye, so that a dominant right eye resulted in clockwise, and a dominant left eye in counterclockwise turning. Assuming further that magnetoreception in canines is based on the radical-pair mechanism, a "conflict of interests" may be expected, if the dominant eye guides turning away from north, yet the contralateral eye "sees the north", which generally acts attractive, provoking body alignment along the north-south axis.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21019399
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100947.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0245940 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33507979
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Adámková, Jana $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Turning preference in dogs: North attracts while south repels / $c J. Adámková, K. Benediktová, J. Svoboda, L. Bartoš, L. Vynikalová, P. Nováková, V. Hart, MS. Painter, H. Burda
520    9_
$a It was shown earlier that dogs, when selecting between two dishes with snacks placed in front of them, left and right, prefer to turn either clockwise or counterclockwise or randomly in either direction. This preference (or non-preference) is individually consistent in all trials but it is biased in favor of north if they choose between dishes positioned north and east or north and west, a phenomenon denoted as "pull of the north". Here, we replicated these experiments indoors, in magnetic coils, under natural magnetic field and under magnetic field shifted 90° clockwise. We demonstrate that "pull of the north" was present also in an environment without any outdoor cues and that the magnetic (and not topographic) north exerted the effect. The detailed analysis shows that the phenomenon involves also "repulsion of the south". The clockwise turning preference in the right-preferring dogs is more pronounced in the S-W combination, while the counterclockwise turning preference in the left-preferring dogs is pronounced in the S-E combination. In this way, south-placed dishes are less frequently chosen than would be expected, while the north-placed dishes are apparently more preferred. Turning preference did not correlate with the motoric paw laterality (Kong test). Given that the choice of a dish is visually guided, we postulate that the turning preference was determined by the dominant eye, so that a dominant right eye resulted in clockwise, and a dominant left eye in counterclockwise turning. Assuming further that magnetoreception in canines is based on the radical-pair mechanism, a "conflict of interests" may be expected, if the dominant eye guides turning away from north, yet the contralateral eye "sees the north", which generally acts attractive, provoking body alignment along the north-south axis.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a chování zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D001522
650    12
$a podněty $7 D003463
650    _2
$a psi $7 D004285
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a magnetické pole $7 D060526
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a změna polohy v prostoru $x fyziologie $7 D000072458
650    _2
$a prostorové chování $x fyziologie $7 D013037
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Benediktová, Kateřina $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Jan $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bartoš, Luděk $u Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science, Praha, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vynikalová, Lucie $u Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Nováková, Petra $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hart, Vlastimil $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Painter, Michael S $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Burda, Hynek $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 16, č. 1 (2021), s. e0245940
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33507979 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100947 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690262 $s 1139845
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 16 $c 1 $d e0245940 $e 20210128 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...