-
Something wrong with this record ?
Use of Simultaneous Bilateral Cataract Surgery (SBCS) to Optimize Parameters Affecting the Subjective Perception of the Procedure
P. Studený, J. Vránová, L. Nováček
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2009
Free Medical Journals
from 2009
PubMed Central
from 2009
Europe PubMed Central
from 2009
ProQuest Central
from 2013-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2009-04-26
Open Access Digital Library
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2009-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2013-01-01
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
from 2009
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2009
PubMed
34194819
DOI
10.1155/2021/5584906
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Introduction: Simultaneous Bilateral Cataract Surgery (SBCS) is still a relatively controversial procedure. The main objection is the risk of bilateral endophthalmitis or bilateral refractive error. However, SBCS has also some advantages (faster visual rehabilitation, lower risk of nosocomial infection, and lower cost). Performing surgery on both eyes in one session has one additional advantage which has not yet been described in the literature (according to the information available to authors). It allows surgeons to distinguish the effect of minor differences in the surgical protocol on the subjective perception of the procedure more accurately, which is a more suitable method than comparing two independent groups of patients. Purpose: To compare the effect of minor changes in the surgical protocol during SBCS on intraindividual subjective perception of surgery (pain, pressure, glare, and perception of the duration of the surgery). Methods: During the surgery of the right and left eyes of one patient, we randomly changed one surgical parameter (use of intracameral anesthesia, light intensity of the operating microscope, type of eyelid speculum, creation of the posterior circular capsulorhexis, and communication with the patient during surgery). Patients immediately after both surgeries subjectively evaluated the perception of pain (on the scale 0-10), pressure, and glare (on the scale 0-5) and estimated the duration of the surgery, separately for each eye. Each change was evaluated in a group of 50 patients. Results: In the control group with no parameters changed, we noted no difference in subjective perception of the first and second surgery. In subgroups, where we changed the protocol, we detected only minor differences in subjective perception of pain, pressure, glare, and duration of the surgery. Only one statistically significant difference in subjective pain perception was in the subgroup where we used eye intracameral anesthesia (0.34 eyes with intracameral anesthesia, 0.44 eyes with only topical anesthesia). We did not note any statistically significant differences in the perception of the time of surgery. Conclusion: SBCS can be used to optimize the parameters of cataract surgery. In our study, we noted a positive effect of intracameral anesthesia on subjective perception of surgery.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21024582
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211013133853.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211006s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1155/2021/5584906 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34194819
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Studený, P $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Eye Clinic Somich, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Use of Simultaneous Bilateral Cataract Surgery (SBCS) to Optimize Parameters Affecting the Subjective Perception of the Procedure / $c P. Studený, J. Vránová, L. Nováček
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction: Simultaneous Bilateral Cataract Surgery (SBCS) is still a relatively controversial procedure. The main objection is the risk of bilateral endophthalmitis or bilateral refractive error. However, SBCS has also some advantages (faster visual rehabilitation, lower risk of nosocomial infection, and lower cost). Performing surgery on both eyes in one session has one additional advantage which has not yet been described in the literature (according to the information available to authors). It allows surgeons to distinguish the effect of minor differences in the surgical protocol on the subjective perception of the procedure more accurately, which is a more suitable method than comparing two independent groups of patients. Purpose: To compare the effect of minor changes in the surgical protocol during SBCS on intraindividual subjective perception of surgery (pain, pressure, glare, and perception of the duration of the surgery). Methods: During the surgery of the right and left eyes of one patient, we randomly changed one surgical parameter (use of intracameral anesthesia, light intensity of the operating microscope, type of eyelid speculum, creation of the posterior circular capsulorhexis, and communication with the patient during surgery). Patients immediately after both surgeries subjectively evaluated the perception of pain (on the scale 0-10), pressure, and glare (on the scale 0-5) and estimated the duration of the surgery, separately for each eye. Each change was evaluated in a group of 50 patients. Results: In the control group with no parameters changed, we noted no difference in subjective perception of the first and second surgery. In subgroups, where we changed the protocol, we detected only minor differences in subjective perception of pain, pressure, glare, and duration of the surgery. Only one statistically significant difference in subjective pain perception was in the subgroup where we used eye intracameral anesthesia (0.34 eyes with intracameral anesthesia, 0.44 eyes with only topical anesthesia). We did not note any statistically significant differences in the perception of the time of surgery. Conclusion: SBCS can be used to optimize the parameters of cataract surgery. In our study, we noted a positive effect of intracameral anesthesia on subjective perception of surgery.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vránová, J $u Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nováček, L $u Department of Ophthalmology, The Institute of Aviation Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00169091 $t Journal of ophthalmology $x 2090-004X $g Roč. 2021, č. - (2021), s. 5584906
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34194819 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211006 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211013133850 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1708383 $s 1145079
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 2021 $c - $d 5584906 $e 20210611 $i 2090-004X $m Journal of Ophthalmology $n J Ophthalmol $x MED00169091
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211006