-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Accessory bones of the elbow: Prevalence, localization and modified classification
V. Kunc, V. Kunc, V. Černý, M. Polovinčák, D. Kachlík
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1916 do Před 2 roky
PubMed Central
od 1916 do Před 2 roky
Europe PubMed Central
od 1916 do Před 2 roky
Wiley Free Content
od 1997 do Před 2 roky
PubMed
32839981
DOI
10.1111/joa.13233
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- loket abnormality diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- loketní kloub abnormality krevní zásobení MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- radiografie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Accessory bones in the region of the elbow are rare variants with high clinical significance as they may be confused with avulsion fractures. We investigated their prevalence and performed a statistical analysis to support their congenital origin. Their localization was mapped to show their exact site of occurrence. We evaluated anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of 2413 elbows in a Central European population from which a group of accessory bony structures was selected. Their character was evaluated, and accessory bones were identified. We used logistic regression to evaluate the potential relationship between the occurrence of accessory bones, the age of patients, and the occurrence of calcar olecrani. The prevalence of accessory bones of the elbow in the sample was 0.77%. Our results did not show a statistically significant relationship with the occurrence of calcar olecrani or with the age of patients. The most common type was os subepicondylare mediale (type V) in 0.46%, which was located distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus, followed by os subepicondylare laterale (type III; 0.21%), situated laterally to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. In comparison with previous reports, os sesamoideum mediale (type IV) was located more distally. Our data suggest that congenital accessory bones are a rare entity. Knowledge of their exact localization should be considered during diagnosis of avulsion fractures and other unclear diagnoses including accessory bony structures in the elbow region.
Department of Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Computer Science Czech Technical University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Health Care Studies College of Polytechnics Jihlava Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21026522
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240814110706.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/joa.13233 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32839981
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kunc, Vojtěch $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0320755
- 245 10
- $a Accessory bones of the elbow: Prevalence, localization and modified classification / $c V. Kunc, V. Kunc, V. Černý, M. Polovinčák, D. Kachlík
- 520 9_
- $a Accessory bones in the region of the elbow are rare variants with high clinical significance as they may be confused with avulsion fractures. We investigated their prevalence and performed a statistical analysis to support their congenital origin. Their localization was mapped to show their exact site of occurrence. We evaluated anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of 2413 elbows in a Central European population from which a group of accessory bony structures was selected. Their character was evaluated, and accessory bones were identified. We used logistic regression to evaluate the potential relationship between the occurrence of accessory bones, the age of patients, and the occurrence of calcar olecrani. The prevalence of accessory bones of the elbow in the sample was 0.77%. Our results did not show a statistically significant relationship with the occurrence of calcar olecrani or with the age of patients. The most common type was os subepicondylare mediale (type V) in 0.46%, which was located distal to the medial epicondyle of the humerus, followed by os subepicondylare laterale (type III; 0.21%), situated laterally to the lateral epicondyle of the humerus. In comparison with previous reports, os sesamoideum mediale (type IV) was located more distally. Our data suggest that congenital accessory bones are a rare entity. Knowledge of their exact localization should be considered during diagnosis of avulsion fractures and other unclear diagnoses including accessory bony structures in the elbow region.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a loket $x abnormality $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D004550
- 650 _2
- $a loketní kloub $x abnormality $x krevní zásobení $7 D004551
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a radiografie $7 D011859
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kunc, Vladimír, $u Department of Computer Science, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1992- $7 xx0321042
- 700 1_
- $a Černý, Vojtěch $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0319605
- 700 1_
- $a Polovinčák, Michal $u Department of Radiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kachlík, David $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Health Care Studies, College of Polytechnics, Jihlava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002511 $t Journal of anatomy $x 1469-7580 $g Roč. 237, č. 4 (2020), s. 618-622
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32839981 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240814110702 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1715290 $s 1147029
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 237 $c 4 $d 618-622 $e 20200824 $i 1469-7580 $m Journal of anatomy $n J Anat $x MED00002511
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013