-
Something wrong with this record ?
Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: An acute intrapatient speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic study
A. Bednarek, O. Ionita, P. Moskal, H. Linkova, G. Kiełbasa, R. Prochazkova, J. Vesela, M. Rajzer, K. Curila, M. Jastrzębski
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 1990-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1990-02-01 to 1 year ago
PubMed
33296523
DOI
10.1111/jce.14834
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Echocardiography MeSH
- Ventricular Function, Right MeSH
- Bundle of His * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Cardiac Pacing, Artificial * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Stroke Volume MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the acute differences in left ventricular (LV) function and mechanical synchrony during nonselective His bundle pacing (ns-HBP) versus selective His bundle pacing (s-HBP) using strain echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with permanent His bundle pacing, in whom it was possible to obtain both s-HBP and ns-HBP, were studied in two centers. In each patient, echocardiography was performed sequentially during s-HBP and ns-HBP. Speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters were analyzed: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), the time delay between peak systolic strain in the basal septal and basal lateral segments (BS-BL delay), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and strain delay index. Right ventricle function was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tissue Doppler velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S'). A total of 69 patients (age: 75.6 ± 10.5 years; males: 75%) were enrolled. There were no differences in LV ejection fraction and GLS between s-HBP and ns-HBP modes: 59% versus 60%, and -15.6% versus -15.7%, respectively; as well as no difference in BS-BL delay and strain delay index. The PSD value was higher in the ns-HBP group than in the s-HBP group with the most pronounced difference in the basal LV segments. No differences in right ventricular function parameters (TAPSE and S') were found. CONCLUSION: The ns-HBP and s-HBP modes seem comparable regarding ventricular function. The dyssynchrony parameters were significantly higher during ns-HBP, however, the difference seems modest and clarification of its impact on LV function requires a larger long-term study.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21026266
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133040.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jce.14834 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33296523
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Bednarek, Agnieszka $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 245 10
- $a Nonselective versus selective His bundle pacing: An acute intrapatient speckle-tracking strain echocardiographic study / $c A. Bednarek, O. Ionita, P. Moskal, H. Linkova, G. Kiełbasa, R. Prochazkova, J. Vesela, M. Rajzer, K. Curila, M. Jastrzębski
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: We aimed to compare the acute differences in left ventricular (LV) function and mechanical synchrony during nonselective His bundle pacing (ns-HBP) versus selective His bundle pacing (s-HBP) using strain echocardiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with permanent His bundle pacing, in whom it was possible to obtain both s-HBP and ns-HBP, were studied in two centers. In each patient, echocardiography was performed sequentially during s-HBP and ns-HBP. Speckle-tracking echocardiography parameters were analyzed: Global longitudinal strain (GLS), the time delay between peak systolic strain in the basal septal and basal lateral segments (BS-BL delay), peak strain dispersion (PSD) and strain delay index. Right ventricle function was assessed using tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tissue Doppler velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S'). A total of 69 patients (age: 75.6 ± 10.5 years; males: 75%) were enrolled. There were no differences in LV ejection fraction and GLS between s-HBP and ns-HBP modes: 59% versus 60%, and -15.6% versus -15.7%, respectively; as well as no difference in BS-BL delay and strain delay index. The PSD value was higher in the ns-HBP group than in the s-HBP group with the most pronounced difference in the basal LV segments. No differences in right ventricular function parameters (TAPSE and S') were found. CONCLUSION: The ns-HBP and s-HBP modes seem comparable regarding ventricular function. The dyssynchrony parameters were significantly higher during ns-HBP, however, the difference seems modest and clarification of its impact on LV function requires a larger long-term study.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a Hisův svazek $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D002036
- 650 12
- $a kardiostimulace umělá $7 D002304
- 650 _2
- $a echokardiografie $7 D004452
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a tepový objem $7 D013318
- 650 _2
- $a funkce pravé komory srdeční $7 D016278
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Ionita, Oana $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Medical Faculty of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Moskal, Paweł $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Linkova, Hana $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Medical Faculty of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kiełbasa, Grzegorz $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Prochazkova, Radka $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Medical Faculty of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vesela, Jana $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Medical Faculty of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rajzer, Marek $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Curila, Karol $u Cardiocenter, Department of Cardiology, 3rd Medical Faculty of Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Jastrzębski, Marek $u First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology, and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002569 $t Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $x 1540-8167 $g Roč. 32, č. 1 (2021), s. 117-125
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33296523 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133046 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1715090 $s 1146773
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 32 $c 1 $d 117-125 $e 20201218 $i 1540-8167 $m Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $n J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol $x MED00002569
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013