• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Assessment of Electrospun and Ultra-lightweight Polypropylene Meshes in the Sheep Model for Vaginal Surgery

L. Hympánová, R. Rynkevic, S. Román, MGMC. Mori da Cunha, E. Mazza, M. Zündel, I. Urbánková, MR. Gallego, J. Vange, G. Callewaert, C. Chapple, S. MacNeil, J. Deprest

. 2020 ; 6 (1) : 190-198. [pub] 20180723

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21020798

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to develop better materials to provide anatomical support to the pelvic floor without compromising its function. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess outcomes after simulated vaginal prolapse repair in a sheep model using three different materials: (1) ultra-lightweight polypropylene (PP) non-degradable textile (Restorelle) mesh, (2) electrospun biodegradable ureidopyrimidinone-polycarbonate (UPy-PC), and (3) electrospun non-degradable polyurethane (PU) mesh in comparison with simulated native tissue repair (NTR). These implants may reduce implant-related complications and avoid vaginal function loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A controlled trial was performed involving 48 ewes that underwent NTR or mesh repair with PP, UPy-PC, or PU meshes (n=12/group). Explants were examined 60 and 180 d (six per group) post-implantation. INTERVENTION: Posterior rectovaginal dissection, NTR, or mesh repair. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Implant-related complications, vaginal contractility, compliance, and host response were assessed. Power calculation and analysis of variance testing were used to enable comparison between the four groups. RESULTS: There were no visible implant-related complications. None of the implants compromised vaginal wall contractility, and passive biomechanical properties were similar to those after NTR. Shrinkage over the surgery area was around 35% for NTR and all mesh-augmented repairs. All materials were integrated well with similar connective tissue composition, vascularization, and innervation. The inflammatory response was mild with electrospun implants, inducing both more macrophages yet with relatively more type 2 macrophages present at an early stage than the PP mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Three very different materials were all well tolerated in the sheep vagina. Biomechanical findings were similar for all mesh-augmented repair and NTR. Constructs induced slightly different mid-term inflammatory profiles. PATIENT SUMMARY: Product innovation is needed to reduce implant-related complications. We tested two novel implants, electrospun and an ultra-lightweight polypropylene textile mesh, in a physiologically relevant model for vaginal surgery. All gave encouraging outcomes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020798
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830102437.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.euf.2018.07.024 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30049658
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Hympánová, Lucie $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Assessment of Electrospun and Ultra-lightweight Polypropylene Meshes in the Sheep Model for Vaginal Surgery / $c L. Hympánová, R. Rynkevic, S. Román, MGMC. Mori da Cunha, E. Mazza, M. Zündel, I. Urbánková, MR. Gallego, J. Vange, G. Callewaert, C. Chapple, S. MacNeil, J. Deprest
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need to develop better materials to provide anatomical support to the pelvic floor without compromising its function. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess outcomes after simulated vaginal prolapse repair in a sheep model using three different materials: (1) ultra-lightweight polypropylene (PP) non-degradable textile (Restorelle) mesh, (2) electrospun biodegradable ureidopyrimidinone-polycarbonate (UPy-PC), and (3) electrospun non-degradable polyurethane (PU) mesh in comparison with simulated native tissue repair (NTR). These implants may reduce implant-related complications and avoid vaginal function loss. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A controlled trial was performed involving 48 ewes that underwent NTR or mesh repair with PP, UPy-PC, or PU meshes (n=12/group). Explants were examined 60 and 180 d (six per group) post-implantation. INTERVENTION: Posterior rectovaginal dissection, NTR, or mesh repair. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Implant-related complications, vaginal contractility, compliance, and host response were assessed. Power calculation and analysis of variance testing were used to enable comparison between the four groups. RESULTS: There were no visible implant-related complications. None of the implants compromised vaginal wall contractility, and passive biomechanical properties were similar to those after NTR. Shrinkage over the surgery area was around 35% for NTR and all mesh-augmented repairs. All materials were integrated well with similar connective tissue composition, vascularization, and innervation. The inflammatory response was mild with electrospun implants, inducing both more macrophages yet with relatively more type 2 macrophages present at an early stage than the PP mesh. CONCLUSIONS: Three very different materials were all well tolerated in the sheep vagina. Biomechanical findings were similar for all mesh-augmented repair and NTR. Constructs induced slightly different mid-term inflammatory profiles. PATIENT SUMMARY: Product innovation is needed to reduce implant-related complications. We tested two novel implants, electrospun and an ultra-lightweight polypropylene textile mesh, in a physiologically relevant model for vaginal surgery. All gave encouraging outcomes.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biokompatibilní materiály $7 D001672
650    _2
$a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a gynekologické chirurgické výkony $7 D013509
650    _2
$a testování materiálů $7 D008422
650    _2
$a modely u zvířat $7 D023421
650    12
$a polypropyleny $7 D011126
650    _2
$a protézy - design $7 D011474
650    _2
$a pyrimidinony $7 D011744
650    _2
$a ovce $7 D012756
650    12
$a chirurgické síťky $7 D013526
650    _2
$a textilie $7 D013784
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a prolaps dělohy $x chirurgie $7 D014596
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Rynkevic, Rita $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; INEGI, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
700    1_
$a Román, Sabiniano $u Department of Materials and Science Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
700    1_
$a Mori da Cunha, Marina G M C $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Mazza, Edoardo $u Institute of Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; EMPA, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Zündel, Manuel $u Institute of Mechanical Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Urbánková, Iva $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Gallego, Monica R $u Coloplast A/S, Global R&D, Biomaterials, Humlebæk, Denmark
700    1_
$a Vange, Jakob $u Coloplast A/S, Global R&D, Biomaterials, Humlebæk, Denmark
700    1_
$a Callewaert, Geertje $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
700    1_
$a Chapple, Christopher $u The Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK
700    1_
$a MacNeil, Sheila $u Department of Materials and Science Engineering, Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
700    1_
$a Deprest, Jan $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: Jan.Deprest@uzleuven.be
773    0_
$w MED00193513 $t European urology focus $x 2405-4569 $g Roč. 6, č. 1 (2020), s. 190-198
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30049658 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830102437 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691389 $s 1141244
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 6 $c 1 $d 190-198 $e 20180723 $i 2405-4569 $m European urology focus $n Eur Urol Focus $x MED00193513
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace