-
Something wrong with this record ?
Audio-visual navigation reduces treatment time in deep-inspiration breath hold radiotherapy
M. Dolezel, K. Odrazka, J. Vanasek, I. Hartmann, T. Kohlova, Z. Vlachova
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
PubMed
31602046
DOI
10.5507/bp.2019.051
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms radiotherapy MeSH
- Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted methods MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Breath Holding * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment times for deep-inspiration breath hold with and without audio-visual (A-V) navigation. METHODS: We measured the real treatment time in 60 patients with breast cancer undergoing postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty consecutive patients were treated without deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and another 30 patients using deep-inspiration breath hold (10 patients with DIBH only, 10 patients with DIBH using visual feedback and 10 patients with DIBH using visual feedback following breath training). The treatment time was relativized to number of fields and 100 monitor units (MU). The independent t-test was used to analyse differences between cohorts. RESULTS: The mean treatment time for patients without DIBH was 46.5 seconds per field and 90.9 seconds per 100 MU, for DIBH only 92.3 and 170.2 seconds, for DIBH with audio-visual navigation 68.1 and 133.8 seconds, and for DIBH with A-V feedback including breath training 66.1 and 132.5 seconds. The treatment times for patients treated using DIBH with visual navigation were significantly shorter in comparison with patients without visual feedback. We were not able to prove any significant benefit for breath training in terms of reducing the treatment time. CONCLUSION: Audio-visual navigation enables to significantly reduce the treatment time in comparison with DIBH without A-V feedback.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Oncology Centre Multiscan and Pardubice Regional Hospital Pardubice Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21023714
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211104134118.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211005s2020 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2019.051 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31602046
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Doležel, Martin $7 xx0075943 $u Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic $u Oncology Centre, Multiscan and Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice, Czech Republic $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Audio-visual navigation reduces treatment time in deep-inspiration breath hold radiotherapy / $c M. Dolezel, K. Odrazka, J. Vanasek, I. Hartmann, T. Kohlova, Z. Vlachova
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: The purpose of this study was to compare the treatment times for deep-inspiration breath hold with and without audio-visual (A-V) navigation. METHODS: We measured the real treatment time in 60 patients with breast cancer undergoing postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty consecutive patients were treated without deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and another 30 patients using deep-inspiration breath hold (10 patients with DIBH only, 10 patients with DIBH using visual feedback and 10 patients with DIBH using visual feedback following breath training). The treatment time was relativized to number of fields and 100 monitor units (MU). The independent t-test was used to analyse differences between cohorts. RESULTS: The mean treatment time for patients without DIBH was 46.5 seconds per field and 90.9 seconds per 100 MU, for DIBH only 92.3 and 170.2 seconds, for DIBH with audio-visual navigation 68.1 and 133.8 seconds, and for DIBH with A-V feedback including breath training 66.1 and 132.5 seconds. The treatment times for patients treated using DIBH with visual navigation were significantly shorter in comparison with patients without visual feedback. We were not able to prove any significant benefit for breath training in terms of reducing the treatment time. CONCLUSION: Audio-visual navigation enables to significantly reduce the treatment time in comparison with DIBH without A-V feedback.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prsu $x radioterapie $7 D001943
- 650 12
- $a zadržování dechu $7 D062485
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Odrážka, Karel $7 mzk2002148290 $u Oncology Centre, Multiscan and Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice, Czech Republic $u First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vaňásek, Jaroslav, $d 1952- $7 nlk19990073982 $u Oncology Centre, Multiscan and Pardubice Regional Hospital, Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hartmann, Igor $7 xx0064383 $u Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kohlová, Tereza $7 xx0127950 $u Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vlachová, Zuzana $7 xx0231645 $u Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 164, č. 4 (2020), s. 461-466
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31602046 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211007134411 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1718902 $s 1144208
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 164 $c 4 $d 461-466 $e 20191010 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20211005