• Something wrong with this record ?

Ultrahypofractionated Proton Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Low and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer-5-Year Outcomes

J. Kubeš, A. Haas, V. Vondráček, M. Andrlík, M. Navrátil, S. Sláviková, P. Vítek, K. Dědečková, J. Prausová, B. Ondrová, Š. Vinakurau, A. Grebenyuk, T. Doležal, B. Velacková, J. Rosina

. 2021 ; 110 (4) : 1090-1097. [pub] 20210212

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

PURPOSE: To analyze the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and late toxicity profile in patients with prostate cancer treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2013 and March 2016, 284 patients with prostate cancer were treated using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), with an ultrahypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE in 5 fractions). Five patients were immediately lost from follow-up and thus were excluded from analysis. Data for 279 patients were prospectively collected and analyzed with a median follow-up time of 56.5 (range, 3.4-87.5) months. The mean age at time of treatment was 64.5 (40.1-85.7) years, and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 6.35 μg/L (0.67-17.3 μg/L). A total of 121 (43.4%) patients had low-risk, 125 patients (44.8%) had favorable, and 33 (11.8%) unfavorable intermediate-risk cancer. In addition, 49 (17.6%) patients underwent neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and no patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. bDFS and late toxicity profiles were evaluated. RESULTS: The median treatment time was 9 days (range, 7-18 days). The 5-year bDFS was 96.9%, 91.7%, and 83.5% for the low-, favorable, and unfavorable intermediate-risk group, respectively. Late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4) was as follows: gastrointestinal: grade 1, 62 patients (22%), grade 2, 20 patients (7.2%), and grade 3, 1 patient (0.36%); genitourinary: grade 1, 80 patients (28.7%), grade 2, 14 patients (5%), and grade 3, 0 patients. PSA relapse was observed in 17 patients (6.1%), and lymph node or bone recurrence was detected in 11 patients. Four (1.4%) local recurrences were detected. Nine patients (3.2%) died of causes unrelated to prostate cancer. No deaths related to prostate cancer were reported. CONCLUSION: Ultrahypofractionated proton beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer is effective with long-term bDFS comparable with other fractionation schedules and with minimal serious long-term GI and GU toxicity.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025349
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240902110206.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.014 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33587990
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kubeš, Jiří $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Ultrahypofractionated Proton Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Low and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer-5-Year Outcomes / $c J. Kubeš, A. Haas, V. Vondráček, M. Andrlík, M. Navrátil, S. Sláviková, P. Vítek, K. Dědečková, J. Prausová, B. Ondrová, Š. Vinakurau, A. Grebenyuk, T. Doležal, B. Velacková, J. Rosina
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To analyze the 5-year biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) and late toxicity profile in patients with prostate cancer treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between January 2013 and March 2016, 284 patients with prostate cancer were treated using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), with an ultrahypofractionated schedule (36.25 GyE in 5 fractions). Five patients were immediately lost from follow-up and thus were excluded from analysis. Data for 279 patients were prospectively collected and analyzed with a median follow-up time of 56.5 (range, 3.4-87.5) months. The mean age at time of treatment was 64.5 (40.1-85.7) years, and the median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 6.35 μg/L (0.67-17.3 μg/L). A total of 121 (43.4%) patients had low-risk, 125 patients (44.8%) had favorable, and 33 (11.8%) unfavorable intermediate-risk cancer. In addition, 49 (17.6%) patients underwent neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and no patients had adjuvant hormonal therapy. bDFS and late toxicity profiles were evaluated. RESULTS: The median treatment time was 9 days (range, 7-18 days). The 5-year bDFS was 96.9%, 91.7%, and 83.5% for the low-, favorable, and unfavorable intermediate-risk group, respectively. Late toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v.4) was as follows: gastrointestinal: grade 1, 62 patients (22%), grade 2, 20 patients (7.2%), and grade 3, 1 patient (0.36%); genitourinary: grade 1, 80 patients (28.7%), grade 2, 14 patients (5%), and grade 3, 0 patients. PSA relapse was observed in 17 patients (6.1%), and lymph node or bone recurrence was detected in 11 patients. Four (1.4%) local recurrences were detected. Nine patients (3.2%) died of causes unrelated to prostate cancer. No deaths related to prostate cancer were reported. CONCLUSION: Ultrahypofractionated proton beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer is effective with long-term bDFS comparable with other fractionation schedules and with minimal serious long-term GI and GU toxicity.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a membránové proteiny $7 D008565
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x radioterapie $7 D011471
650    12
$a protonová terapie $7 D061766
650    12
$a hypofrakcionace při ozařování $7 D000069473
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a nádorové supresorové proteiny $7 D025521
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Haas, Alexandra $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vondráček, Vladimír $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Andrlík, Michal $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: michal.andrlik@ptc.cz $7 xx0322119
700    1_
$a Navrátil, Matěj $u Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sláviková, Silvia $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0280501
700    1_
$a Vítek, Pavel $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dědečková, Kateřina $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prausová, Jana $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ondrová, Barbora $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vinakurau, Štěpán $u Department of Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Proton Therapy Center Czech, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Grebenyuk, Alexander $u Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Department of Health Protection and Disaster Medicine, Saint Petersburg, Russia
700    1_
$a Doležal, Tomáš $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Velacková, Barbora $u Value Outcomes, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rosina, Jozef $u Department of Health Care Disciplines and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic; Department of Medical Biophysics and Informatics, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002371 $t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $x 1879-355X $g Roč. 110, č. 4 (2021), s. 1090-1097
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33587990 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240902110204 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714408 $s 1145856
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 110 $c 4 $d 1090-1097 $e 20210212 $i 1879-355X $m International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $n Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys $x MED00002371
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...