BACKGROUND: Bazett formula is frequently used in paediatric screening for the long QT syndrome (LQTS) and proposals exist that using standing rather than supine electrocardiograms (ECG) improves the sensitivity of LQTS diagnosis. Nevertheless, compared to adults, children have higher heart rates (especially during postural provocations) and Bazett correction is also known to lead to artificially prolonged QTc values at increased heart rates. This study assessed the incidence of erroneously increased QTc values in normal children without QT abnormalities. METHODS: Continuous 12-lead ECGs were recorded in 332 healthy children (166 girls) aged 10.7 ± 2.6 years while they performed postural manoeuvring consisting of episodes (in the following order) of supine, sitting, standing, supine, standing, sitting, and supine positions, each lasting 10 min. Detailed analyses of QT/RR profiles confirmed the absence of prolonged individually corrected QTc interval in each child. Heart rate and QT intervals were measured in 10-s ECG segments and in each segment, QTc intervals were obtained using Bazett, Fridericia, and Framingham formulas. In each child, the heart rates and QTc values obtained during supine, sitting and standing positions were averaged. QTc durations by the three formulas were classified to < 440 ms, 440-460 ms, 460-480 ms, and > 480 ms. RESULTS: At supine position, averaged heart rate was 77.5 ± 10.5 beat per minute (bpm) and Bazett, Fridericia and Framingham QTc intervals were 425.3 ± 15.8, 407.8 ± 13.9, and 408.2 ± 13.1 ms, respectively. At sitting and standing, averaged heart rate increased to 90.9 ± 10.1 and 100.9 ± 10.5 bpm, respectively. While Fridericia and Framingham formulas showed only minimal QTc changes, Bazett correction led to QTc increases to 435 ± 15.1 and 444.9 ± 15.9 ms at sitting and standing, respectively. At sitting, Bazett correction identified 51, 4, and 0 children as having the QTc intervals 440-460, 460-480, and > 480 ms, respectively. At sitting, these numbers increased to 118, 11, and 1, while on standing these numbers were 151, 45, and 5, respectively. Irrespective of the postural position, Fridericia and Framingham formulas identified only a small number (< 7) of children with QT interval between 440 and 460 ms and no children with longer QTc. CONCLUSION: During screening for LQTS in children, the use of Bazett formula leads to a high number of false positive cases especially if the heart rates are increased (e.g. by postural manoeuvring). The use of Fridericia formula can be recommended to replace the Bazett correction not only for adult but also for paediatric ECGs.

Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology Faculty of Medicine University Hospital Brno Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College ICTEM Hammersmith Campus 72 Du Cane Road Shepherd's Bush London W12 0NN England

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Garrod AH. On the relative duration of the component parts of the radial sphygmograph trace in health. J Anat Physiol. 1870;18:351–354.

Malik M, Färbom P, Batchvarov V, Hnatkova K, Camm AJ. Relation between QT and RR intervals is highly individual among healthy subjects: implications for heart rate correction of the QT interval. Heart. 2002;87:220–228. doi: 10.1136/heart.87.3.220. PubMed DOI PMC

Batchvarov VN, Ghuran A, Smetana P, Hnatkova K, Harries M, Dilaveris P, Camm AJ, Malik M. QT-RR relationship in healthy subjects exhibits substantial intersubject variability and high intrasubject stability. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002;282:H2356–H2363. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00860.2001. PubMed DOI

Garnett CE, Zhu H, Malik M, Fossa AA, Zhang J, Badilini F, Li J, Darpö B, Sager P, Rodriguez I. Methodologies to characterize the QT/corrected QT interval in the presence of drug-induced heart rate changes or other autonomic effects. Am Heart J. 2012;163:912–930. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.02.023. PubMed DOI

Bazett JC. An analysis of time relations of electrocardiograms. Heart. 1920;7:353–367.

Fridericia LS. Die Systolendauer im Elekrokardiogramm bei normalen Menschen und bei Herzkranken. Acta Med Scand. 1920;53:469–486. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1920.tb18266.x. DOI

Sagie A, Larson MG, Goldberg RJ, Bengtson JR, Levy D. An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham study) Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:797–801. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90562-D. PubMed DOI

Hodges M, Salerno D, Erlien D. Bazett’s QT correction reviewed: evidence that a linear QT correction for heart rate is better. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;1:694.

Hnatkova K, Vicente J, Johannesen L, Garnett C, Stockbridge N, Malik M. Errors of fixed QT heart rate corrections used in the assessment of drug-induced QTc changes. Front Physiol. 2019;10:635. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00635. PubMed DOI PMC

Grosso J, Groepenhoff H, Paridon SM, Brothers JA. Normative values for cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing using ramp cycle ergometry in children and adolescents. J Pediatr. 2020:S0022–3476(20)31146-X. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.09.018. PubMed

Funck-Brentano C, Jaillon P. Rate-corrected QT interval: techniques and limitations. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:17B–22B. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90035-B. PubMed DOI

