-
Something wrong with this record ?
Improving the laboratory result release process in the light of ISO 15189:2012 standard
H. Can Çubukçu, F. Vanstapel, M. Thelen, FA. Bernabeu-Andreu, M. van Schrojenstein Lantman, D. Brugnoni, P. Mesko Brguljan, N. Milinkovic, S. Linko, M. Vaubourdolle, R. O'Kelly, C. Kroupis, M. Lohmander, L. Šprongl, M. Panteghini, G. Boursier,...
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Accreditation * MeSH
- Clinical Laboratory Techniques MeSH
- Laboratories * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Quality Control MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The ISO 15189:2012 standard section 5.9.1 requires laboratories to review results before release, considering quality control, previous results, and clinical information, if any, and to issue documented procedures about it. While laboratory result reporting is generally regarded as part of the post-analytical phase, the result release process requires a general view of the total examination process. Reviewing test results may follow with troubleshooting and test repetition, including reanalyzing an individual sample or resampling. A systematic understanding of the result release may help laboratory professionals carry out appropriate test repetition and ensure the plausibility of laboratory results. In this paper, we addressed the crucial steps in the result release process, including evaluation of sample quality, critical result notification, result reporting, and recommendations for the management of the result release, considering quality control alerts, instrument flags, warning messages, and interference indexes. Error detection tools and plausibility checks mentioned in the present paper can support the daily practice of results release.
Association of Clinical Biochemists in Ireland Ireland
Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Spedali Civili Brescia Italy
Clinical Laboratory Hospital Kladno Kladno Czech Republic
Department of Laboratory Medicine Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Medical Biochemistry Pharmaceutical Faculty University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia
Linko Q Solutions FI 00950 Helsinki Finland
Pôle de Biologie Médicale et Pathologie Site Saint Antoine Paris France
Regional Laboratoriemedicin Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset Trollhättan Göteborg Sweden
Result Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry Amphia Hospital Breda the Netherlands
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21024872
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026134316.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.cca.2021.08.013 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34418364
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Can Çubukçu, Hikmet $u Ankara University Stem Cell Institute, Interdisciplinary Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: hikmetcancubukcu@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Improving the laboratory result release process in the light of ISO 15189:2012 standard / $c H. Can Çubukçu, F. Vanstapel, M. Thelen, FA. Bernabeu-Andreu, M. van Schrojenstein Lantman, D. Brugnoni, P. Mesko Brguljan, N. Milinkovic, S. Linko, M. Vaubourdolle, R. O'Kelly, C. Kroupis, M. Lohmander, L. Šprongl, M. Panteghini, G. Boursier, European Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine EFLM Working Group Accreditation, ISO/CEN standards WG-A/ISO
- 520 9_
- $a The ISO 15189:2012 standard section 5.9.1 requires laboratories to review results before release, considering quality control, previous results, and clinical information, if any, and to issue documented procedures about it. While laboratory result reporting is generally regarded as part of the post-analytical phase, the result release process requires a general view of the total examination process. Reviewing test results may follow with troubleshooting and test repetition, including reanalyzing an individual sample or resampling. A systematic understanding of the result release may help laboratory professionals carry out appropriate test repetition and ensure the plausibility of laboratory results. In this paper, we addressed the crucial steps in the result release process, including evaluation of sample quality, critical result notification, result reporting, and recommendations for the management of the result release, considering quality control alerts, instrument flags, warning messages, and interference indexes. Error detection tools and plausibility checks mentioned in the present paper can support the daily practice of results release.
- 650 12
- $a akreditace $7 D000068
- 650 _2
- $a klinické laboratorní techniky $7 D019411
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a laboratoře $7 D007753
- 650 _2
- $a řízení kvality $7 D011786
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vanstapel, Florent $u Laboratory Medicine, Department of Public Health, Biomedical Sciences Group, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Thelen, Marc $u Result Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry, Amphia Hospital Breda, the Netherlands,; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Bernabeu-Andreu, Francisco A $u Servicio Bioquímica - Análisis Clínicos Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a van Schrojenstein Lantman, Marith $u Result Laboratory for Clinical Chemistry, Amphia Hospital Breda, the Netherlands,; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Brugnoni, Duilio $u Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Mesko Brguljan, Pika $u Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Deseases, Golnik, Slovenia
- 700 1_
- $a Milinkovic, Neda $u Department of Medical Biochemistry, Pharmaceutical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
- 700 1_
- $a Linko, Solveig $u Linko Q-Solutions, FI-00950 Helsinki, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Vaubourdolle, Michel $u Pôle de Biologie Médicale et Pathologie, Site Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
- 700 1_
- $a O'Kelly, Ruth $u Association of Clinical Biochemists in Ireland, Ireland
- 700 1_
- $a Kroupis, Christos $u Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Attikon University General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Haidari, Greece
- 700 1_
- $a Lohmander, Maria $u Regional Laboratoriemedicin, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Trollhättan/Göteborg, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Šprongl, Luděk $u Clinical Laboratory, Hospital Kladno, Kladno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Panteghini, Mauro $u Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "Luigi Sacco", and Research Centre for Metrological Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (CIRME), University of Milan, Milano, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Boursier, Guilaine $u Dept of Genetics, Rare Diseases and Personalized Medicine Rare Diseases and Autoinflammatory Unit, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- 710 2_
- $a European Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Laboratory Medicine EFLM Working Group Accreditation, ISO/CEN standards WG-A/ISO
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009464 $t Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry $x 1873-3492 $g Roč. 522, č. - (2021), s. 167-173
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34418364 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026134322 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714087 $s 1145379
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 522 $c - $d 167-173 $e 20210818 $i 1873-3492 $m Clinica chimica acta $n Clin Chim Acta $x MED00009464
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013
