Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Persistent occiput posterior position and stress distribution in levator ani muscle during vaginal delivery computed by a finite element model

L. Havelková, L. Krofta, P. Kochová, V. Liška, V. Kališ, J. Feyereisl

. 2020 ; 31 (7) : 1315-1324. [pub] 20190613

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
Q34 PROGRES, Charles University - International
CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007280 Application of Modern Technologies in Medicine and Industry - International

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Objective of this study was to develop an MRI-based finite element model and simulate a childbirth considering the fetal head position in a persistent occiput posterior position. METHODS: The model involves the pelvis, fetal head and soft tissues including the levator ani and obturator muscles simulated by the hyperelastic nonlinear Ogden material model. The uniaxial test was measured using pig samples of the levator to determine the material constants. Vaginal deliveries considering two positions of the fetal head were simulated: persistent occiput posterior position and uncomplicated occiput anterior position. The von Mises stress distribution was analyzed. RESULTS: The material constants of the hyperelastic Ogden model were measured for the samples of pig levator ani. The mean values of Ogden parameters were calculated as: μ1 = 8.2 ± 8.9 GPa; μ2 = 21.6 ± 17.3 GPa; α1 = 0.1803 ± 0.1299; α2 = 15.112 ± 3.1704. The results show the significant increase of the von Mises stress in the levator muscle for the case of a persistent occiput posterior position. For the optimal head position, the maximum stress was found in the anteromedial levator portion at station +8 (mean: 44.53 MPa). For the persistent occiput posterior position, the maximum was detected in the distal posteromedial levator portion at station +6 (mean: 120.28 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: The fetal head position during vaginal delivery significantly affects the stress distribution in the levator muscle. Considering the persistent occiput posterior position, the stress increases evenly 3.6 times compared with the optimal head position.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020399
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830102113.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00192-019-03997-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31197428
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Havelková, Linda $u New Technologies-Research Centre, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, Plzeň, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Persistent occiput posterior position and stress distribution in levator ani muscle during vaginal delivery computed by a finite element model / $c L. Havelková, L. Krofta, P. Kochová, V. Liška, V. Kališ, J. Feyereisl
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Objective of this study was to develop an MRI-based finite element model and simulate a childbirth considering the fetal head position in a persistent occiput posterior position. METHODS: The model involves the pelvis, fetal head and soft tissues including the levator ani and obturator muscles simulated by the hyperelastic nonlinear Ogden material model. The uniaxial test was measured using pig samples of the levator to determine the material constants. Vaginal deliveries considering two positions of the fetal head were simulated: persistent occiput posterior position and uncomplicated occiput anterior position. The von Mises stress distribution was analyzed. RESULTS: The material constants of the hyperelastic Ogden model were measured for the samples of pig levator ani. The mean values of Ogden parameters were calculated as: μ1 = 8.2 ± 8.9 GPa; μ2 = 21.6 ± 17.3 GPa; α1 = 0.1803 ± 0.1299; α2 = 15.112 ± 3.1704. The results show the significant increase of the von Mises stress in the levator muscle for the case of a persistent occiput posterior position. For the optimal head position, the maximum stress was found in the anteromedial levator portion at station +8 (mean: 44.53 MPa). For the persistent occiput posterior position, the maximum was detected in the distal posteromedial levator portion at station +6 (mean: 120.28 MPa). CONCLUSIONS: The fetal head position during vaginal delivery significantly affects the stress distribution in the levator muscle. Considering the persistent occiput posterior position, the stress increases evenly 3.6 times compared with the optimal head position.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a vedení porodu $7 D036861
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a plod $7 D005333
650    _2
$a analýza metodou konečných prvků $7 D020342
650    12
$a naléhání plodu $7 D007746
650    _2
$a pánevní dno $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D017773
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Krofta, Ladislav $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 14700, Praha, Czech Republic. ladislav.krofta@post.cz $u 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, Praha, Czech Republic. ladislav.krofta@post.cz
700    1_
$a Kochová, Petra $u European Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, Plzeň, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Liška, Václav $u European Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitní 22, Plzeň, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kališ, Vladimír $u Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Lidická 1, Plzeň, Czech Republic $u Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Plzeň, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Feyereisl, Jaroslav $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolské nábřeží 157, 14700, Praha, Czech Republic $u 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, Praha, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 31, č. 7 (2020), s. 1315-1324
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31197428 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830102114 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691052 $s 1140845
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 31 $c 7 $d 1315-1324 $e 20190613 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
GRA    __
$a Q34 $p PROGRES, Charles University $2 International
GRA    __
$a CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007280 $p Application of Modern Technologies in Medicine and Industry $2 International
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...