-
Something wrong with this record ?
Gene fusion characterisation of rare aggressive prostate cancer variants-adenosquamous carcinoma, pleomorphic giant-cell carcinoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma: an analysis of 19 cases
M. Alhamar, I. Tudor Vladislav, SC. Smith, Y. Gao, L. Cheng, LA. Favazza, AM. Alani, MM. Ittmann, ND. Riddle, LJ. Whiteley, NS. Gupta, S. Carskadon, JC. Gomez-Gelvez, DA. Chitale, N. Palanisamy, O. Hes, K. Trpkov, SR. Williamson
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
Henry Ford Health System
PubMed
32639612
DOI
10.1111/his.14205
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Carcinoma, Adenosquamous genetics pathology MeSH
- DNA-Binding Proteins genetics metabolism MeSH
- Gene Fusion * MeSH
- Oncogene Proteins, Fusion genetics MeSH
- Gene Rearrangement MeSH
- In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence MeSH
- Immunohistochemistry MeSH
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell genetics pathology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Metastasis genetics pathology MeSH
- Prostatic Neoplasms genetics pathology MeSH
- Carcinoma, Giant Cell genetics pathology MeSH
- Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf genetics metabolism MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Serine Endopeptidases genetics MeSH
- Transcription Factors genetics metabolism MeSH
- Transcriptional Regulator ERG genetics metabolism MeSH
- High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
AIMS: To evaluate the molecular underpinnings of the rare aggressive prostate cancer variants adenosquamous carcinoma, pleomorphic giant-cell carcinoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrieved 19 tumours with one or more variant(s), and performed ERG immunohistochemistry, a next-generation sequencing assay targeting recurrent gene fusions, and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) for ERG and BRAF. Divergent differentiation included: sarcomatoid carcinoma (n = 10), adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 7), and pleomorphic giant-cell carcinoma (n = 7). Five patients had more than one variant. Four had variants only in metastases. ERG rearrangement was detected in nine (47%, seven via sequencing, showing TMPRSS2-ERG fusions and one GRHL2-ERG fusion, and two via FISH, showing rearrangement via deletion). ERG was immunohistochemically positive in the adenocarcinoma in eight of nine (89%) patients, but was immunohistochemically positive in the variant in only five of nine patients (56%, typically decreased). One patient had a false-positive ERG immunohistochemical result in the sarcomatoid component despite a negative FISH result. Two (11%) harboured BRAF fusions (FAM131A-BRAF and SND1-BRAF). CONCLUSIONS: ERG fusions are present in these rare prostate cancer variants with a frequency close to that in conventional prostate cancer (9/19, 47%). ERG immunohistochemistry usually detects rearrangement in the adenocarcinoma, but is less sensitive for the variant histology, with weak to negative staining. Adenosquamous and sarcomatoid variants can, particularly, occur together. Molecular assessment may be an additional tool in selected cases to confirm the prostatic origin of unusual tumours. The presence of two BRAF rearrangements suggests that this gene fusion may be enriched in this setting, as RAF kinase fusions have been previously reported in 1-2% of prostate cancers.
