Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Accessory bones of the elbow: Prevalence, localization and modified classification

V. Kunc, V. Kunc, V. Černý, M. Polovinčák, D. Kachlík

. 2020 ; 237 (4) : 618-622. [pub] 20200824

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21026522
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 1916 do Před 2 roky
PubMed Central od 1916 do Před 2 roky
Europe PubMed Central od 1916 do Před 2 roky
Wiley Free Content od 1997 do Před 2 roky

Accessory bones in the region of the elbow are rare variants with high clinical significance as they may be confused with avulsion fractures. We investigated their prevalence and performed a statistical analysis to support their congenital origin. Their localization was mapped to show their exact site of occurrence. We evaluated anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of 2413 elbows in a Central European population from which a group of accessory bony structures was selected. Their character was evaluated, and accessory bones were identified. We used logistic regression to evaluate the potential relationship between the occurrence of accessory bones, the age of patients, and the occurrence of calcar olecrani. The prevalence of accessory bones of the elbow in the sample was 0.77%. Our results did not show a statistically significant relationship with the occurrence of calcar olecrani or with the age of patients. The most common type was os subepicondylare mediale (type V) in 0.46%, which was located distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus, followed by os subepicondylare laterale (type III; 0.21%), situated laterally to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. In comparison with previous reports, os sesamoideum mediale (type IV) was located more distally. Our data suggest that congenital accessory bones are a rare entity. Knowledge of their exact localization should be considered during diagnosis of avulsion fractures and other unclear diagnoses including accessory bony structures in the elbow region.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026522
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240814110706.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/joa.13233 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32839981
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kunc, Vojtěch $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0320755
245    10
$a Accessory bones of the elbow: Prevalence, localization and modified classification / $c V. Kunc, V. Kunc, V. Černý, M. Polovinčák, D. Kachlík
520    9_
$a Accessory bones in the region of the elbow are rare variants with high clinical significance as they may be confused with avulsion fractures. We investigated their prevalence and performed a statistical analysis to support their congenital origin. Their localization was mapped to show their exact site of occurrence. We evaluated anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of 2413 elbows in a Central European population from which a group of accessory bony structures was selected. Their character was evaluated, and accessory bones were identified. We used logistic regression to evaluate the potential relationship between the occurrence of accessory bones, the age of patients, and the occurrence of calcar olecrani. The prevalence of accessory bones of the elbow in the sample was 0.77%. Our results did not show a statistically significant relationship with the occurrence of calcar olecrani or with the age of patients. The most common type was os subepicondylare mediale (type V) in 0.46%, which was located distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus, followed by os subepicondylare laterale (type III; 0.21%), situated laterally to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. In comparison with previous reports, os sesamoideum mediale (type IV) was located more distally. Our data suggest that congenital accessory bones are a rare entity. Knowledge of their exact localization should be considered during diagnosis of avulsion fractures and other unclear diagnoses including accessory bony structures in the elbow region.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a loket $x abnormality $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D004550
650    _2
$a loketní kloub $x abnormality $x krevní zásobení $7 D004551
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a radiografie $7 D011859
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kunc, Vladimír, $u Department of Computer Science, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1992- $7 xx0321042
700    1_
$a Černý, Vojtěch $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0319605
700    1_
$a Polovinčák, Michal $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kachlík, David $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Health Care Studies, College of Polytechnics, Jihlava, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002511 $t Journal of anatomy $x 1469-7580 $g Roč. 237, č. 4 (2020), s. 618-622
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32839981 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240814110702 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715290 $s 1147029
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 237 $c 4 $d 618-622 $e 20200824 $i 1469-7580 $m Journal of anatomy $n J Anat $x MED00002511
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...