• Something wrong with this record ?

Beck depression inventory, second edition, Czech version: demographic correlates, factor structure and comparison with foreign data

M. Ciharova, H. Cígler, V. Dostálová, G. Šivicová, O. Bezdicek

. 2020 ; 24 (4) : 371-379. [pub] 20200618

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21026450

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine whether demographic characteristics (i.e., sex, age and education) correlate with total scores of the Czech version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), understand the factorial structure of this scale, compare our results with findings of studies conducted in other countries and provide preliminary normative data for use in clinical practice. METHODS: Data of 450 participants were analysed using correlation analysis, non-parametric tests and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Women, and participants with lower education, tended to score higher than men, and participants with higher education. There was no significant relationship between age and total scores. CFA confirmed two factors: cognitive-affective and somatic. Czech participants scored lower than participants in other studies. Preliminary normative data are presented in the form of percentile values for the whole sample and stratified according to gender and education level. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the usage of the BDI-II total score while taking into account also the cognitive-affective and somatic factor subscores. The comparison of our results with other foreign findings shows the need for the development of locally specific normative values for self-reported depression scales. KEY POINTS Women scored higher in the BDI-II than men. Participants with lower education scored higher in the BDI-II than participants with higher education. CFA confirmed two factors: cognitive-affective and somatic. Preliminary normative data for the Czech version of the BDI-II are stratified according to gender and education.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026450
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240723092154.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/13651501.2020.1775854 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32552177
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Ciharova, Marketa $u Diamant Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Section Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
245    10
$a Beck depression inventory, second edition, Czech version: demographic correlates, factor structure and comparison with foreign data / $c M. Ciharova, H. Cígler, V. Dostálová, G. Šivicová, O. Bezdicek
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine whether demographic characteristics (i.e., sex, age and education) correlate with total scores of the Czech version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), understand the factorial structure of this scale, compare our results with findings of studies conducted in other countries and provide preliminary normative data for use in clinical practice. METHODS: Data of 450 participants were analysed using correlation analysis, non-parametric tests and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). RESULTS: Women, and participants with lower education, tended to score higher than men, and participants with higher education. There was no significant relationship between age and total scores. CFA confirmed two factors: cognitive-affective and somatic. Czech participants scored lower than participants in other studies. Preliminary normative data are presented in the form of percentile values for the whole sample and stratified according to gender and education level. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the usage of the BDI-II total score while taking into account also the cognitive-affective and somatic factor subscores. The comparison of our results with other foreign findings shows the need for the development of locally specific normative values for self-reported depression scales. KEY POINTS Women scored higher in the BDI-II than men. Participants with lower education scored higher in the BDI-II than participants with higher education. CFA confirmed two factors: cognitive-affective and somatic. Preliminary normative data for the Czech version of the BDI-II are stratified according to gender and education.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a deprese $x diagnóza $7 D003863
650    _2
$a depresivní poruchy $x diagnóza $7 D003866
650    _2
$a stupeň vzdělání $7 D004522
650    _2
$a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011569
650    _2
$a psychometrie $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011594
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cígler, Hynek $u Department of Psychology & Institute for Research on Children, Youth, and Family, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Dostálová, Veronika $u Diamant Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0320210
700    1_
$a Šivicová, Gabriela $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bezdicek, Ondrej $u Diamant Neuropsychology Laboratory, Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, 1st Faculty of Medicine, General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Prague College of Psychosocial Studies, Prague, Czech Republic $u National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00006348 $t International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice $x 1471-1788 $g Roč. 24, č. 4 (2020), s. 371-379
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32552177 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240723092151 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715233 $s 1146957
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 24 $c 4 $d 371-379 $e 20200618 $i 1471-1788 $m International journal of psychiatry in clinical practice $n Int. j. psychiatry clin. pract.(Print) $x MED00006348
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options