-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The Role of Cell Blocks and Immunohistochemistry in Thyroid Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Bethesda Category
M. Abram, R. Huhtamella, D. Kalfert, H. Hakso-Mäkinen, M. Ludvíková, I. Kholová
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
33789274
DOI
10.1159/000514906
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- fixace tkání MeSH
- galektiny analýza MeSH
- imunohistochemie * MeSH
- keratin-19 analýza MeSH
- krevní proteiny analýza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery analýza MeSH
- nádory štítné žlázy chemie patologie MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- studie proveditelnosti MeSH
- stupeň nádoru MeSH
- zalévání tkání do parafínu * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Thyroid cytology is a widely accepted tool in the clinical triaging of nodular lesions. Cell blocks (CBs) can help in the diagnosis of atypical lesions, namely, thyroid Bethesda category of Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). METHODS: In a series of 224 AUS/FLUS thyroid samples with CB, we studied CB cellularity and feasibility of 3 immunohistochemical markers (cytokeratin 19 [CK19], HBME-1, and galectin-3) apart and in combination. RESULTS: The CBs were non-diagnostic in 34 cases. Twenty-four CBs contained <10 cells, 45 CBs 10-50 cells, and 121 CBs >50 cells. Notably, more cellularity was found in CBs performed by plasma-thrombin and in-house techniques (p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy to detect malignancy was 65.1% for CK19, 72.1% for HBME-1, and 70.3% for galectin-3. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, CB cellularity is essential for successful immunohistochemistry application and further diagnostic workup of AUS/FLUS cases.
Department of Biology Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Prague Pilsen Czechia
Department of Pathology Fimlab Laboratories Tampere Finland
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology Tampere University Tampere Finland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019489
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101048.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1159/000514906 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33789274
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Abram, Mikk $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland $u North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation, Tallinn, Estonia
- 245 14
- $a The Role of Cell Blocks and Immunohistochemistry in Thyroid Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance Bethesda Category / $c M. Abram, R. Huhtamella, D. Kalfert, H. Hakso-Mäkinen, M. Ludvíková, I. Kholová
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Thyroid cytology is a widely accepted tool in the clinical triaging of nodular lesions. Cell blocks (CBs) can help in the diagnosis of atypical lesions, namely, thyroid Bethesda category of Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). METHODS: In a series of 224 AUS/FLUS thyroid samples with CB, we studied CB cellularity and feasibility of 3 immunohistochemical markers (cytokeratin 19 [CK19], HBME-1, and galectin-3) apart and in combination. RESULTS: The CBs were non-diagnostic in 34 cases. Twenty-four CBs contained <10 cells, 45 CBs 10-50 cells, and 121 CBs >50 cells. Notably, more cellularity was found in CBs performed by plasma-thrombin and in-house techniques (p < 0.001). The diagnostic accuracy to detect malignancy was 65.1% for CK19, 72.1% for HBME-1, and 70.3% for galectin-3. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, CB cellularity is essential for successful immunohistochemistry application and further diagnostic workup of AUS/FLUS cases.
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x analýza $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a krevní proteiny $x analýza $7 D001798
- 650 _2
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 _2
- $a galektiny $x analýza $7 D037161
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a imunohistochemie $7 D007150
- 650 _2
- $a keratin-19 $x analýza $7 D053539
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň nádoru $7 D060787
- 650 12
- $a zalévání tkání do parafínu $7 D016612
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a nádory štítné žlázy $x chemie $x patologie $7 D013964
- 650 _2
- $a fixace tkání $7 D016707
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Huhtamella, Roope $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland $u Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Kalfert, David $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Motol, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Hakso-Mäkinen, Heli $u Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Ludvíková, Marie $u Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Kholová, Ivana $u Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland $u Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000033 $t Acta cytologica $x 1938-2650 $g Roč. 65, č. 3 (2021), s. 257-263
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33789274 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101048 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690336 $s 1139935
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 65 $c 3 $d 257-263 $e 20210331 $i 1938-2650 $m Acta cytologica $n Acta Cytol $x MED00000033
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728