-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Detecting Binocular Diplopia in Orbital Floor Blowout Fractures: Superiority of the Orthoptic Approach
J. Timkovic, J. Stransky, P. Handlos, J. Janosek, H. Tomaskova, J. Stembirek
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
MZCR - RVO - FNOs/2017
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2007
PubMed Central
od 2018
Europe PubMed Central
od 2018
ProQuest Central
od 2018-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2018-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2007
PubMed
34577912
DOI
10.3390/medicina57090989
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- diplopie diagnóza etiologie MeSH
- fraktury očnice * komplikace diagnóza MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ortoptika MeSH
- poruchy hybnosti oka * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background and Objectives: In patients with orbital floor blowout fracture (OFBF), accurate diagnosis of ocular motility disorder is important for decisions about conservative or surgical therapy. However, the accuracy of the traditional test for detecting binocular diplopia/ocular motility disorder using a moving pencil or finger (hereinafter, "finger test") has been generally accepted as correct and has not been subject to scrutiny so far. Hence, its accuracy relative to full orthoptic examination is unknown. Materials and Methods: In this paper, the results of the "finger test" were compared with those derived from a complex examination by orthoptic tests (considered "true" value in patients with OFBF). Results: "Finger test" detected ocular motility disorder in 23% of patients while the full orthoptic examination proved much more efficient, detecting ocular motility disorder in 65% of patients. Lancaster screen test and test with color filters were the most important tests in the battery of the orthoptic tests, capable of identifying 97.7% and 95.3% of patients with ocular motility disorder, respectively. Still, none of the tests were able to correctly detect all patients with ocular motility disorder in itself. Conclusions: As the presence of ocular motility disorder/binocular diplopia is an important indication criterion for the surgical solution of the orbital floor blowout fracture, we conclude that a complex orthoptic evaluation should be always performed in these patients.
Center for Health Research Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava 703 00 Ostrava Czech Republic
Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University Hospital Ostrava 708 52 Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Forensic Medicine University Hospital Ostrava 708 52 Ostrava Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21024945
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026134247.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/medicina57090989 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34577912
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Timkovic, Juraj $u Clinic of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 1790/5, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Craniofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Detecting Binocular Diplopia in Orbital Floor Blowout Fractures: Superiority of the Orthoptic Approach / $c J. Timkovic, J. Stransky, P. Handlos, J. Janosek, H. Tomaskova, J. Stembirek
- 520 9_
- $a Background and Objectives: In patients with orbital floor blowout fracture (OFBF), accurate diagnosis of ocular motility disorder is important for decisions about conservative or surgical therapy. However, the accuracy of the traditional test for detecting binocular diplopia/ocular motility disorder using a moving pencil or finger (hereinafter, "finger test") has been generally accepted as correct and has not been subject to scrutiny so far. Hence, its accuracy relative to full orthoptic examination is unknown. Materials and Methods: In this paper, the results of the "finger test" were compared with those derived from a complex examination by orthoptic tests (considered "true" value in patients with OFBF). Results: "Finger test" detected ocular motility disorder in 23% of patients while the full orthoptic examination proved much more efficient, detecting ocular motility disorder in 65% of patients. Lancaster screen test and test with color filters were the most important tests in the battery of the orthoptic tests, capable of identifying 97.7% and 95.3% of patients with ocular motility disorder, respectively. Still, none of the tests were able to correctly detect all patients with ocular motility disorder in itself. Conclusions: As the presence of ocular motility disorder/binocular diplopia is an important indication criterion for the surgical solution of the orbital floor blowout fracture, we conclude that a complex orthoptic evaluation should be always performed in these patients.
- 650 _2
- $a diplopie $x diagnóza $x etiologie $7 D004172
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a poruchy hybnosti oka $7 D015835
- 650 12
- $a fraktury očnice $x komplikace $x diagnóza $7 D009917
- 650 _2
- $a ortoptika $7 D009988
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Stransky, Jiri $u Department of Craniofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Handlos, Petr $u Department of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Janosek, Jaroslav $u Center for Health Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Tomaskova, Hana $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Stembirek, Jan $u Department of Craniofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Laboratory of Molecular Morphogenesis, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics CAS, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180386 $t Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) $x 1648-9144 $g Roč. 57, č. 9 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34577912 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026134253 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714131 $s 1145452
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 57 $c 9 $e 20210919 $i 1648-9144 $m Medicina $n Medicina (Kaunas) $x MED00180386
- GRA __
- $a MZCR - RVO - FNOs/2017 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013