Department of Pathology and Immunology Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA
Department of Pathology Charles University Faculty of Medicine Plzen Czech Republic
Department of Pathology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis IN USA
Department of Pathology Memorial University St John's Newfoundland Canada
Department of Pathology USF Health Ruffolo Hooper and Associates Tampa FL USA
Department of Pathology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA
Department of Pathology Wayne State University School of Medicine Detroit MI USA
Department of Urology Vattikutti Urology Institute Henry Ford Health System Detroit MI USA
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21026376
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026132941.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/his.14205 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32639612
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Alhamar, Mohamed $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 245 10
- $a Gene fusion characterisation of rare aggressive prostate cancer variants-adenosquamous carcinoma, pleomorphic giant-cell carcinoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma: an analysis of 19 cases / $c M. Alhamar, I. Tudor Vladislav, SC. Smith, Y. Gao, L. Cheng, LA. Favazza, AM. Alani, MM. Ittmann, ND. Riddle, LJ. Whiteley, NS. Gupta, S. Carskadon, JC. Gomez-Gelvez, DA. Chitale, N. Palanisamy, O. Hes, K. Trpkov, SR. Williamson
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: To evaluate the molecular underpinnings of the rare aggressive prostate cancer variants adenosquamous carcinoma, pleomorphic giant-cell carcinoma, and sarcomatoid carcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrieved 19 tumours with one or more variant(s), and performed ERG immunohistochemistry, a next-generation sequencing assay targeting recurrent gene fusions, and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) for ERG and BRAF. Divergent differentiation included: sarcomatoid carcinoma (n = 10), adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 7), and pleomorphic giant-cell carcinoma (n = 7). Five patients had more than one variant. Four had variants only in metastases. ERG rearrangement was detected in nine (47%, seven via sequencing, showing TMPRSS2-ERG fusions and one GRHL2-ERG fusion, and two via FISH, showing rearrangement via deletion). ERG was immunohistochemically positive in the adenocarcinoma in eight of nine (89%) patients, but was immunohistochemically positive in the variant in only five of nine patients (56%, typically decreased). One patient had a false-positive ERG immunohistochemical result in the sarcomatoid component despite a negative FISH result. Two (11%) harboured BRAF fusions (FAM131A-BRAF and SND1-BRAF). CONCLUSIONS: ERG fusions are present in these rare prostate cancer variants with a frequency close to that in conventional prostate cancer (9/19, 47%). ERG immunohistochemistry usually detects rearrangement in the adenocarcinoma, but is less sensitive for the variant histology, with weak to negative staining. Adenosquamous and sarcomatoid variants can, particularly, occur together. Molecular assessment may be an additional tool in selected cases to confirm the prostatic origin of unusual tumours. The presence of two BRAF rearrangements suggests that this gene fusion may be enriched in this setting, as RAF kinase fusions have been previously reported in 1-2% of prostate cancers.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a adenoskvamózní karcinom $x genetika $x patologie $7 D018196
- 650 _2
- $a obrovskobuněčný karcinom $x genetika $x patologie $7 D018286
- 650 _2
- $a karcinom z renálních buněk $x genetika $x patologie $7 D002292
- 650 _2
- $a DNA vazebné proteiny $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D004268
- 650 12
- $a fúze genů $7 D050939
- 650 _2
- $a genová přestavba $7 D015321
- 650 _2
- $a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $7 D059014
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunohistochemie $7 D007150
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace in situ fluorescenční $7 D017404
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a metastázy nádorů $x genetika $x patologie $7 D009362
- 650 _2
- $a fúzní onkogenní proteiny $x genetika $7 D015514
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prostaty $x genetika $x patologie $7 D011471
- 650 _2
- $a protoonkogenní proteiny B-raf $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D048493
- 650 _2
- $a serinové endopeptidasy $x genetika $7 D012697
- 650 _2
- $a transkripční faktory $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D014157
- 650 _2
- $a transkripční regulátor ERG $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D000071230
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Tudor Vladislav, I $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Smith, Steven C $u Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Gao, Yuan $u Department of Pathology, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Cheng, Liang $u Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Favazza, Laura A $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Alani, Ali M $u Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Ittmann, Michael M $u Department of Pathology & Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Riddle, Nicole D $u Department of Pathology, USF Health, Ruffolo, Hooper, and Associates, Tampa, FL, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Whiteley, Lisa J $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Gupta, Nilesh S $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Carskadon, Shannon $u Department of Urology, Vattikutti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Gomez-Gelvez, Juan C $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Chitale, Dhananjay A $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA $u Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Palanisamy, Nallasivam $u Department of Urology, Vattikutti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Hes, Ondrej $u Department of Pathology, Charles University Faculty of Medicine, Plzen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Trpkov, Kiril $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- 700 1_
- $a Williamson, Sean R $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA $u Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002043 $t Histopathology $x 1365-2559 $g Roč. 77, č. 6 (2020), s. 890-899
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32639612 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026132947 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1715176 $s 1146883
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 77 $c 6 $d 890-899 $e 20200913 $i 1365-2559 $m Histopathology $n Histopathology $x MED00002043
- GRA __
- $p Henry Ford Health System
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013