Vinet A, Dubé B, Nadeau R, Mahiddine O, Jacquemet V. Estimation of the QT-RR relation: trade-off between goodness-of-fit and extrapolation accuracy. Physiol Meas. 2017;38:397–419. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa57b4. PubMed DOI

Reynisson B, Tanghöj G, Naumburg E. QTc interval-dependent body posture in pediatrics. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20:107. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1959-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Andršová I, Hnatkova K, Helánová K, Šišáková M, Novotný T, Kala P, Malik M. Individually rate corrected QTc intervals in children and adolescents. Front Physiol. 2019;10:994. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00994. PubMed DOI PMC

Malik M, Andreas JO, Hnatkova K, Hoeckendorff J, Cawello W, Middle M, Horstmann R, Braun M. Thorough QT/QTc study in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease: cardiac safety of rotigotine. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;84:595–603. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.143. PubMed DOI

Malik M, van Gelderen EM, Lee JH, Kowalski DL, Yen M, Goldwater R, Mujais SK, Schaddelee MP, de Koning P, Kaibara A, Moy SS, Keirns JJ. Proarrhythmic safety of repeat doses of mirabegron in healthy subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-, and active-controlled thorough QT study. Clin Pharm Therap. 2012;92:696–706. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.181. PubMed DOI

Hnatkova K, Smetana P, Toman O, Bauer A, Schmidt G, Malik M. Systematic comparisons of electrocardiographic morphology increase the precision of QT interval measurement. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009;32:119–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02185.x. PubMed DOI

Gravel H, Jacquemet V, Dahdah N, Curnier D. Clinical applications of QT/RR hysteresis assessment: a systematic review. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018;23:e12514. doi: 10.1111/anec.12514. PubMed DOI PMC

Johnson JN, Ackerman MJ. QTc: how long is too long? Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:657–662. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.054734. PubMed DOI PMC

Tester DJ, Will ML, Haglund CM, Ackerman MJ. Effect of clinical phenotype on yield of long QT syndrome genetic testing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:764–768. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.09.056. PubMed DOI

Malik M, Hnatkova K, Batchvarov V, Gang Y, Smetana P, Camm AJ. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27:1659–1669. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00701.x. PubMed DOI

Rautaharju PM, Warren JW, Calhoun HP. Estimation of QT prolongation. A persistent, avoidable error in computer electrocardiography. J Electrocardiol. 1990;23(Suppl):111–117. doi: 10.1016/0022-0736(90)90085-G. PubMed DOI

Hazeki D, Yoshinaga M, Takahashi H, Tanaka Y, Haraguchi Y, Abe M, Koga M, Fukushige T, Nagashima M. Cut-offs for screening prolonged QT intervals from Fridericia's formula in children and adolescents. Circ J. 2010;74:1663–1669. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-09-0979. PubMed DOI

Malik M. If Dr. Bazett had had a computer... Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1996; 19:1635–1639. PubMed

Sarma JSM, Sarma RJ, Bilitch M, Katz D, Song SL. An exponential formula for heart rate dependence of QT interval during exercise and pacing in humans: reevaluation of Bazett’s formula. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:103–108. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90312-6. PubMed DOI

van der Wall HEC, Gal P, Kemme MJB, van Westen GJP, Burggraaf J. Number of ECG replicates and QT correction formula influences the estimated QT prolonging effect of a drug. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2019;73:257–264. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000657. PubMed DOI

Gueta I, Klempfner R, Markovits N, Halkin H, Segev S, Rott D, Peled Y, Loebstein R. Clinically significant incidental QTc prolongation is subject to within-individual variability. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2020;25:e12699. doi: 10.1111/anec.12699. PubMed DOI PMC

Malik M, Garnett C, Hnatkova K, Vicente J, Johannesen L, Stockbridge N. Implications of individual QT/RR profiles-part 1: inaccuracies and problems of population-specific QT/heart rate corrections. Drug Saf. 2019;42:401–414. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0736-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Malik M, Johannesen L, Hnatkova K, Stockbridge N. Universal correction for QT/RR hysteresis. Drug Saf. 2016;39:577–588. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0406-0. PubMed DOI

Stramba-Badiale M, Karnad DR, Goulene KM, Panicker GK, Dagradi F, Spazzolini C, Kothari S, Lokhandwala YY, Schwartz PJ. For neonatal ECG screening there is no reason to relinquish old Bazett's correction. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2888–2895. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy284. PubMed DOI

Hnatkova K, Johannesen L, Vicente J, Malik M. Heart rate dependency of JT interval sections. J Electrocardiol. 2017;50:814–824. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2017.08.005. PubMed DOI

Phan DQ, Silka MJ, Lan YT, Chang RK. Comparison of formulas for calculation of the corrected QT interval in infants and young children. J Pediatr. 2015;166:960–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.037. PubMed DOI PMC

Garson A, Jr, Dick M, 2nd, Fournier A, Gillette PC, Hamilton R, Kugler JD, van Hare GF, 3rd, Vetter V, Vick GW., 3rd The long QT syndrome in children. An international study of 287 patients. Circulation. 1993;87:1866–1872. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.87.6.1866. PubMed DOI

Influence of heart rate correction formulas on QTc interval stability