-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Fitting different visual models to behavioral patterns of parasitic egg rejection along a natural egg color gradient in a cavity-nesting host species
TJ. Manna, D. Hanley, M. Honza, M. Capek, J. Rutila, P. Samaš, M. Abolins-Abols, ME. Hauber
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- barva MeSH
- biologické modely * MeSH
- hnízdění fyziologie MeSH
- interakce hostitele a parazita MeSH
- ovum fyziologie MeSH
- Passeriformes fyziologie MeSH
- podněty MeSH
- ptáci fyziologie MeSH
- rozpoznávání (psychologie) MeSH
- vaječná skořápka * MeSH
- zraková percepce fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Avian brood parasites lay their eggs in other birds' nests, and hosts can mitigate the fitness cost of raising unrelated offspring by rejecting parasitic eggs. A visually-based cognitive mechanism often thought to be used by hosts to discriminate the foreign egg is to compare it against the hosts' own eggshell by size, shape, maculation, and/or ground coloration (i.e., absolute chromatic contrast). However, hosts may instead discriminate eggs based on their colors along a scale of natural avian eggshell coloration (i.e., directional chromatic contrast). In support of this latter visual process, recent research has found that directional chromatic contrasts can explain some host species' rejection behavior better than absolute chromatic or achromatic contrasts. Here, for the first time, we conducted an experiment in a cavity-nesting host species to test the predictions of these different visual mechanisms. We experimentally parasitized nests of the Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus, a regular host of a mimetic-egg laying Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus host-race, using painted, immaculate 3D-printed model eggs in two geographically distant areas (Finland and Czech Republic). We found that directional chromatic contrasts better explained rejection behaviors in both parasitized (Finland) and non-parasitized (Czech Republic) host populations, as hosts rejected eggs that were noticeably browner, but not eggs that were noticeably bluer, than redstart eggs. These results support the paradigm of a single rejection threshold predicted by the directional chromatic contrast model and contribute to a growing generality of these patterns across diverse avian host-brood parasite systems.
Department of Biology University of Louisville Louisville KY 40292 United States
Institute of Vertebrate Biology Czech Academy of Sciences Kvetna 8 603 65 Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020791
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830102432.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.visres.2019.12.007 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31958715
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Manna, Thomas J $u Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center, City University of New York, NY 10065, United States
- 245 10
- $a Fitting different visual models to behavioral patterns of parasitic egg rejection along a natural egg color gradient in a cavity-nesting host species / $c TJ. Manna, D. Hanley, M. Honza, M. Capek, J. Rutila, P. Samaš, M. Abolins-Abols, ME. Hauber
- 520 9_
- $a Avian brood parasites lay their eggs in other birds' nests, and hosts can mitigate the fitness cost of raising unrelated offspring by rejecting parasitic eggs. A visually-based cognitive mechanism often thought to be used by hosts to discriminate the foreign egg is to compare it against the hosts' own eggshell by size, shape, maculation, and/or ground coloration (i.e., absolute chromatic contrast). However, hosts may instead discriminate eggs based on their colors along a scale of natural avian eggshell coloration (i.e., directional chromatic contrast). In support of this latter visual process, recent research has found that directional chromatic contrasts can explain some host species' rejection behavior better than absolute chromatic or achromatic contrasts. Here, for the first time, we conducted an experiment in a cavity-nesting host species to test the predictions of these different visual mechanisms. We experimentally parasitized nests of the Common Redstart Phoenicurus phoenicurus, a regular host of a mimetic-egg laying Common Cuckoo Cuculus canorus host-race, using painted, immaculate 3D-printed model eggs in two geographically distant areas (Finland and Czech Republic). We found that directional chromatic contrasts better explained rejection behaviors in both parasitized (Finland) and non-parasitized (Czech Republic) host populations, as hosts rejected eggs that were noticeably browner, but not eggs that were noticeably bluer, than redstart eggs. These results support the paradigm of a single rejection threshold predicted by the directional chromatic contrast model and contribute to a growing generality of these patterns across diverse avian host-brood parasite systems.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a ptáci $x fyziologie $7 D001717
- 650 _2
- $a barva $7 D003116
- 650 _2
- $a podněty $7 D003463
- 650 12
- $a vaječná skořápka $7 D004528
- 650 _2
- $a interakce hostitele a parazita $7 D006790
- 650 12
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a hnízdění $x fyziologie $7 D009425
- 650 _2
- $a ovum $x fyziologie $7 D010063
- 650 _2
- $a Passeriformes $x fyziologie $7 D046109
- 650 _2
- $a rozpoznávání (psychologie) $7 D021641
- 650 _2
- $a zraková percepce $x fyziologie $7 D014796
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hanley, Daniel $u Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Long Island University - Post, Brookville, NY 11548, United States
- 700 1_
- $a Honza, Marcel $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Kvetna 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Capek, Miroslav $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Kvetna 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rutila, Jarkko $u Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, United States
- 700 1_
- $a Samaš, Peter $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Kvetna 8, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Abolins-Abols, Mikus $u Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, United States
- 700 1_
- $a Hauber, Mark E $u Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, United States; Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801, United States. Electronic address: mhauber@illinois.edu
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004667 $t Vision research $x 1878-5646 $g Roč. 167, č. - (2020), s. 54-59
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31958715 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830102432 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1691382 $s 1141237
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 167 $c - $d 54-59 $e 20200117 $i 1878-5646 $m Vision research $n Vision Res $x MED00004667
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728