-
Something wrong with this record ?
What is the future for immersive virtual reality in memory rehabilitation? A systematic review
A. Plechatá, T. Nekovářová, I. Fajnerová
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 1999-08-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1999-02-01 to 1 year ago
PubMed
33780377
DOI
10.3233/nre-201534
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Memory MeSH
- Stroke Rehabilitation methods trends MeSH
- Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy instrumentation methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: A growing interest in non-pharmacological approaches aimed at cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement pointed towards the application of new technologies. The complex virtual reality (VR) presented using immersive devices has been considered a promising approach. OBJECTIVE: The article provides a systematic review of studies aimed at the efficacy of VR-based rehabilitation. First, we shortly summarize literature relevant to the role of immersion in memory assessment and rehabilitation. METHODS: We searched Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed with the search terms "memory rehabilitation", "virtual reality", "memory deficit". Only original studies investigating the efficacy of complex three-dimensional VR in rehabilitation and reporting specific memory output measures were included. RESULTS: We identified 412 citations, of which 21 met our inclusion criteria. We calculated appropriate effect sizes for 10 studies including control groups and providing descriptive data. The effect sizes range from large to small, or no effect of memory rehabilitation was present, depending on the control condition applied. Summarized studies with missing control groups point out to potential positive effects of VR but do not allow any generalization. CONCLUSIONS: Even though there are some theoretical advantages of immersive VE over non-immersive technology, there is not enough evidence yet to draw any conclusions.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21026298
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133021.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3233/NRE-201534 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33780377
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Plechatá, Adéla $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a What is the future for immersive virtual reality in memory rehabilitation? A systematic review / $c A. Plechatá, T. Nekovářová, I. Fajnerová
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: A growing interest in non-pharmacological approaches aimed at cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive enhancement pointed towards the application of new technologies. The complex virtual reality (VR) presented using immersive devices has been considered a promising approach. OBJECTIVE: The article provides a systematic review of studies aimed at the efficacy of VR-based rehabilitation. First, we shortly summarize literature relevant to the role of immersion in memory assessment and rehabilitation. METHODS: We searched Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and PubMed with the search terms "memory rehabilitation", "virtual reality", "memory deficit". Only original studies investigating the efficacy of complex three-dimensional VR in rehabilitation and reporting specific memory output measures were included. RESULTS: We identified 412 citations, of which 21 met our inclusion criteria. We calculated appropriate effect sizes for 10 studies including control groups and providing descriptive data. The effect sizes range from large to small, or no effect of memory rehabilitation was present, depending on the control condition applied. Summarized studies with missing control groups point out to potential positive effects of VR but do not allow any generalization. CONCLUSIONS: Even though there are some theoretical advantages of immersive VE over non-immersive technology, there is not enough evidence yet to draw any conclusions.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a paměť $7 D008568
- 650 _2
- $a rehabilitace po cévní mozkové příhodě $x metody $x trendy $7 D000071939
- 650 _2
- $a terapie pomocí virtuální reality $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D063367
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Nekovářová, Tereza $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Fajnerová, Iveta $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008889 $t NeuroRehabilitation $x 1878-6448 $g Roč. 48, č. 4 (2021), s. 389-412
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33780377 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133028 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1715118 $s 1146805
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 48 $c 4 $d 389-412 $e - $i 1878-6448 $m NeuroRehabilitation $n NeuroRehabilitation $x MED00008889
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013