• Something wrong with this record ?

Audiovisual Consults by Paramedics to Reduce Hospital Transport After Low-Urgency Calls: Randomized Controlled Trial

R. Sykora, M. Renza, J. Ruzicka, P. Bakurova, M. Kukacka, J. Smetana, F. Duska

. 2020 ; 35 (6) : 656-662. [pub] 20200928

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health Management Database (ProQuest) from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago

INTRODUCTION: The effect and subjective perception of audiovisual consults (AVCs) by paramedics with a distant physician in prehospital emergency care (PHEC) remain unexplained, especially in low-urgency calls. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of AVCs by paramedics with a base physician on the rate of patients treated on site without the need of hospital transfer. The co-primary safety outcome was the frequency of repeated ambulance trips within 48 hours to the same patient. Secondary objective was the qualitative analysis of perception of the AVCs. METHODS: During a six-week period, the dispatching center of Karlovy Vary Emergency Medical Service (EMS) randomized low-urgency events from a rural area (n = 791) to receive either a mandatory phone-call consult (PHONE), AVC (VIDEO), or performed by the paramedic crew in a routine manner, when phone-call consultation is for paramedic crew optional (CONTROL). Secondarily, the qualitative analysis of subjective perception of AVCs compared to consultation over the phone by the paramedic and consulting physician was performed. RESULTS: Per-protocol analysis (PPA) was performed (CONTROL, n = 258; PHONE, n = 193; and VIDEO, n = 192) in addition to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Patients (PPA) in both mandatory consulted groups were twice as likely to be treated and left on site compared to the CONTROL (PHONE: OR = 2.07; 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.58; P = 0.01 or VIDEO: OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.49; P = .01). Repeated trips to patients treated and left on site in 48 hours occurred in three (8.6%) of 35 cases in the PHONE group and in eight (23.5%) of 34 cases in the VIDEO group. CONCLUSIONS: The AVCs of the emergency physician by paramedics was not superior to the mandatory conventional phone call in increasing the proportion of patients treated and left at home after a low-urgency call. The AVC improved the subjective feelings of safety by physicians, but not the satisfaction of patients or paramedics, and may lead to an increased need of repeated trips.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026399
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20231012092618.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2020 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1017/S1049023X2000117X $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32985403
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Sykora, Roman $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $u Emergency Medical Service of Karlovy Vary Region, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Audiovisual Consults by Paramedics to Reduce Hospital Transport After Low-Urgency Calls: Randomized Controlled Trial / $c R. Sykora, M. Renza, J. Ruzicka, P. Bakurova, M. Kukacka, J. Smetana, F. Duska
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: The effect and subjective perception of audiovisual consults (AVCs) by paramedics with a distant physician in prehospital emergency care (PHEC) remain unexplained, especially in low-urgency calls. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of AVCs by paramedics with a base physician on the rate of patients treated on site without the need of hospital transfer. The co-primary safety outcome was the frequency of repeated ambulance trips within 48 hours to the same patient. Secondary objective was the qualitative analysis of perception of the AVCs. METHODS: During a six-week period, the dispatching center of Karlovy Vary Emergency Medical Service (EMS) randomized low-urgency events from a rural area (n = 791) to receive either a mandatory phone-call consult (PHONE), AVC (VIDEO), or performed by the paramedic crew in a routine manner, when phone-call consultation is for paramedic crew optional (CONTROL). Secondarily, the qualitative analysis of subjective perception of AVCs compared to consultation over the phone by the paramedic and consulting physician was performed. RESULTS: Per-protocol analysis (PPA) was performed (CONTROL, n = 258; PHONE, n = 193; and VIDEO, n = 192) in addition to the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Patients (PPA) in both mandatory consulted groups were twice as likely to be treated and left on site compared to the CONTROL (PHONE: OR = 2.07; 95% CI, 1.19 to 3.58; P = 0.01 or VIDEO: OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.15 to 3.49; P = .01). Repeated trips to patients treated and left on site in 48 hours occurred in three (8.6%) of 35 cases in the PHONE group and in eight (23.5%) of 34 cases in the VIDEO group. CONCLUSIONS: The AVCs of the emergency physician by paramedics was not superior to the mandatory conventional phone call in increasing the proportion of patients treated and left at home after a low-urgency call. The AVC improved the subjective feelings of safety by physicians, but not the satisfaction of patients or paramedics, and may lead to an increased need of repeated trips.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a pomocný zdravotnický personál $7 D000488
650    12
$a sanitky $7 D000552
650    12
$a audiovizuální pomůcky $7 D001296
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    12
$a urgentní zdravotnické služby $7 D004632
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a lékaři $7 D010820
650    12
$a konziliární vyšetření a konzultace $7 D012017
650    12
$a telemedicína $7 D017216
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Renza, Metodej $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ruzicka, Jiri $u Emergency Medical Service of Karlovy Vary Region, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic $u Emergency Medical Service of Pilsen Region, Pilsen, Czech Republic $u Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bakurova, Petra $u Emergency Medical Service of Karlovy Vary Region, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kukacka, Milos $u Emergency Medical Service of Karlovy Vary Region, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Smetana, Jiří $u Emergency Medical Service of Karlovy Vary Region, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic $7 xx0308189
700    1_
$a Duska, Frantisek $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and FNKV University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00005731 $t Prehospital and disaster medicine $x 1945-1938 $g Roč. 35, č. 6 (2020), s. 656-662
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32985403 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20231012092612 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715191 $s 1146906
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 35 $c 6 $d 656-662 $e 20200928 $i 1945-1938 $m Prehospital and disaster medicine $n Prehosp Disaster Med $x MED00005731
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...